Trump’s botched execution on Katie Zacharia speaks volumes about Susie Wiles’ future

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Feinberg, A. (2026, October 20). Trump’s botched execution on Katie Zacharia speaks volumes about Susie Wiles’ future. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/katie-zacharia-trump-wiles-analysis-b3069514.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-20 · by Andrew Feinberg

Quick Summary

Susie Wiles, President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, quickly quashed rumors of her impending dismissal following the botched tenure of Katie Zacharia as press secretary. Zacharia, hired without Wiles’ knowledge, lasted only five days, during which she made several gaffes including referring to herself incorrectly as a lawyer and failing to answer questions smoothly. Trump fired Zacharia after she appeared on Fox News for an interview widely criticized as ineffective. This series of events highlights the delicate balance Wiles must maintain in her role to protect her position from further threats.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Donald Trump nearly replaced Susie Wiles, his longest-serving chief of staff, after a week of internal White House discussions about potential successors. The initial buzz started when Politico reported that Trump was considering several names, including informal advice from friends. However, the situation shifted dramatically when Trump hired an unqualified TV personality as top spokesperson over Wiles' objections. This decision backfired within 72 hours when the hire was heavily criticized on Trump’s favorite TV channel. Consequently, Trump essentially fired the new hire himself in a public spectacle on the South Lawn while Marine One idled behind him. The episode served as a stark warning to those contemplating Wiles' departure and reinforced her position despite earlier rumors.

Written for “Trump's Attack On Journalistkaza Zacharia” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 2 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 93201 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-20

Story

📰 Trump's Attack On Journalistkaza Zacharia
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 7 of 72 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Susie Wiles' position but describe distinct events and timelines.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 48 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different stages and aspects of Katie Zacharia's brief tenure as White House press secretary, rather than a single specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 13% hedged 4 of 31 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles discuss different time periods and foci within Katie Zacharia's short tenure as press secretary.”
October 16, 2026 different event · 90%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 13% hedged 7 of 52
“Article A discusses Katie Zacharia's resignation as White House press secretary, while Article B mentions Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff and potential replacement rumors.”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 34 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Susie Wiles and Katie Zacharia but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 25 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A discusses Katie Zacharia's dismissal as White House press secretary and subsequent social media issues, while Article B focuses on Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff and rumors about her potential replacement.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 23% hedged 7 of 31 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of internal issues within Trump's administration, with Article A focusing on Katie Zacharia's resignation and Article B speculating about Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 30% hedged 8 of 27 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different stages of speculation and confirmation regarding Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff, rather than a single specific incident.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 4 of 45 📰 publisher trust 60
“While both articles discuss internal White House turmoil involving Katie Zacharia and Susie Wiles, they describe different phases or aspects of the situation rather than a single specific incident.”
No ‘turmoil’ at the White House different event · 85%
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 34 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses President Trump firing Katie Zacharia, while Article B mentions rumors about Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff and potential replacements. The articles describe different aspects of White House personnel changes.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
2 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 2660 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Andrew Feinberg
21 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It didn’t take Susie Wiles more than a few day to put a stop to the buzz in Washington that predicted her time as chief of staff was up.
🔮 President Donald Trump said on Monday that the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is “70% filled with water and looking good” and warned that anyone who damages it again “will GO TO JAIL,” even though federal prosecutors appointed by Trump himself have told a court the pool’s lining was ruined by a botched installation and not by vandals.
🔮 You think about it, but I wouldn’t reconsider.
🔮 He reportedly has found no shortage of people willing to encourage him to dump his loyal aide overboard, with one GOP operative noting that Wiles has “burned a lot of people” in her time leading Trump’s administration.
🔮 She was asked about how she will handle the notoriously tough press secretary role while juggling being a mother to four children given how her predecessor chose to resign over the burdens of balancing the job with caring for just two children.
🔮 House Speaker Mike Johnson has told the Trump administration he has doubts about its plan to broadcast the firing squad execution of Fort Hood gunman Nidal Hasan, warning that video of the killing could end up as “a recruiting tool for future terrorists.”
🔮 Zacharia will fill a role that has been vacant since August, when former press secretary Karoline Leavitt resigned to spend more time with her two young children shortly after giving birth to her infant daughter.
🔮 "The Fake and Artificial News is out there trying to say that I'm inviting the enemy to bomb San Diego and Los Angeles when, in actuality, what I was talking about was that a temporary increase in the price of Gasoline is a small price to pay for Iran not having a Nuclear Weapon and, if you want to see a big price, can you imagine what it would be like if they bombed San Diego and/or Los Angeles?"
🔮 President Donald Trump on Thursday opened up a new front in his ongoing war against commonly-used terms and geographic place names by warning that anyone referring to Large Language Models such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Anthropic’s Claude as “Artificial Intelligence” would earn themselves a place on his enemies list. Writing on Truth Social, he declared that the White House “considers anyone that uses the term, ‘Artificial Intelligence,’ as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, ‘Super Intelligence,’ THE ENEMY!”
🔮 Talarico, the 37-year-old seminarian who is currently leading Paxton in most recent polls of the Texas Senate race, has repeatedly denied subscribing to a vegan or vegetarian diet — a lifestyle choice that would be politically perilous in a cattle-raising state such as Texas.
Also by Andrew Feinberg
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 21 articles by Andrew Feinberg →

Topics

Florida Independent Politico Washington White House

Subjects

Wiles PERSON · 7× Zacharia PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 5× Hannity PERSON · 3× White House ORG · 3× Fox News ORG · 2× Politico ORG · 2× Susie Wiles PERSON · 2× Independent NORP · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

After the president went around his chief of staff to hire an unqualified TV personality as his top spokesperson, his choice was disassembled on his favorite TV channel within 72 hours, leading him to all but fire her himself on the South Lawn while Marine One idled behind him. If anyone spent last week measuring the drapes in the chief of staff’s office, seeing Zacharia’s hide nailed to Wiles’ wall was a useful warning.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20
🔮 It didn’t take Susie Wiles more than a few day to put a stop to the buzz in Washington that predicted her time as chief of staff was up.

