Every few years since 1972, computers, financial institutions, communications networks and other systems have had to reset their clocks by a single second.
asserted
computers → have → second
On Thursday, the international authority on timekeeping voted to abolish this contentious quirk of global synchronisation.
asserted
authority → vote → synchronisation
The change will take effect in 2027.
asserted
change → take → 2027
In a meeting of officials from the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, or BIPM, in France, the group axed the leap second, which had been established to align our clocks with Earth’s rotation.
asserted
which → ax → rotation
The practice was similar to that of the leap year, when an extra day is added to our calendars to keep us in sync with Earth’s orbit around the sun.
asserted
day → add → sun
Leap years are predictable, happening every four years.
asserted
years → happen → ?
But leap seconds account for seemingly random irregularities in how fast Earth rotates, which has been causing trouble for timekeepers, including the looming possibility of needing a “negative leap second” because Earth’s spin is getting faster.
asserted
spin → account → second
“This decision has become particularly timely because recent changes in the Earth’s rotation have raised the possibility of a first-ever negative leap second, which has never been experienced and that could create additional risks for critical infrastructures,” Noel Dimarcq, president of the BIPM’s committee for time and frequency, said in a statement.
uncertain
Dimarcq → become → statement
In lieu of the added second, humankind will wait until an entire hour is needed to bring us back into synchronisation with the planet’s spin.
asserted
hour → add → spin
This new practice is “just easier” to keep track of, said Patrizia Tavella, director of the bureau’s time department.
asserted
Tavella → keep → department
It’s unclear when this extra hour may be needed, but it might not happen for centuries.
uncertain
it → ’ → centuries
“It’s really just taking the problem well, well into the future,” said Andrew Novick, an electrical engineer and manager of the time and frequency division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, in Maryland.
asserted
Novick → take → Maryland
“It could be thousands of years before this leap hour happens.
uncertain
hour → happen → ?
For much of history, “the Earth was the best available clock”, Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, explained during the meeting.
asserted
Agnew → explain → meeting
Keeping time mostly involved ways of dividing how long it takes Earth to complete one rotation on its axis: Earth rotates at about 1000 mp/h (1600 km/h) on average, so a day equals 86,400 seconds.
asserted
day → keep → seconds
By the mid-20th century, humans needed more timekeeping precision to support the advent of computers, international communications systems and space exploration.
asserted
humans → need → computers
Enter atomic clocks, which measure time by tracking the tiny changes atoms undergo at regular intervals.
asserted
atoms → enter → intervals
These ultra-precise clocks ushered in a global way of keeping time: Coordinated Universal Time, or UTC, which was adopted in 1963.
asserted
which → usher → 1963
“You only know how good your clock is when you get a better clock,” Novick said.
asserted
Novick → know → clock
Sometimes gravitational interactions with other celestial bodies or the movements of air, water and rock on our dynamic planet can affect its rotation speed.
asserted
interactions → affect → speed
Once clocks became more precise, these subtle shifts in Earth’s rotation became more noticeable, which is why we adopted the leap second.
asserted
we → become → second
In recent decades, though, the added second posed two main problems for our digital systems.
asserted
second → add → systems
For starters, it can be a hassle to change the time by a single second and could even cause time-linked systems to temporarily shut down.
uncertain
systems → change → second
Some tech giants such as Google adopted a “leap smear” instead, temporarily slowing down their clocks rather than adding the leap.
asserted
giants → adopt → leap
What’s more, Earth’s rotation isn’t always lagging behind.
asserted
rotation → ’ → ?
The same forces that slow it down can also work in reverse, meaning that one day we might have a negative leap second.
uncertain
we → slow → second
And while most of the digital systems that rely on UTC are prepared to jump ahead, far fewer have the code built in to handle a move backward in time.
asserted
code → rely → time
Since the 2000s, Earth’s rotation has been speeding up, driven by a combination of changes to Earth’s core and surface phenomena like the melting polar ice caps.
asserted
rotation → speed → caps
This makes the need for a negative leap second more likely, and, in part, drove timekeepers to their decision to end the leap second.
asserted
need → make → second
Delegates from Russia, whose satellites often have a built-in system for handling leap seconds, voted against the measure, and those from Belarus abstained.
asserted
those → have → Belarus
The differential between our clocks and Earth’s rotation is currently hovering around zero, meaning the next leap second could have easily been a negative one, Novick said.
uncertain
Novick → hover → zero
Still, Novick and other scientists said they will miss this little idiosyncrasy in the way we keep time.
asserted
we → say → time
“It’s the one time you could almost assure that NIST would be on the news,” Novick said, “because it gets people thinking about the Earth’s rotation, and about time.”
uncertain
people → ’ → time
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
asserted
article → appear → Times
The Aporia
