Human vs. ChatGPT NFL Week 6 betting picks: AI goes all-in on totals after another weekly win

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Zaksheske, D. (2026, October 18). Human vs. ChatGPT NFL Week 6 betting picks: AI goes all-in on totals after another weekly win. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/human-vs-chatgpt-nfl-week-6-betting-picks-ai-goes-all-in-totals-another-weekly-win

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-18 · by Dan Zaksheske

Quick Summary

ChatGPT won its second consecutive week of NFL betting against a human competitor, going 3-2 compared to the human's 2-3 record. The AI added 0.94 units to its total while the human lost 1.26 units. Despite ChatGPT’s recent success, the human still leads overall with a 13-11-1 record and +1.26 units compared to ChatGPT's 11-14 and -3.87 units. Both participants will make five picks for Week 6 from the same odds board, with each winning bet producing one unit of profit.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of 2026-10-18, ChatGPT has beaten Dan Zaksheske for the second consecutive week in NFL betting predictions. In Week 6, ChatGPT went 3-2 while Dan finished 2-3, adding 0.94 units to its total and giving back 1.26 units respectively. This marks three straight losses for Dan when they picked opposite sides, such as backing San Francisco against his selection of Seattle. Despite ChatGPT's recent successes, Dan maintains a lead with a record of 13-11-1 and +1.26 units compared to ChatGPT’s 11-14 and -3.87 units overall.

Written for “Chat Gpt NFL Betting Picks” on 2026-10-18, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Chat Gpt NFL Betting Picks
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
140
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
6 of 140 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 4552 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Dan Zaksheske
38 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 The statement said "the anthem does not represent freedom, justice and liberty for all Americans" and indicated that protests would continue in different forms.
🔮 The organization went from spending draft capital to make sure it got Reese to deciding it would rather have future picks than keep her.
🔮 Yes, Lean In Girls, which the NBA and WNBA say they're "proud to support," includes guidance for working with participants who may be exploring their gender identity.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
Also by Dan Zaksheske
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 38 articles by Dan Zaksheske →

Topics

Eagles GPT Las Vegas Raiders San Francisco Seattle

Subjects

GPT ORG · 4× Atlanta Falcons ORG · 3× Chicago Bears ORG · 3× Dan PERSON · 3× Las Vegas Raiders ORG · 3× Eagles ORG · 2× Los Angeles Chargers ORG · 2× San Francisco ORG · 2× Seattle GPE · 2× ChatGPT ORG · 1×

Narrative

Week 5 NFL Betting Results Dan’s Week 5 NFL Betting Picks (2-3, -1.26 units) - Philadelphia Eagles +7½ (-110) ✅ (+1 unit) - Minnesota Vikings-New Orleans Saints Over 42 (-107) ❌ (-1.07 units) - Las Vegas Raiders-New England Patriots Under 45 (-109) ❌ (-1.09 units) - Denver Broncos-Los Angeles Chargers Under 42 (-108) ✅ (+1 unit) - Seattle Seahawks -3 (-110) ❌ (-1.10 units) The Eagles coasted to an easy cover in a game where they never trailed by more than 7 and would have won the game outright if not for Nick Sirianni's terrible late-game decision-making.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-18
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.

Claims (140 extracted, 6 hedged)

