The Aporia
King, R. (2026, October 19). Here’s why Obama admin put Abdul El-Sayed’s sister-in-law on terror watch list as Senate hopeful claims ‘she did nothing wrong’. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/19/us-news/heres-why-obama-admin-put-abdul-el-sayeds-sister-in-law-on-terror-watch-list-amid-claim-she-did-nothing-wrong/
King, Ryan. “Here’s why Obama admin put Abdul El-Sayed’s sister-in-law on terror watch list as Senate hopeful claims ‘she did nothing wrong’.” New York Post, 19 Oct. 2026, https://nypost.com/2026/10/19/us-news/heres-why-obama-admin-put-abdul-el-sayeds-sister-in-law-on-terror-watch-list-amid-claim-she-did-nothing-wrong/.
King, Ryan. “Here’s why Obama admin put Abdul El-Sayed’s sister-in-law on terror watch list as Senate hopeful claims ‘she did nothing wrong’.” New York Post, October 19, 2026. https://nypost.com/2026/10/19/us-news/heres-why-obama-admin-put-abdul-el-sayeds-sister-in-law-on-terror-watch-list-amid-claim-she-did-nothing-wrong/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, confirmed over the weekend that his sister-in-law Mariam Jukaku was involved in a lawsuit challenging her alleged placement on the federal Terrorist Screening Database during the Obama administration. During an interview with Fox News, El-Sayed acknowledged the court documents and defended Jukaku, stating she "did nothing wrong" and successfully challenged her inclusion on the list. The revelation comes days before Barack Obama is scheduled to campaign for El-Sayed in Detroit. According to the lawsuit, which was supported by attorneys from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Jukaku's boarding pass was stamped with "SSSS" when she attempted to board a flight out of Detroit Metropolitan Airport in 2012, indicating her designation as a "known or suspected terrorist." The federal government typically does not confirm or deny such listings. While an initial ruling favored the plaintiffs, an appeals court overturned that decision in 2021, and a separate damages case was dismissed.