Democrats’ ‘debanking’ abuses show they’re the big threat to democracy

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Post Editorial Board. (2026, October 17). Democrats’ ‘debanking’ abuses show they’re the big threat to democracy. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/17/opinion/democrats-debanking-abuses-show-theyre-the-big-threat-to-democracy/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-17 · by Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released a report revealing that nine major banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, used political criteria to deny services to lawful consumers based on their affiliations or business practices. The investigation covered over 100,000 consumer complaints and 50,000 internal bank documents, highlighting instances where banks like PNC refused credit lines to businesses labeled as conservative by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The article argues that this trend began under Democratic influence and warns of potential future abuses if not addressed, advocating for regulatory action from bodies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Board.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced on Wednesday that nine of the nation’s largest banks had policies in place between 2020 and 2025 which may have influenced decisions to deny or limit financial services to customers based on their political, religious beliefs, or lawful business activities. This includes major institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, who reportedly used purely political criteria to exclude certain consumers from banking services. The OCC investigation covered more than 100,000 consumer complaints and reviewed over 50,000 internal bank documents. Democrats have been criticized for using these practices as a means to restrict financial access based on ideological grounds, which some argue can be financially devastating for individuals and businesses deemed politically incorrect or extreme.

Written for “Debanking Abuses In Banking” on 2026-10-18, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 87788 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-18

Story

📰 Debanking Abuses In Banking
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Free Press
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 33% hedged 1 of 3 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles discuss the federal regulators' announcement about debanking policies of nine large banks between 2020 and 2025, citing the same report from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 11294 article(s) · 32 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 32 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Post Editorial Board
86 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Democrats show no shame or regret over the OCC findings, making it plain that the extremists still call the shots — and will stay in the driver’s seat for the foreseeable future.
🔮 History will judge harshly an American administration that enables this horror.
🔮 It’s now certain that fewer than 9,000 homeowners will have to pay it, though Gov. Kathy Hochul and Mayor Zohran Mamdani counted on 13,000 to pony up, raising $500 million for the city’s budget.
🔮 Plus: Unlike other tech kings, he keeps producing physical wonders — flying cars, rockets that land back at their cradle —in-your-face stuff that makes the brightness of the future viscerally real in a way that no chatbot or online marvel ever will.
🔮 Dems’ Deal With Israel-Haters Aligning “with the international left on Israel” may offer Democratic leaders “short-term relief but create hellish problems” later, warns The Wall Street Journal’s Barton Swaim.
🔮 Sorry: The deal between Mayor Zohran Mamdani and City Council Speaker Julie Menin to shut down the Central Park carriage trade is as much of a compromise as the Hitler-Stalin Pact, with the horses and their drivers stuck playing Poland.
🔮 With each passing day, it’s ever more certain: Social Security benefits for the elderly will fall — dramatically — by 2032 . . . because Washington is too scared to act.
🔮 They also have no answer for “the hundreds of thousands of immigrants who enter legally but then illegally overstay their visas” — “other than to grant them citizenship,” which will only invite “millions more to stay.”
🔮 Here’s one “affordability” villain Mayor Zohran Mamdani doesn’t want you knowing about: City Hall.
🔮 We expect Mayor Zohran Mamdani to stand firm against House hopeful Darializa Avila Chevalier and other blockheads now demanding the head of Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who’s doing her job in keeping the city safe.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 86 articles by Post Editorial Board →

Topics

Americans Democrats OCC Washington the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Subjects

OCC ORG · 5× Democrats NORP · 3× Americans NORP · 2× America First ORG · 1× Bank of America ORG · 1× JPMorgan ORG · 1× JPMorgan Chase ORG · 1× MAGA ORG · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ORG · 1×

Narrative

Consider Wednesday’s blockbuster report from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency outlining how nine big banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, used purely political criteria to deny services to perfectly lawful consumers — when getting “debanked” is often a financial death sentence.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-18
🔮 Democrats show no shame or regret over the OCC findings, making it plain that the extremists still call the shots — and will stay in the driver’s seat for the foreseeable future.

Claims (18 extracted, 0 hedged)

With Democrats poised to regain much of their Washington muscle, it’s ever more urgent to notice how they abused that power so recently. asserted
they → poise → power
Consider Wednesday’s blockbuster report from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency outlining how nine big banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, used purely political criteria to deny services to perfectly lawful consumers — when getting “debanked” is often a financial death sentence. asserted
debanked → consider → consumers
And the debankers regularly relied on the hatemongering-for-profit Southern Poverty Law Center as an authority for who to ban. asserted
who → rely → authority
This was no small abuse: The OCC investigation covered more than 100,000 consumer complaints and 50,000 internal bank documents. asserted
investigation → cover → complaints
A JPMorgan payment platform booted merchants with “MAGA” and “America First” in their profiles — and another for working with a group whose “crime” was that a member accurately described the Black Lives Matter movement as Marxist. asserted
member → boot → Marxist
PNC refused a credit line to an outfit that, per the bank’s internal docs, “funded several Christian conservative groups, including several identified as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center” and whose owner was “a conservative political commentator.” asserted
owner → refuse → Center
Yes, this largely happened under President Joe Biden and subsided once he was gone — but the push for it started long before. asserted
push → happen → it
In 2019, for example, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez publicly argued, “Not everything has to be done through legislation explicitly” of her and her party’s own efforts to stop banks working with “evil” industries like firearms and oil and gas. asserted
banks → argue → firearms
And banks followed those political signals. asserted
banks → follow → signals
Wells Fargo declined to lend money to two firearms businesses; BofA axed private-prison businesses over “changing policymaker attitudes.” asserted
BofA → decline → attitudes
The woke crusade against disfavored industries and speech was, of course, always going to end with average Americans getting punished for lawful behavior. asserted
Americans → disfavor → behavior
It also ended up hurting leftists as well: Capital One refused to bank a group devoted to “reproductive rights [that was] synonymous with abortion and the Dems.” asserted
that → end → abortion
These OCC findings are an ugly echo of recent revelations from the Senate Judiciary Committee that special prosecutor Jack Smith, in his Ahab-like pursuit of President Donald Trump, illegally surveilled thousands of Americans for the crime of donating tiny amounts to the president’s campaign. asserted
Smith → surveille → campaign
The nine banks the OCC report names promise not to abuse again; that’s far from sufficient. asserted
that → name → ?
If the OCC doesn’t take action, the Consumer Financial Protection Board should exercise its broad enforcement powers here to permanently make debanking efforts expensive and risk-laden for anyone engaging in them. asserted
efforts → take → them
Don’t leave the door open for Woke 2 Democrats to outdo the “craaazy” Woke 1 crew: Just imagine the financial sanctions against people who object to gender extremism, criticize Hamas, don’t want open borders or support locking up criminals. asserted
who → leave → criminals
Democrats show no shame or regret over the OCC findings, making it plain that the extremists still call the shots — and will stay in the driver’s seat for the foreseeable future. asserted
extremists → show → future
Unless and until the normies reclaim their party, every Democratic victory adds a new threat to our democracy. asserted
victory → reclaim → democracy
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support