Claims (28 extracted, 2 hedged)

It didn’t take Susie Wiles more than a few day to put a stop to the buzz in Washington that predicted her time as chief of staff was up. asserted
time → take → staff
The rumors started swirling on Thursday when Politico reported President Donald Trump had been on the phone with his friends and informal advisors asking if they thought he should replace Wiles, his longest-serving chief of staff. asserted
he → swirl → staff
Citing four sources with direct knowledge of the president’s conversations, the outlet reported that Trump had been floating several names for a successor to the veteran Florida political operative, who is the first woman to serve as White House chief of staff. asserted
who → cite → staff
A day later, more reports indicated that Trump’s close aide Natalie Harp had been bringing him articles about the possibility of replacing Wiles, which caused him to fly off the handle and make even more calls to more allies, with another source claiming that Wiles and her team were frantically calling people all over town to get them to vouch for her in turn. asserted
them → indicate → turn
The evidence for Wiles’ tentative grip on her post had shown up at the White House days earlier in the form of Katie Zacharia, who Trump hired as his press secretary the previous Friday without informing Wiles, who had been working for weeks to secure CNN’s resident MAGA voice Scott Jennings as Karoline Leavitt's replacement. asserted
who → show → replacement
She lasted from Monday to Friday. asserted
She → last → Friday
During her 14 minutes at the podium on Tuesday, Zacharia read haltingly off a script for eight of those minutes, answered three questions from friendly media outlets, referred to her husband as "my president," and announced the firing of the ambassador to Greece as she walked out the door. asserted
she → read → door
The same day, she was pressed on reports that she’d never passed any state bar despite holding herself out as a “lawyer” in multiple television appearances over the last year. asserted
she → press → year
The story festered on Wednesday and Thursday as Zacharias attempted to clean up the mess by claiming some difference between the terms “lawyer” and ‘attorney” before conceding that she’d failed the California bar exam and never retaken it. asserted
she → fester → it
That’s when Wiles appears to have struck. asserted
Wiles → ’ → ?
That night, Zacharia appeared on Fox News host — and close confidant of Trump — Sean Hannity’s program for a train-wreck of an interview that was as bad as, if not worse than, her brief briefing had been days earlier. asserted
briefing → appear → interview
Hannity opened his show by telling Zacharia that her briefing had been "widely panned," then walked Zacharia through the bar exam question until Zacharia admitted that she had never taken it again. asserted
she → open → it
Another hit on the Fox & Friends morning show on Friday didn’t go much better, and by the end of the day, Zacharia was given the boot minutes after Trump told reporters he’d told her she should “reconsider” her decision to take the job. asserted
she → go → job
A source told Politico that the Fox bookings were a "sanctioned hit,” and another source was more blunt,” describing the chief of staff as having “fed her to Hannity." asserted
source → tell → Hannity
Denials were rapid and came from everywhere, with White House Communications Director Steven Cheung calling the report "fiction that's not even creative” and a senior White House official alleging that Wiles "did not need to feed her to Sean or anybody else” because “it's not her style." asserted
it → come → Sean
Fox News told The Independent that Hannity books his own guests and that "Susie Wiles and Danielle Alvarez had nothing to do with the booking." asserted
Wiles → tell → booking
Others suggested that Zacharia had sealed her fate in the briefing room on Tuesday without any help from anyone. uncertain
Zacharia → suggest → anyone
Does any of that matter? asserted
any → matter → that
Not really, because the message sent by the ex-press secretary’s quick ouster was clear. asserted
message → send → ouster
After the president went around his chief of staff to hire an unqualified TV personality as his top spokesperson, his choice was disassembled on his favorite TV channel within 72 hours, leading him to all but fire her himself on the South Lawn while Marine One idled behind him. If anyone spent last week measuring the drapes in the chief of staff’s office, seeing Zacharia’s hide nailed to Wiles’ wall was a useful warning. asserted
hide → go → wall
In contrast to Zacharia, on the short end of the scale, Wiles has lasted longer in her job than anyone Trump has had in it across two administrations, and the West Wing has gone two years without the leak wars that characterized 2017. asserted
that → last → 2017
Going around Wiles to hire the second press secretary of his second term produced, on a compressed schedule, exactly the kind of personnel disaster her process exists to prevent — nobody in the White House vetting even asked Zacharia about the bar exam, as she told Fox & Friends herself the next morning. asserted
she → go → Fox
Trump, who has been known to fib about such things, subsequently said there is "zero chance" he replaces Wiles and that she has his "COMPLETE confidence,” and a White House spokesperson told The Independent last week that "these anonymous sources know nothing." asserted
sources → know → nothing
Meanwhile, the names still being circulated to replace Wiles are mostly men Trump knows from television, from Palm Beach, or from the campaign — the same “central casting” process that just produced five days of Katie Zacharia. asserted
that → circulate → Zacharia
Anyone on that list would do well to study what happened to the last person who arrived by that route. asserted
who → do → route
Wiles' superpower was never that Trump could not go around her. uncertain
Trump → go → her
It was that he did not. asserted
he → do → ?
He did, once, and the entire world got to see how it ended. asserted
it → do → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support