Inside Democrats’ absurd push to downplay noncitizen voting and block Voter ID

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

CA Post Editorial Board. (2026, October 20). Inside Democrats’ absurd push to downplay noncitizen voting and block Voter ID. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/19/opinion/democrats-absurd-push-to-downplay-noncitizen-voting-and-block-voter-id/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-20 · by CA Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

The federal government recently conducted "Operation Protect the Vote," which they claim is the largest voter fraud operation in California's history, arresting individuals suspected of noncitizen voting. The article highlights concerns about lax voting procedures in California, including automatic voter registration and potential widespread ballot harvesting and noncitizen voting, suggesting that at least 20,000 noncitizens may be registered to vote. Democrats in California have dismissed these efforts as insignificant, while the author argues that support for Proposition 39, which would require Voter ID, could help address these issues.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 19, 2026, federal authorities arrested 28 foreign nationals in California as part of "Operation Protect the Vote," a sweep targeting noncitizen voters ahead of the midterm elections. The Justice Department charged these lawful permanent residents with election crimes such as making false statements on naturalization applications and submitting fraudulent voter registrations. Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter emphasized that the DOJ will not tolerate noncitizens voting in federal elections, contrasting this stance with California officials who argue compliance with the demands would be unlawful without specific information from the federal government.

Attorney General Rob Bonta countered by stating these arrests represent an extremely small percentage of registered voters and do not indicate widespread voter fraud. Meanwhile, the Public Interest Legal Foundation documented how sanctuary city policies exacerbate the issue of noncitizen voting in California, underscoring concerns over electoral integrity ahead of the November elections.

Written for “California Noncitizen Voting Arrests” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 92384 (high confidence, 6 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-20

Story

📰 California Noncitizen Voting Arrests
Politics · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles refer to the same specific voter fraud bust in California involving federal agents on October 20, 2026.”
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 8 of 58 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A reports on the DOJ charging 28 noncitizens with voting crimes, while Article B discusses a broader context of voter fraud and supports a Voter ID act.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A describes the Justice Department filing a lawsuit against California for noncitizens being registered to vote, while Article B discusses broader implications and reactions from Democrats regarding voter fraud operations.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 37 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles discuss noncitizen voting issues in California but describe different aspects and perspectives rather than the same specific incident.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 31 📰 publisher trust 59
“While both articles discuss a large-scale federal operation targeting noncitizen voters in California, they differ in focus and time frame: Article A describes the arrests made on a specific day, while Article B discusses broader implications and context of the operation.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Centre further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A reports on the arrests made during a sweep targeting non-citizen voters, while Article B provides commentary and context around the operation without detailing the specific arrests.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 21% hedged 4 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against California over suspected noncitizen voters, while Article B mentions an operation called 'Protect the Vote' and focuses on voter fraud in general and Proposition 39 for Voter ID.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 18 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A describes a lawsuit filed by the DOJ against California, while Article B discusses broader issues of voter fraud and supports Proposition 39 for Voter ID.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 10% hedged 6 of 62 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles discuss related issues of voter fraud and election concerns but describe different perspectives and contexts, not a single specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 11939 article(s) · 33 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 33 correction(s)

Who wrote this

CA Post Editorial Board
55 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The feds called “Operation Protect the Vote” the largest voter fraud bust in state history. And it underscores a basic truth in California: Fraud of all kinds has run amok for years; it needs to end; and state voters in November would do well to support Prop. 39, the Voter ID act — to help ensure that at least part of it does.
🔮 But the state allocated $368.7 million to developers to build dense, low-income housing projects, without any guarantee fire victims would benefit.
🔮 California education officials may pat themselves on the back for a 1% increase in math scores and a 0.5% increase in English scores.
🔮 Democrats knew that if he built that wall, he would be seen as a successful president — and not just as a fluke.
🔮 That’s a question voters will be asking after the city attorney’s latest bombshell report.
🔮 In January 2025, LA Mayor Karen Bass infamously left town for Ghana, despite dire fire warnings.
🔮 But no one will state the obvious, as long as both of them — the Republican who launched it, the Democrat who extended it — agree to keep pretending.
🔮 Now, the Justice Department has given the state and LA County an ultimatum: Review and quarantine ballots that might have been sent to noncitizen voters, or face emergency litigation.
🔮 The students who led a peaceful protest might be commended for their activism — but they are wrong.
🔮 As the California Post has reported, the mill, owned by the San Diego-based Pacific Steel Group, will be the first steel production facility in the state in more than half a century when it opens in 2027.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by CA Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 55 articles by CA Post Editorial Board →

Topics

California Operation Protect the Vote Post Prop. 39, the Voter ID act The California Post

Subjects

California GPE · 11× Democrats NORP · 2× Californians NORP · 1× Dems NORP · 1× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 1× Post ORG · 1× Rob Bonta PERSON · 1× The California Post ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the Trump ORG · 1×

Narrative

The feds called “Operation Protect the Vote” the largest voter fraud bust in state history. And it underscores a basic truth in California: Fraud of all kinds has run amok for years; it needs to end; and state voters in November would do well to support Prop. 39, the Voter ID act — to help ensure that at least part of it does.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20
🔮 The feds called “Operation Protect the Vote” the largest voter fraud bust in state history. And it underscores a basic truth in California: Fraud of all kinds has run amok for years; it needs to end; and state voters in November would do well to support Prop. 39, the Voter ID act — to help ensure that at least part of it does.

