Centrists Are Soft-Launching the Idea That We Have a Little Too Much Democracy

The Intercept · collected 2026-09-14 · by Dylan Gyauch-Lewis
Read the original at The Intercept ↗

Summary

Dylan, a senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project, discusses how centrist liberals are increasingly expressing skepticism towards mass participation in democracy and grassroots fundraising within the Democratic Party. These views argue that small-dollar donors push Democrats away from appealing to median voters, while also suggesting that high-dollar contributions cater more to wealthy interests. The article highlights examples of this sentiment in recent years, including concerns over left-economic populism and right-chauvinistic "populism," which centrist thinkers view as a threat to the ideological middle ground they advocate for.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
79
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
3%
2 of 79 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
97.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Dylan Gyauch-Lewis, a senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project (RDP), highlights growing concerns among centrist liberals about American democracy. These thought leaders are increasingly advocating for reduced public participation in government and politics. Notably, Matthew Yglesias recently suggested that fewer engaged people could be beneficial. Additionally, there is hostility toward small-dollar donors, with some arguing that Democrats should move away from relying on such contributions due to the perceived liberal leanings of these donors, which they believe push the party too far left. This narrative echoes earlier worries about populism's threat to democracy raised by political commentator Andrew Sullivan during Donald Trump's first presidential run.

Written for “Democracy Debate Heats Up” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 8743: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-09-14

Story

📰 Democracy Debate Heats Up
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 2 of 14
“The articles discuss different topics related to political views and democracy but describe separate events without overlapping time or place.”

Publisher

The Intercept · 43 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Dylan Gyauch-Lewis
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Years ago, as Donald Trump was first running for the presidency, political commentator Andrew Sullivan worried in a lengthy manifesto that too much populism would serve to “repeal” democracy.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

American Democrats Economic Media Project RDP the Revolving Door Project

Subjects

American NORP · 3× Democrats NORP · 2× Centrists NORP · 1× Dylan PERSON · 1× Economic Media Project ORG · 1× Matthew Yglesias PERSON · 1× RDP ORG · 1× Twitter ORG · 1× the Abundance Network ORG · 1× the Revolving Door Project ORG · 1×

Narrative

Even more unfortunate is that in a moment where our country is as close as it has ever gotten to full-blown authoritarianism, centrist thought leaders are flirting with the very ideas that justify the evisceration of popular democracy: that people cannot be trusted to take an active role in their own government, that there is a class of elites better positioned to lead, and that we ought to get out of the way of our betters.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 Years ago, as Donald Trump was first running for the presidency, political commentator Andrew Sullivan worried in a lengthy manifesto that too much populism would serve to “repeal” democracy.

Claims (79 extracted, 2 hedged)

