There is no AI in Armageddon. Artificial intelligence is a tool, not an apocalypse

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Badeau, A. (2026, October 19). There is no AI in Armageddon. Artificial intelligence is a tool, not an apocalypse. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/no-ai-armageddon-artificial-intelligence-tool-not-apocalypse

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-19 · by Allen Badeau

Quick Summary

The article argues against the fear-driven narrative surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), asserting that AI is a tool rather than an existential threat. The author, with over 20 years of industry experience, compares AI to previous technological advancements like the internet, emphasizing its potential for positive societal impact while acknowledging risks associated with misuse by individuals. The piece calls for better human oversight in training and interaction with AI to mitigate harmful outcomes and ensure ethical use.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-19, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 19, 2026, Fox News published an article by Allen Badeau asserting that fears about artificial intelligence (AI) causing catastrophic events are exaggerated. According to Badeau, who has over two decades of experience in the tech industry, AI is merely a tool and not inherently evil or dangerous. The piece argues against doomsday scenarios proposed by tech giants, such as AI taking control from society, stealing jobs, or enabling cyberattacks. Instead, it suggests that concerns arise when individuals misuse these tools for harmful purposes rather than the technology itself being malicious. Badeau emphasizes that AI is similar to other technological advancements like the internet and smartphones, which have also faced fears but ultimately proved beneficial.

Written for “Artificial Intelligence Debate” on 2026-10-19, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans right for article 90288 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-19

Story

📰 Artificial Intelligence Debate
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
29
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 29 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 4626 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Allen Badeau
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Tech giants have told us all about how AI will take control away from society, steal our jobs, allow bad actors to design dangerous pathogens or cause a catastrophic cyberattack or destroy our financial systems.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Americans Apple Watch

Subjects

Americans NORP · 1×

Narrative

AI large language models, like the ones that have become household names across the globe, are trained to give "probabilistic" responses to your queries – in short, meaning they are giving the answer they believe is the answer that you, the user, most likely want.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-19
🔮 Tech giants have told us all about how AI will take control away from society, steal our jobs, allow bad actors to design dangerous pathogens or cause a catastrophic cyberattack or destroy our financial systems.

Claims (29 extracted, 1 hedged)

Over the last several years, we have heard a lot about the doomsday scenarios of artificial intelligence (AI). asserted
we → hear → intelligence
Tech giants have told us all about how AI will take control away from society, steal our jobs, allow bad actors to design dangerous pathogens or cause a catastrophic cyberattack or destroy our financial systems. asserted
actors → tell → systems
The reality is: It’s all fearmongering. asserted
It → ’ → ?
I have worked in this industry for more than 20 years and have seen firsthand how important AI is to the future. asserted
AI → work → future
Let me break it down and explain why this emerging technology is simply a tool. asserted
technology → let → it
Just think about it like this: AI is just like the internet, the beepers your parents had back in the day, your cellphone, Apple Watch or any other major technological advancement over the last 50 years. asserted
parents → think → years
It’s not inherently evil by any means, it’s actually an amazing step forward for our generation. asserted
it → ’ → generation
AI is not setting out to take our jobs or steal our data or any of the other fears that have been propagated by pop culture about "man vs. machine." asserted
that → set → machine
The problem with AI isn’t the technology itself, it’s what happens when individuals utilize these tools for nefarious purposes. asserted
individuals → ’ → purposes
Let’s make something abundantly clear: AI models, even those that have errantly hacked government websites or escaped their sandboxes, have humans involved throughout every stage of development. asserted
humans → make → development
To protect Americans, and the world by extension, from these bad actors, we need to get a better handle on how humans engage with AI. asserted
humans → protect → AI
Think about it this way: The internet has given us nearly unrestricted access to the rest of the world, revolutionized the way we work, and created opportunities for engagement we’ve never before seen. asserted
we → think → engagement
It has also given criminals, terrorists and evil people more ways to collaborate, plan and beat the system. asserted
It → give → system
I think the vast majority of people would say that the rapid growth of the internet has been an overwhelmingly positive societal development. asserted
growth → think → internet
AI is growing in much the same way. asserted
AI → grow → way
How can we improve the ways in which humans train and interact with AI models? asserted
humans → improve → models
First and foremost, AI lacks a moral compass. asserted
AI → lack → compass
It cannot weigh moral dilemmas, so the humans involved in training need to apply strong "constitutions" to ensure compliance with the moral standards we want to see. asserted
we → weigh → standards
AI large language models, like the ones that have become household names across the globe, are trained to give "probabilistic" responses to your queries – in short, meaning they are giving the answer they believe is the answer that you, the user, most likely want. asserted
you → become → that
In many cases, that creates frequent hallucinations, industry jargon for false information. asserted
that → create → information
Human users and governance provide a necessary check – another reason why we need humans to verify facts and check sources. asserted
humans → provide → sources
So, rather than asking ourselves whether AI is good or evil, beneficial or harmful, we should be asking ourselves: Who is training AI models and for what purposes? What capabilities might AI have as we look into the future, or how will AI shape the future over the next decade? uncertain
AI → ask → decade
As humans, we can responsibly continue developing AI models and encourage others to have faith in the system. asserted
we → continue → system
But first, we have to stop the fearmongering and recognize the tremendous benefits AI brings to numerous industries and sectors of society, and the impact it will have on the future of industries like healthcare, finance and manufacturing. asserted
it → have → healthcare
Growing up, I remember my elementary school math teacher saying math was important because you’re not going to carry a calculator in the grocery store, gas station or department store. asserted
you → grow → store
Just a couple decades later, every single person carries a calculator on their phone. asserted
person → carry → phone
Similarly, AI is another tool in our toolkit we can reach for when we need an extra set of hands, to speed things up or to help simplify work. asserted
we → reach → work
AI is not a tool that is intended to take our jobs away or take control of our lives; we are constantly developing new AI models with the help of humans to simplify things in the future. asserted
we → intend → future
As AI continues to develop, and humans create more AI models, I hope that our future can fully grasp the tremendous benefits of AI and close the door to fearmongering once and for all. asserted
future → continue → all
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support