It has all the ingredients of a chilling mystery: the skeleton of an unknown man discovered within a Roman sarcophagus unearthed in the grounds of Westminster Abbey.
asserted
It → have → Abbey
Now an expert has said he has solved the longstanding “who-is-it”, suggesting the remains belonged to a medieval abbot.
asserted
remains → say → abbot
First discovered in 1820, the limestone sarcophagus was officially excavated in 1869 from what is now an area of grass along the north side of the nave, but was once the yard of a sacristy built by Henry III.
asserted
what → discover → III
But the discovery spawned a mystery: whose remains were inside?
asserted
remains → spawn → mystery
While the sarcophagus itself was from the late Roman period, with a Latin inscription to one Valerius Amandinus and Roman decoration on one side, no Roman artefacts were found in subsequent excavations of the area.
“That was not its original place of burial,” said Prof Warwick Rodwell, a consultant archaeologist at Westminster Abbey, noting it was likely the sarcophagus was originally housed in the wall recess of a mausoleum, and that Valerius Amandinus was a wealthy individual.
What’s more, the lid of the fourth-century sarcophagus was decorated with a large, carved cross that was later shown to be a modification of the original lid.
asserted
that → find → lid
It runs the full length and the width of the lid, and it’s a very specific late Anglo-Saxon cross type,” Rodwell said.
asserted
Rodwell → run → lid
Writing in the Journal of the British Archaeological Association, Rodwell not only describes what was previously known about the sarcophagus but sets out the findings of a more recent investigation in 2018 as part of plans to display the sarcophagus in the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Galleries.
asserted
what → write → Galleries
As part of that work the sarcophagus was taken to a laboratory and its lid removed.
asserted
lid → take → laboratory
“And there, inside it, was the skeleton,” Rodwell said.
asserted
Rodwell → say → it
The discovery was something of a surprise given written records had suggested the skeleton had been lost.
uncertain
skeleton → give → surprise
However, Rodwell said the bones tallied with those depicted in 19th-century drawings.
asserted
bones → say → drawings
A subsequent analysis suggested the remains belonged to a man who was 5ft 9in tall and aged between 35 and 49.
uncertain
who → suggest → 35
In another twist, when the inside of the sarcophagus was cleaned, experts found a rectangular outline in a white substance in the bottom of the sarcophagus.
asserted
experts → clean → sarcophagus
Rodwell said this suggests the body had been covered in powdered lime before being placed into a wooden coffin that sat inside the sarcophagus.
uncertain
that → say → sarcophagus
Crucially, radiocarbon dating of the bones suggested they were from the late 10th or early 11th century.
uncertain
they → suggest → century
Now Rodwell said he had the answer to the identity of the dead man, suggesting it was most likely a medieval abbott.
asserted
it → say → man
“Nobody of lower rank would have been buried in anything like that,” he said, adding that the lid was another clue.
asserted
lid → bury → that
“The Latin cross again points to a major ecclesiastic.”
asserted
cross → point → ecclesiastic
According to Rodwell, there are two possible abbots who fit the bill: Ælfwig, who died in about 1020, and Wulfnoth who died in about 1049.
uncertain
who → accord → 1049
Rodwell believes Ælfwig is the most likely candidate, noting he was already a monk at Westminster when the previous abbot died, and spent about 27 years in the role.
asserted
abbot → believe → role
Rodwell suggested the re-used sarcophagus was most likely interred in the eastern arm of the abbey church, with the lid as a floor slab, before being dug up and reburied during the construction work of Henry III.
uncertain
sarcophagus → suggest → III
“It’s like so much in archaeology,” said Rodwell.
asserted
Rodwell → ’ → archaeology
“There’s a lot more complication than one initially sees.”
asserted
one → ’ → ?