Claims (32 extracted, 2 hedged)

The feds called “Operation Protect the Vote” the largest voter fraud bust in state history. And it underscores a basic truth in California: Fraud of all kinds has run amok for years; it needs to end; and state voters in November would do well to support Prop. 39, the Voter ID act — to help ensure that at least part of it does. asserted
part → call → it
Public faith in California’s voting system has faltered, and no wonder: The state has absurdly lax voting procedures. asserted
state → falter → procedures
Sanctuary immigration policies, along with a state system that automatically registers some voters, lead many to wonder just how many noncitizens are tucked into California’s voter rolls. asserted
noncitizens → register → rolls
Last week, the Trump administration suggested that number is at least 20,000, and sued the state over its refusal to segregate those voters’ ballots to resolve eligibility questions before they’re counted. uncertain
they → suggest → questions
Plus, the state has few guardrails on balloting: Officials paper the state with mail-in ballots with little care over who receives them, who completes them or who returns them. asserted
who → have → them
The California Post has documented alleged cases of homeless Skid Row voters who say they were paid a couple of bucks to vote for specified mayoral candidates. asserted
they → document → candidates
The Post has also found thousands of voters registered using the addresses of temporary homeless shelters — with mail-in ballots presumably flowing to those locations automatically each election cycle, despite limited bed space and high turnover. asserted
ballots → find → space
What’s more, ballot harvesting — the practice by which political operatives gather reams of paper ballots and submit them on behalf of others, with few if any controls or oversight — is rampant in California. asserted
operatives → ’ → California
And then there’s the prolonged count after Election Day: California, which takes week to tally ballots, is an international laughingstock. asserted
which → ’ → ballots
The glacial vote-counting further erodes faith in the election process when, time after time, Election Night results are reversed as late ballots dribble in long after voting ostensibly ends. asserted
voting → erode → time
Despite this Dumpster fire, Democrats keep asserting that nothing’s amiss. asserted
nothing → assert → fire
True to character, California Dems derided Monday’s arrests. asserted
Dems → deride → arrests
Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press account on X shared a long series of tweets mocking the operation. asserted
account → share → operation
Others, including Attorney General Rob Bonta — who called the arrests “a drop in the bucket” — were likewise dismissive. asserted
who → include → bucket
That’s not leadership. asserted
That → ’ → ?
That’s defensive evasion. asserted
That → ’ → ?
Why, after all, would any fair-minded person oppose putting a stop to voter fraud, however rare or common? asserted
person → oppose → fraud
Monday’s news affirmed a stark reality: California politicians have shown less than zero interest in ending the state’s vote-system mayhem. asserted
politicians → affirm → mayhem
It’s taken the Trump administration to show that yes, some noncitizens are in fact on California’s voter rolls — and some of them have indeed apparently voted. asserted
some → take → them
Which brings us to what state voters can do to improve election integrity in California: Pass Prop. 39, the Voter ID act on the Nov. 3 ballot. asserted
voters → bring → ballot
The Voter ID measure is straightforward: It would require every voter to either show identification when voting in person, or write the last four digits of an ID number on the ballot envelope if voting by mail. asserted
It → require → mail
That’s it. asserted
That → ’ → ?
This simple step would tie every ballot to a legitimate California voter. asserted
step → tie → voter
It would help prevent noncitizens from voting — rendering federal lawsuits over alleged illegal voting unnecessary. asserted
lawsuits → help → voting
And it would hamper ballot-harvesting machine politics: Political operatives would need to get each voter’s ID number before collecting and submitting large tranches of ballots to be counted. asserted
operatives → hamper → ballots
All those blank ballots perhaps floating around at homeless shelters and elsewhere? asserted
ballots → float → shelters
With voter ID, Californians could be more confident they’re not being completed and returned improperly. uncertain
they → complete → ID
Democrats counter that a Voter ID law would deter people from voting. asserted
law → counter → people
But think about it: Does an ID requirement to buy alcohol deter people from drinking? asserted
requirement → think → people
Seems like the only people Voter ID would deter from voting are people who shouldn’t be voting in the first place. asserted
who → seem → place
Democrats must know that. asserted
Democrats → know → that
Their Bigfoot myth has crumbled. asserted
myth → crumble → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support