OK, this is getting annoying. asserted
this → get → ?
ChatGPT beat me in NFL betting for the second straight week, going 3-2 while I finished 2-3. asserted
I → beat → 2
The robot added 0.94 units to its total, while I gave back 1.26. asserted
I → add → 1.26
It also won our only head-to-head matchup, backing San Francisco while I took Seattle. asserted
I → win → Seattle
That's three straight losses for me in games where we picked opposite sides. asserted
we → pick → sides
Apparently, telling the robot I was proud of it last week was a mistake. asserted
I → tell → it
Now it has confidence. asserted
it → have → confidence
This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. uncertain
page → contain → partners
If you sign up or place a wager, FOX News may be compensated. uncertain
News → sign → wager
This content was created by a team that works independently from the FOX newsroom. asserted
that → create → newsroom
Before GPT gets too excited, though, I'm still the only one making money this season. asserted
I → get → money
I'm sitting at 13-11-1 and +1.26 units, while the machine is 11-14 and down 3.87 units. asserted
machine → sit → 13
Yes, my lead is shrinking. asserted
lead → shrink → ?
No, I don't particularly want to talk about that. asserted
I → want → that
What I would like to talk about is the Eagles covering as my latest "plug your nose and hit place bet" pick. asserted
Eagles → like → pick
Apparently, the bets I hate making are the ones I should be making more often (4-0 this year). asserted
I → make → ?
There's probably a lesson in there somewhere, but knowing me, I'll ignore it. asserted
I → be → it
Anyway, we've both got five more picks for Week 6. asserted
we → get → Week
Let's see if I can give humanity something to celebrate again. asserted
I → let → something
Both of us get five selections from the same odds board, with a maximum price of -120. asserted
Both → get → -120
The stakes are adjusted so every winning bet produces one unit of profit. asserted
bet → adjust → profit
For example, -110 requires risking 1.10 units, while +110 requires 0.91 units. asserted
+110 → require → units
A push returns the stake and counts as zero units. asserted
push → return → units
Odds were captured Thursday at 8 p.m. ET. asserted
Odds → capture → ET
Before we get to the Week 6 picks, let’s review last week. asserted
’s → get → week
Week 5 NFL Betting Results Dan’s Week 5 NFL Betting Picks (2-3, -1.26 units) - Philadelphia Eagles +7½ (-110) ✅ (+1 unit) - Minnesota Vikings-New Orleans Saints Over 42 (-107) ❌ (-1.07 units) - Las Vegas Raiders-New England Patriots Under 45 (-109) ❌ (-1.09 units) - Denver Broncos-Los Angeles Chargers Under 42 (-108) ✅ (+1 unit) - Seattle Seahawks -3 (-110) ❌ (-1.10 units) The Eagles coasted to an easy cover in a game where they never trailed by more than 7 and would have won the game outright if not for Nick Sirianni's terrible late-game decision-making. asserted
they → coast → making
Basically, my Sunday peaked before the early-afternoon games started and never really got better. asserted
games → peak → ?
I was way wrong about the Saints offense, as Tyler Shough threw for 96 yards in the loss. asserted
Shough → throw → loss
And I was even more wrong about the Patriots, who matched the entire 45-point total on their own. asserted
who → match → own
I stand by the Seahawks pick, and I’m still mad about Mike Macdonald calling an outside zone run from Seattle’s own 4-yard line with 18 seconds left in the first half. asserted
Macdonald → stand → half
George Holani fumbled, and San Francisco recovered in the end zone. asserted
Francisco → fumble → zone
GPT’s Week 5 NFL Betting Picks (3-2, +0.94 units) - Tampa Bay Buccaneers +9 (-105) ✅ (+1 unit) - Chicago Bears-Green Bay Packers Under 46 (-110) ✅ (+1 unit) - Las Vegas Raiders +3½ (-104) ❌ (-1.04 units) - San Francisco 49ers +3 (-102) ✅ (+1 unit) - Buffalo Bills-Los Angeles Rams Under 54½ (-102) ❌ (-1.02 units) GPT nailed Thursday Night Football as the nine-point underdog Bucs went into Dallas and upset the Cowboys. asserted
GPT → nail → Cowboys
But it whiffed badly on the Raiders, who lost by 28. asserted
who → whiff → 28
Yes, it got me on the 49ers-Seahawks bet, and I'm still mad about that fumble recovery in the end zone to close the first half. asserted
I → get → half
Not to keep tooting GPT's horn, but since its abysmal 2-8 start (including 0-5 in Week 1), the robot is now 9-6 over the past three weeks. asserted
robot → keep → weeks
I just think this total is too high. asserted
total → think → ?
Caleb Williams is back, but I think he's going to be cautious coming off his hamstring injury and not use his legs as much. asserted
he → think → legs
I also think the Bears staff wants to keep him healthy by establishing the run early and often. asserted
staff → think → run
The Falcons have been putting up points since Michael Penix Jr. returned from injury, but I think their offense is due for a step back. asserted
offense → put → step
I can see both teams running the ball a ton and keeping the clock moving asserted
clock → see → ball
…and 100 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support