Steele-John probe should examine Greens processes, publish key findings: WA MPs

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Chrysanthos, N. (2026, October 17). Steele-John probe should examine Greens processes, publish key findings: WA MPs. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/steele-john-probe-should-examine-greens-processes-publish-key-findings-wa-mps-20261017-p616cm.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-10-17 · by Natassia Chrysanthos

Quick Summary

Western Australian Green Party MPs have called for their party to release key findings from its investigation into Senator Jordon Steele-John and to review internal processes used in handling complaints against him over the past decade. The Greens created and maintained a secret dossier detailing allegations and strategies to manage media coverage and monitor social media discussions, including instructing staff to take screenshots of critical comments. MP Brad Pettitt and others urged for transparency and robust examination of these practices, emphasizing the importance of women feeling safe to bring forward complaints.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

West Australian Greens MPs have called for the publication of key findings from an investigation into Senator Jordon Steele-John, urging the party to expand the probe to examine its own processes. Seven Greens members wrote to federal leader David Shoebridge regarding "multiple allegations" about Steele-John's behavior in the presence of women between 2017 and 2025. The senator has taken leave following the release of a secret dossier that catalogued allegations against him for over a decade. Steele-John denies the claims, calling them non-specific. Shoebridge ordered an independent investigation but hasn't confirmed if its results will be made public. The WA Greens MPs consider these allegations serious and concerning, appreciating Shoebridge's swift response in initiating the inquiry.

Written for “Steele-John Probe Recommendations” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 86360 · logged 2026-10-17

Story

📰 Steele-John Probe Recommendations
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 50% hedged 1 of 2 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles describe different aspects of an ongoing situation, not a single specific incident occurring at the same time and place.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 32 📰 publisher trust 71
“The articles discuss related events but describe different aspects: Article A focuses on the WA Greens maintaining a crisis communications document, while Article B emphasizes MPs urging public release of findings and details about a secret dossier maintained for years.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 18 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss allegations against Jordon Steele-John and a secret dossier maintained by the Greens, Article A focuses on the denial of knowledge by David Shoebridge regarding the document's existence, whereas Article B calls for an investigation into the party's processes related to Steele-John.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 7 📰 publisher trust 71
“Article A reports on Steele-John taking leave amid allegations, while Article B discusses WA MPs urging the Greens to publicly release findings and expand their probe into Steele-John's case.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 24% hedged 5 of 21 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles describe related developments but different specific events: one about Steele-John taking leave from parliament, and another urging the party to release findings of an investigation.”
Daily Mail · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 1 of 10 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A reports on Senator Steele-John taking leave from the party room, while Article B focuses on calls for transparency in the investigation and details about a secret dossier maintained by the Greens.”
The Sydney Morning Herald · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 6 of 85 📰 publisher trust 61
“While both articles discuss a secret dossier created by the Greens about Senator Steele-John, they describe different aspects of the situation: Article A focuses on how the party managed complaints and shut down media coverage using the dossier, while Article B calls for the release of key findings from the investigation into Steele-John.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
19
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
2 of 19 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 3933 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Natassia Chrysanthos
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The MPs said they appreciated Shoebridge’s “swift and decisive response” in making sure the investigation started as soon as possible, as well as Steele-John’s willingness to address the allegations.
🔮 The Tasmanian senator said no one could deny the difficult position facing the Liberals, who have sunk in the polls after losing dozens of seats across two successive elections, but that he believed they would form government again. “This challenge is not insurmountable.
🔮 Treasurer Jim Chalmers has since negotiated a delay in the ban, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Tuesday said the government will consult the business community over the issue.
🔮 We’ve collected a bunch of questions that people have left on our pages, and I was hoping you could talk us through them.
🔮 On the first day of this year, at New York’s City Hall, socialist senator Bernie Sanders declared it was time for wealthy corporations to pay their fair share of tax as left-wing mayor Zohran Mamdani was sworn in.
🔮 Many Australians would best know his face from viral clips of his back-and-forth with ministers and senior bureaucrats during upper house hearings.
🔮 Labor is telling regional businesses to boost their workforces with Pacific migrants as it fights complaints from One Nation and industries who warn their operations will be crippled under government plans to cut thousands of working holidaymakers.
Also by Natassia Chrysanthos
‘Are migrants just a scapegoat?’ Your questions answered
2026-10-08 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Natassia Chrysanthos →

