Last month, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries came under significant fire after The New York Times reported that he met with President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.
asserted
he → come → law
It particularly irritated some Democrats because Democrats hope to investigate Kushner and the rest of the Trump family, particularly looking into any ways they benefited financially from their closeness to the president.
asserted
they → irritate → president
Jeffries had to respond by saying, “Nobody is going to get a pass.”
asserted
Nobody → have → pass
But the meeting illustrated an uncomfortable truth: If Democrats do win back the House of Representatives, let alone the Senate, they will go from being the opposition that regularly criticizes Trump to having to govern with him.
asserted
that → illustrate → him
Historically, the president’s party loses control of at least one chamber of Congress during the midterm elections.
asserted
party → lose → elections
But while that would allow Democrats to block some of Trump’s major policy initiatives, it would also mean they would need to actually govern with him, find ways to keep the government funded and respond to crises.
asserted
government → allow → crises
But even moderate Democrats aren’t exactly sure where they can work with Trump.
asserted
they → work → Trump
“I would hope he'd be be willing to work with us on anything that's going to make life easier for the American people, namely trying to bring down the cost of living, trying to put our economy on stronger footing and national security in a better place,” Rep. Brad Schneider of Illinois told The Independent.
asserted
Schneider → hope → Independent
When asked what that would entail, he cited tariffs, but that would be more along the line of reining in Trump on his authority — not working with the president.
asserted
that → ask → president
And thats the issue — some Democrats would benefit from occasionally working with Trump, but tat isn’t what they are preaching.
asserted
they → s → what
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington represents a district that voted for Trump and is a co-chairwoman of the Blue Dog Caucus, a coterie of fiscally conservative Democrats.
asserted
that → represent → Democrats
But she did not offer a clear answer about where she would work with Trump.
asserted
she → offer → Trump
“I hope that folks around the president recognize the need to bring back American confidence in his leadership, and figure out where are these spots where we can be useful to people and get out of the spiral of like the D.C. Beltway games
asserted
we → hope → games
,” she told The Independent.
asserted
she → tell → Independent
Democrats might be perplexed about how to work with Trump because much of the time they had a majority during Trump’s first term, between 2019 and 2021, they opposed him.
uncertain
they → perplex → him
They were sworn in after winning the 2018 midterms when Trump shut down the government because he wanted to include money for his proposed border wall with Mexico.
asserted
he → swear → Mexico
And, of course, House Democrats would also impeach him in 2019 before the Senate voted to acquit after all but one Republican sided with the president.
asserted
Republican → impeach → president
Democrats would cap off Trump’s second term with a vote to impeach him again in 2021 after the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
asserted
Democrats → cap → Capitol
Rep.e Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York suggested that Democrats could get Trump to roll back cuts to Medicaid in his One Big, Beautiful Bill since many Trump supporters use Medicaid.
uncertain
supporters → suggest → Medicaid
“I know that many people who consider who consider themselves MAGA rely on Medicaid, and they don't deserve to suffer because of the horrifying cuts, trillion-dollar-in cuts in healthcare,” she told The Independent.
asserted
she → know → Independent
“And so I know that the House is more than willing, should we take the majority, to pass a reconciliation.”
asserted
we → know → reconciliation
But aside from that, essential functions would still need to be performed.
asserted
functions → need → that
Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut would become chairman of the House Intelligence Committee if Democrats won.
asserted
Democrats → become → Committee
He specifically cited how Congress needed to reauthorize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which expired this year due to opposition by many Democrats and a handful of Republicans.
asserted
which → cite → Republicans
He also said he appreciated Jay Clayton, Trump’s new director of National Intelligence, compared to Tulsi Gabbard.
asserted
he → say → Gabbard
“In contrast to his two predecessors, I think we can make real progress on some things associated with keeping Americans safe,” he said.
asserted
he → think → Americans
Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York, who represents a district Trump won, had one area.
asserted
Trump → represent → area
“Immigration, that’s my No. 1 thing,” he told The Independent.
asserted
he → ’ → Independent
Some have hoped that under a Democratic House, Trump could finally cut an agreement to fortify security at the U.S.-Mexico border while also providing relief to undocumented immigrants who have committed no crimes.
uncertain
who → hop → crimes
But that seems unlikely in a White House filled with immigration hardliners like Stephen Miller.
asserted
that → seem → Miller
Rep. Lori Trahan of Massachusetts has been working on legislation on AI with Republicans.
asserted
Trahan → work → Republicans
“I think it's we're running out of time with every model that escapes its testing environment, we run the risk of catastrophe,” she told The Independent.
asserted
she → think → Independent
“So I'm hoping that's an area where not just Democrats and Republicans can work together, but the president can sign a bill.”
asserted
president → hop → bill
But Rep. Greg Landsman, who represents a Trump district in Ohio, is not as optimistic as others.
asserted
who → represent → others
“They won't talk to us,” he said.
asserted
he → talk → us
“They won't negotiate with us.
asserted
They → negotiate → us
I mean, part of the reason it's been so chaotic and unproductive is they have no interest in working with us, I doubt that's going to change.”
asserted
that → mean → us
