Welcome back to How We Win, a Guardian opinion series with leading thinkers, offering bold ideas for America’s political future.
asserted
We → welcome → future
Last week, Robert Reich highlighted the link between corruption and affordability.
asserted
Reich → highlight → corruption
Today’s edition was written by Guardian US columnist Rebecca Solnit.
asserted
edition → write → Solnit
“The world should accept some bad things happening,” Sam Altman, the head of OpenAI, said recently, “for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency.”
asserted
Altman → accept → agency
Like so many things tech oligarchs say, it’s incoherent, since Altman would like to deny the world and the people in it the agency to decide whether or not we should accept his bad things.
asserted
we → say → things
Surveys show that most Americans would like to pause AI; opposition to AI datacenters is a factor in many races in the midterm elections.
asserted
opposition → show → elections
People are outraged and anxious about what tech hath wrought, mad enough to fight back in what is coming to seem like a human v machine battle.
asserted
what → work → battle
I’ve been a fan of the film Terminator 2 forever, the one where a badass female protagonist leads the action-movie-style spectacular destruction of Skynet, the massive computer system that will otherwise go rogue and pit itself and a plethora of advanced weapons against the human race.
asserted
that → lead → race
We’re not in a film and we’re probably not going to solve the problems big tech creates through spectacular violence, although the guerrilla campaigns to take down, disable or destroy Flock cameras have some action-movie charms (wading through the bureaucratic process of getting cities to reject or take down the surveillance technology is probably more effective.
asserted
cities → ’re → technology
A few months ago, I was surprised to find myself using the term “beautiful hatred” to describe the nationwide revolt against datacenters, Flock cameras, AI, and tech corporations and the oligarchs (or broligarchs) they’ve spawned.
asserted
they → find → datacenters
It is beautiful because behind fierce opposition to a destructive force is something you’re trying to protect from destruction, something you care about, even love.
asserted
you → try → destruction
Like the Trump administration, the tech overlords have proceeded on the assumption they can ignore or override the will of the people.
asserted
they → proceed → people
The will of the people is in the process of proving them wrong, at least to some extent, and the midterms will be, among other things, a referendum on the GOP’s alignment with predatory tech giants over the public they’re supposed to serve and, arguably, humanity itself.
asserted
they → prove → public
It’s sometimes said only a common enemy can unite a country, and in that sense Silicon Valley has provided something useful at last, because across the political spectrum people hate datacenters and are working to stop them.
asserted
people → say → them
Datacenterwatch.org reports that at least 142 activist groups across 24 states have organized to block datacenter construction and expansion.
asserted
groups → report → construction
Often the foregrounded concerns are about local issues – effects on land, water, electricity prices, noise – since datacenters offer a lot of negatives and, arguably, no real positives, not even more than a handful of local jobs.
asserted
datacenters → foreground → jobs
But behind that is beautiful hatred of the high-handed efforts to bludgeon communities into accepting something for which they’ll get little in return but trouble – and of AI itself.
asserted
they → bludgeon → AI
A nine-year-old I spend time with recently remarked: “I don’t trust AI,” more or less out of the blue, and I think she speaks for a lot of us.
asserted
she → spend → us
Never mind my nine-year-old; the pope is speaking up against it, too, saying in a recent social media post: “Algorithms lack the spark of humanity” and calling on us to “safeguard our humanity” against tech’s incursions.
asserted
Algorithms → mind → incursions
The tech leaders onstage with Trump at his second inauguration thought they’d turn him into their golden escalator up; the current revolt suggests they could follow him on the golden escalator down.
uncertain
they → think → escalator
In San Francisco, more than 1,000 nurses and community members came out in a march in September to demand that hospitals cut ties with Palantir, Peter Thiel’s sinister surveillance corporation that also aids Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
asserted
that → come → Immigration
Nurses in the march noted that the software makes significant errors, violates patient confidentiality and the president of the California Nurses Association and National Nurses Organizing Committee said: “The violence and destruction unleashed by immigration agents and enabled by Palantir is a total violation of nursing values of care and compassion.”
asserted
violence → note → care
Recent news stories, following former Anthropic safety employee Jacob Coxon’s statements about AI’s near-term apocalyptic risks, were further reminders of the absolute amorality of Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei.
asserted
stories → follow → Altman
The documents for Anthropic’s IPO acknowledged AI models could pose “catastrophic or existential risks to humanity”, and the sheer arrogance of choosing to make profit-driven private decisions about the collective future is another reason to loathe and oppose them.
uncertain
arrogance → acknowledge → them
Although there are useful and legitimate applications of this technology, the people pushing it on us are pursuing its more dangerous and corrosive uses, even as their products again and again prove harmful and unreliable.
asserted
products → be → uses
In recent weeks another AI safety employee quit, OpenAI’s David Robinson, with a statement noting: “The future depends on wisdom that Silicon Valley lacks.”
asserted
Valley → quit → that
We will not see anything as dramatic and decisive as the explosion of Skynet, but we are seeing enough of a grassroots opposition going after so many aspects of tech, that maybe history will remember it as the beginning of our war against the machines.
asserted
history → see → machines
A new organization called Mothers Against Media Addiction (Mama) is going after the effects of the internet and smartphones on children.
asserted
organization → call → children
Other encouraging developments include New York City’s decision to ban AI for students through eighth grade, and the most recent round of lawsuits against Meta for what Instagram and Facebook do to children.
asserted
Instagram → include → children
Meanwhile congressional Democrats, spurred on by their constituents, are stumbling toward regulation of the tech industry that protects human beings against machines and the owners of those machines.
asserted
that → spur → machines
Another new organization, called the Association for Human Mathematics (AHM), founded in September, declares that it “protects mathematics as a human endeavor against the threat of artificial intelligence”.
asserted
it → call → intelligence
AHM seems to have been founded in response to OpenAI claiming it solved one of the longstanding problems in mathematics.
asserted
it → seem → mathematics
Since then it has gone after many more, much to the dismay of mathematicians.
asserted
it → go → mathematicians
The mission statement recognizes, as many creative workers do, that the process of thinking, struggling, creating, learning, writing is at least as important as the product, that in doing the work we form ourselves as well as arrive as results.
asserted
we → recognize → results
“Why surrender our agency (that amazing ability we have to reach across time and space, with our strange, idiosyncratic phenomenon, and land within the sensibility of another human being) to something that, by its very design, pushes the individual sensibility aside?” said novelist George Saunders of AI.
asserted
Saunders → surrender → AI
The spiritually bereft rhetoric of AI, like so much tech rhetoric, insists that doing things is hard and we don’t want to do hard things.
asserted
we → insist → things
As the brilliant tech critic Sherry Turkle points out, AI as currently promoted and used threatens to “deskill” us both intellectually and emotionally, if we depend on it for a sycophantic pandering to our egos in place of the challenge of human relationships, if we make it do our mental labor for us.
asserted
it → point → us
Like physical strength, emotional and intellectual strength are achieved through efforts tech would like us to abandon in favor of outsourcing the work to their products.
asserted
us → achieve → products
A third new anti-AI organization, launched by longtime climate activist Phil Aroneanu, is called Irreplaceable.org, and while its main goal is to regulate AI, its premise is that we need to protect our incomes, our rights, our freedom, but also our humanity against the tech corporations pushing AI.
asserted
we → launch → AI
These new developments point to something that’s going to be important in the resistance to big tech: as it seeks to literally dehumanize us and argues for replacing human beings (and at its most extreme, humanity itself), we must define and cherish and defend what does make us human and what makes being human joyful, meaningful, dignified and honorable.
asserted
being → point → extreme
…and 6 more, not listed.
The Aporia