Topics

Greens Steele-John Steele-John’s WA Greens West Australian

Subjects

Greens ORG · 8× Steele-John PERSON · 7× Shoebridge PERSON · 3× WA Greens ORG · 3× Steele-John’s ORG · 2× Brad Pettitt PERSON · 1× David Shoebridge PERSON · 1× Jordon Steele-John PERSON · 1× Sophie McNeill PERSON · 1× West Australian NORP · 1×

Narrative

The party’s four state MPs in WA parliament – Brad Pettitt, Sophie McNeill, Jess Beckerling and Tim Clifford – issued a statement on Friday night saying they considered “any allegations of this nature to be serious and concerning, especially when they involve elected representatives”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-17
🔮 The MPs said they appreciated Shoebridge’s “swift and decisive response” in making sure the investigation started as soon as possible, as well as Steele-John’s willingness to address the allegations.
2026-10-17 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Steele-John probe should examine Greens processes, publish key findings: WA MPs · assertive framing

Claims (19 extracted, 2 hedged)

The West Australian Greens’ MPs have urged the party to publicly release the key findings from its investigation into Senator Jordon Steele-John and expand the probe to include the Greens’ own processes for dealing with the issue. asserted
MPs → urge → issue
This masthead revealed on Friday that the Greens created and maintained a secret dossier for 10 years that catalogued allegations against Steele-John and set out ways to shut down media coverage and monitor members who raised concerns on social media. asserted
who → reveal → media
The WA senator took leave this week after seven Greens members wrote to federal leader David Shoebridge regarding “multiple allegations” about “his behaviour in the presence of women” between 2017 and 2025. asserted
members → take → 2017
Steele-John strongly denies claims against him, describing them as non-specific. uncertain
John → deny → them
Shoebridge has ordered an independent investigation into allegations Steele-John made multiple inappropriate comments to women, this masthead revealed on Thursday, but the leader has refused to say whether the results of the inquiry should be made public. asserted
results → order → inquiry
The party’s four state MPs in WA parliament – Brad Pettitt, Sophie McNeill, Jess Beckerling and Tim Clifford – issued a statement on Friday night saying they considered “any allegations of this nature to be serious and concerning, especially when they involve elected representatives”. asserted
they → issue → representatives
“Women deserve to feel safe always, and must be able to bring forward complaints safely, and be heard and taken seriously when they do,” the statement said. asserted
statement → deserve → complaints
“We agree that this matter needs to be resolved via a fair, timely and independent investigation and that all parties are entitled to natural justice and procedural fairness.” asserted
parties → agree → justice
The MPs said they appreciated Shoebridge’s “swift and decisive response” in making sure the investigation started as soon as possible, as well as Steele-John’s willingness to address the allegations. asserted
started → say → allegations
“The WA Greens MPs expect this process to be robust and transparent and we support the key findings of the investigation being made public,” they said. “ asserted
they → expect → investigation
The WA Greens MPs support the investigation including an examination of the processes, including within the WA Greens, that have been followed in relation to this matter so far. asserted
that → support → matter
The party has been managing complaints about Steele-John for about a decade, according to a crisis communications strategy obtained by this masthead. uncertain
party → manage → masthead
The 47-page dossier, stored on a Google Drive folder accessible to WA Greens and national Greens staff, was first drafted in 2016 and has been updated in the years since. asserted
dossier → store → years
The document sets out ways to shut down media coverage of allegations about Steele-John, while also instructing taxpayer-funded Greens staff to monitor social media discussions and take screenshots of comments posted by party members. asserted
document → set → members
Then state convenor Sophie Greer, who is now Steele-John’s chief of staff, was required to “reach out” to Greens members if they had posted something negative about the senator. asserted
they → require → senator
Steele-John was to undergo training with Will Kelly, a senior media adviser to successive Greens leaders. asserted
John → undergo → leaders
Both were instructed to ensure then-leader Richard Di Natale was provided with information. asserted
Natale → instruct → information
Shoebridge has insisted he was not aware of any allegations against Steele-John before the letter was sent to him this week. asserted
letter → insist → him
The letter asserts that the senator’s alleged behaviour towards women was well-known within the party. asserted
behaviour → assert → party
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support