Why terrorism laws stopped Sally Rooney selling books in the UK – podcast

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Williams, P. b. N. I. w. Z., Abrahams, H. S. p. b. R., Biggs, E., & Zygadlo, R. (2026, October 20). Why terrorism laws stopped Sally Rooney selling books in the UK – podcast. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2026/oct/20/why-terrorism-laws-stopped-sally-rooney-selling-books-in-the-uk-podcast

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-20 · by Presented by Nosheen Iqbal with Zoe Williams, Haroon Siddique; produced by Ruth Abrahams, Eleanor Biggs, Rudi Zygadlo

Quick Summary

Sally Rooney has stopped selling her books in the UK due to potential prosecution under terrorism laws because she supports Palestine Action, a proscribed terrorist organization according to British law. This decision follows widespread arrests of those supporting the group and an open letter signed by numerous authors backing Rooney’s stance. The controversy has sparked debate with some rightwing media outlets criticizing Rooney's actions.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 14, 2026, Sally Rooney, a critically acclaimed Irish author known for novels such as "Normal People" and "Conversations with Friends," announced her books will no longer be supplied in the UK due to her support for Palestine Action, which is designated as a terrorist organization under British law. In July 2025, Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK government, making its membership or support punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Over 3,700 people have been arrested and around 2,500 charged for alleged support of Palestine Action since then, though no trials have occurred yet due to a legal challenge pending before the Supreme Court.

Rooney's publisher, Faber, confirmed it cannot supply her work in Britain anymore because fulfilling contracts could constitute a "serious criminal offense" under current laws. Rooney stated she will not contest these measures and is prepared for their consequences. Her decision follows her previous announcement that she would donate earnings from her books and TV adaptations to Palestine Action.

With over 6 million copies of her books sold globally, this move marks a significant shift in the literary landscape, reflecting broader debates about national security laws versus free expression rights in the UK.

Written for “Sally Rooney Books Withdrawn UK” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 12 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 92354 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-20

Story

📰 Sally Rooney Books Withdrawn UK
Politics · 13 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 29% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US) · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 39 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe Sally Rooney's novels being withdrawn from sale in the UK due to her support for Palestine Action, a group banned as terrorist under UK law.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 32 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles discuss Sally Rooney's decision to withdraw her books from the UK market due to her support for Palestine Action and the subsequent legal implications under UK terrorism laws.”
TIME
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 48 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss Sally Rooney's decision to no longer sell her books in the U.K. due to her support for Palestine Action and related legal restrictions.”
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 29 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss Sally Rooney's decision to no longer sell her books in the UK due to her support for a pro-Palestinian group designated as a terrorist organization under UK law.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Centre further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss Sally Rooney's books being removed from UK sales due to support for Palestine Action, which is considered a terrorist organization under UK law.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 22 📰 publisher trust 69
“The articles discuss related topics but do not describe the same specific incident; Article A focuses on Sarah Helm's social media post referencing Palestine Action, while Article B discusses Sally Rooney's decision to stop supplying her books due to UK terrorism laws.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses the initial ban on Sally Rooney's books due to her support for Palestine Action, while Article B focuses on the subsequent decision by Rooney and publishers to stop supplying her books in the UK because of terrorism laws.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22 📰 publisher trust 66
“While both articles discuss Sally Rooney's decision to withdraw her book from UK sales due to support for Palestine Action being proscribed as a terrorist organization, Article A focuses on Rooney’s initial statement about supporting the group and the ban that prompted it, whereas Article B discusses the subsequent action of withdrawing books from sale and its implications.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 1 of 6 📰 publisher trust 64
“While both articles discuss similar issues surrounding Sally Rooney's books and a ban related to Palestine Action, they describe different aspects or outcomes.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
7
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
29%
2 of 7 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
13
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2117 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Presented by Nosheen Iqbal with Zoe Williams
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For now there might be a copy or two of Intermezzo left kicking around in your local bookshop – snap it up if you haven’t already, because soon that will be it.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Haroon Siddique; produced by Ruth Abrahams
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For now there might be a copy or two of Intermezzo left kicking around in your local bookshop – snap it up if you haven’t already, because soon that will be it.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Eleanor Biggs
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For now there might be a copy or two of Intermezzo left kicking around in your local bookshop – snap it up if you haven’t already, because soon that will be it.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Rudi Zygadlo
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For now there might be a copy or two of Intermezzo left kicking around in your local bookshop – snap it up if you haven’t already, because soon that will be it.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Palestine Action

Subjects

Rooney PERSON · 3× Palestine Action ORG · 2× Haroon Siddique PERSON · 1× Nosheen Iqbal PERSON · 1× Sally Rooney PERSON · 1× Zoe Williams PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Last year, Sally Rooney said she would be using her royalties to support Palestine Action, a group that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation under UK law.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20
🔮 For now there might be a copy or two of Intermezzo left kicking around in your local bookshop – snap it up if you haven’t already, because soon that will be it.

Claims (7 extracted, 2 hedged)

For now there might be a copy or two of Intermezzo left kicking around in your local bookshop – snap it up if you haven’t already, because soon that will be it. uncertain
that → leave → it
Last year, Sally Rooney said she would be using her royalties to support Palestine Action, a group that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation under UK law. asserted
that → say → law
Since then, thousands of people have been arrested for supporting the group. asserted
thousands → arrest → group
Now, faced with the risk of prosecution under terrorism legislation, Rooney and her publishers have decided to stop supplying her books to retailers in the UK. asserted
Rooney → face → UK
Over the weekend, hundreds of authors signed an open letter supporting her. asserted
hundreds → sign → her
The rightwing press, meanwhile, have called Rooney a “tedious and malicious” “posturing ingrate”. asserted
press → call → Rooney
Zoe Williams explains the furore surrounding one of the most successful novelists of her generation, while Haroon Siddique tells Nosheen Iqbal how Rooney’s stance could affect the supreme court’s ruling on Palestine Action. uncertain
stance → explain → Action
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support