The Aporia
Hallas, E. (2026, October 17). Appeals court presses hard against Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4769824/court-press-trump-argument-presidential-record-act/
Hallas, Emily. “Appeals court presses hard against Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records.” Washington Examiner, 17 Oct. 2026, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4769824/court-press-trump-argument-presidential-record-act/.
Hallas, Emily. “Appeals court presses hard against Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records.” Washington Examiner, October 17, 2026. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4769824/court-press-trump-argument-presidential-record-act/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
A federal appeals court is likely to reject President Donald Trump's argument that the 1978 Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. This act requires presidential papers and documents to be retained by the government rather than becoming private property of a former president. The case, which centers around accusations that Trump violated this law by storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home, was heard in a D.C. Circuit court on Friday. Trump's legal team argues against the act, but the Justice Department has been presenting arguments supporting its validity and enforcement.