Dylan is a senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project, where she leads RDP’s Economic Media Project. asserted
she → lead → Project
In case anyone was starting to feel that American democracy is just a little too secure, distaste for the common man is now finding purchase beyond the political right, with centrist liberals test-running their own brand of distaste for mass participation. asserted
liberals → start → participation
Over the past two years, centrist liberal writers have been emboldened to expressly call for less public participation in government and politics, sometimes just coming right out and saying, “What we need is fewer engaged people,” as prolific pedant Matthew Yglesias recently said over on the reanimated corpse of Twitter. asserted
Yglesias → embolden → Twitter
In external communications, we’ve heard notions like Democrats needing to “move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors.” asserted
Democrats → hear → donors
In writing not meant for a wide audience, the honest assessment from the Abundance Network is more extreme: Widespread grassroots fundraising “makes politics dumber.” asserted
politics → mean → Network
The reasoning is that such donors tend to be more liberal than traditional big-dollar supporters and, as a result, push Democrats away from the preferences of the median voter. asserted
donors → tend → voter
But in reality, the moderation bought by high-dollar contributions only serves to further cater to the interests of the wealthy. asserted
moderation → buy → wealthy
Centrists have taken to characterizing the dueling ascendance of left-economic populism and right-chauvinistic “populism” as a pincer movement against the righteous “vital center.” asserted
Centrists → take → center
In recent years, centrist publications have been replete with examples, urgently calling to safeguard liberalism, often from the masses. asserted
publications → call → masses
The irony is that a leading contender for the ur-problem of liberalism’s failures is the purposeful destruction — by centrist liberals — of the organizing capacity that powered the postwar liberal order: organized labor, civil rights organizations, and robust state-level party infrastructure. asserted
that → lead → order
Years ago, as Donald Trump was first running for the presidency, political commentator Andrew Sullivan worried in a lengthy manifesto that too much populism would serve to “repeal” democracy. asserted
populism → run → democracy
His conflating “liberalism” with a liberal technocratic elite class is a hallmark of the centrist canon. asserted
conflating → conflate → canon
This thinking has morphed into what could be called “Grownup Liberalism,” the belief that there is a class of wonky centrist experts who could fix so many things if the confused masses would just get out of their way — a notion that’s inherently undemocratic and increasingly discordant with the actual state of American politics. uncertain
that → morph → politics
As the center tries to cling to the tatters of institutional deference and justify why, even after building the hellscape we inhabit, they alone can steward our future, the right is waging an intense fight against the foundations of liberal society writ large. asserted
right → try → society
Republicans set off a gerrymandering war that reached its acme with Missouri trying to hoodwink federal courts into signing off on an illegal congressional map. asserted
Missouri → set → map
Mail-in voting is under assault, and the SAVE Act, which risks endangering the rights of millions of Americans to vote, has been a conservative hobby horse for over a year. asserted
which → mail → year
To some, the mixed results of these efforts might show that institutionalists are the dam holding back an authoritarian flood. uncertain
institutionalists → show → flood
But these are the same institutionalists who dismantled the Voting Rights Act, created (nearly) carte blanche immunity for the president out of thin air, and opted not to enforce the law, emboldening further authoritarian power grabs. asserted
who → dismantle → grabs
Now, however, the pontification on whether the little people have too much power is increasingly focused on American democracy as an institution. asserted
people → focus → institution
Much of the faddish “Abundance” movement draws heavily on the argument from Yale history professor Paul Sabin’s “Public Citizens” that providing new avenues for the public in politics undermined the project of liberal democracy itself. asserted
providing → draw → democracy
Some proponents have long championed a view of political dynamics centered on liberal and conservative elites dueling intellectually. asserted
elites → champion → dynamics
Others explicitly believe that politics can only marshal material change when titans of industry take the lead, and some (to varying degrees) support ideas like the “network state,” which would replace democratic republicanism with techno-libertarian flavored fascism. asserted
which → believe → fascism
Abundance is just one strain of moderate-coded politics turning more and more of a cold shoulder to the idea of governance by the people. asserted
Abundance → cod → people
Not to be outdone, Third Way — a think tank that answers the question: What if we took all the preening and posturing of the Democratic Leadership Council but left out the charisma? — has been on a tear seeking to limit regular people’s input in political decision-making. asserted
we → outdo → making
The organization has tried to cast the idea of taking any economically populist position as caving to a “purity test” by the left and called for ending reliance on grassroots fundraising. asserted
organization → try → fundraising
Never one to sit out the action, The Atlantic ran a review on September 1 of a Howard Zinn biography with the subhead “The historian believed that empowering the people would improve society. asserted
empowering → sit → society
History hasn’t always proved him right.” asserted
him → prove → ?
“One can agree with Zinn on the power of the people to make change and still wonder whether recent history has revealed the limits of his wisdom,” the author writes. asserted
author → agree → wisdom
But, he adds, the fact that conservatism has marshaled popular support “confounds his almost mythic sense of ‘the people’ as inevitably on the right side of history.” asserted
conservatism → add → history
That is, ordinary folks have shown that they sometimes back distasteful conservative trends, so maybe we should stop empowering them. asserted
we → show → them
Over at The Argument — the venture capital-funded Substack run by former Atlantic writer Jerusalem Demsas — the editor-in-chief recently attacked Democratic Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy’s book on the common good as a “cult” in a sophomoric essay, which went so far as to condemn “the growing obsession with the common good among the postliberal right and left.” asserted
which → fund → right
Across the board, the message is that common people need to get their noses out of politics, go back to trusting the liberal technocrats, and maybe have a little democracy once in a while, as a treat. asserted
people → need → treat
It’s both stunning to see the contempt for popular government coming from the self-appointed champions of liberal thought and totally predictable for the vestiges of neoliberal power to veer away from democracy. asserted
vestiges → ’ → democracy
At its core, the central premise of neoliberal thought is that the market must be the benchmark, with governance subverted to its will, and crucial economic policy cordoned off from the whims of popular rule. asserted
policy → subvert → rule
The bits about pro-corporate media figures and billionaire-funded political operatives throwing conferences about how we need more elite influence practically write themselves. asserted
we → fund → themselves
Unfortunately, these are not niche figures who can be disarmed as mere old men yelling at clouds. asserted
who → disarm → clouds
Collectively, there are hundreds of millions of dollars flowing into organizations that are explicitly anti-small money in politics and want to make Democrats more allegiant to a wealthy donor class. asserted
Democrats → be → class
Even more unfortunate is that in a moment where our country is as close as it has ever gotten to full-blown authoritarianism, centrist thought leaders are flirting with the very ideas that justify the evisceration of popular democracy: that people cannot be trusted to take an active role in their own government, that there is a class of elites better positioned to lead, and that we ought to get out of the way of our betters. asserted
we → get → betters
This is a powerful illustration of how neoliberal politics warped postwar liberalism into a grotesque version of itself. asserted
politics → warp → itself
The postwar consensus centered around the idea that in the duality of American liberalism, democracy is the senior partner and free markets the junior. asserted
markets → center → liberalism
…and 39 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support