Are you stupid, an idiot – or both? Philosophy has an answer

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Johnson, K. (2026, October 16). Are you stupid, an idiot – or both? Philosophy has an answer. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/culture/books/are-you-stupid-an-idiot-or-both-philosophy-has-an-answer-20261016-p60xly.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-10-16 · by Kurt Johnson

Quick Summary

Norwegian philosopher Lars Svendsen explores the concepts of stupidity and idiocy in his book "Stupid Idiots," recently translated into English. Svendsen distinguishes between the stupid, who choose not to think, and the idiots, who think poorly but may have opinions. The article discusses how social media and AI exacerbate these issues by amplifying misinformation. Svendsen draws on philosophers like Kant and Socrates to define stupidity as a lack of judgment or reflection on life. He also references Harry Frankfurt’s concept of bullshit, distinguishing it from lying. Through this exploration, Svendsen argues for rigorous thinking, humility, and exposure to opposing viewpoints to avoid idiocy.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Norwegian philosopher Lars Svendsen has recently published "Stupid Idiots: A Philosophy of Stupidity and Complete and Utter Downright Idiocy", exploring how people can be both stupid and idiotic in a modern context influenced by social media and AI. According to Svendsen, the term "stupid" refers to those who choose not to think critically, while "idiot" describes individuals who misthink or reason poorly. This book arrives at a time when such behaviors seem particularly rampant due to technological amplification and widespread misinformation on platforms like social media.

Svendsen's work builds upon historical philosophical insights, citing Immanuel Kant's view of stupidity as the absence of judgment and Socrates' assertion that stupid individuals fail to critically examine their lives. The philosopher aims to provide a nuanced understanding of why these behaviors persist and how they manifest in contemporary society.

The publication of this book highlights growing concerns about public discourse and decision-making processes influenced by widespread access to information through technology, which can sometimes lead to misinformation or poor judgment.

Written for “Philosophy Questions Intelligence” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 84107 · logged 2026-10-16

Story

📰 Philosophy Questions Intelligence
Other · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
3 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Other
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 3860 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kurt Johnson
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The separation between norms and idiots may not have been as impermeable as my father supposed.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Marxist Nazi Norwegian Sydney

Subjects

Svendsen PERSON · 4× Schopenhauer PERSON · 2× Harry Frankfurt’s PERSON · 1× Hayek PERSON · 1× Kant PERSON · 1× Lars Svendsen PERSON · 1× Marxist NORP · 1× Norwegian NORP · 1× Socrates PERSON · 1× Sydney GPE · 1×

Narrative

It is also an exercise in humility as those who consider themselves best informed are most likely to err – like when Schopenhauer explains that one can “read themselves stupid” by consuming only literature that accords with their opinions.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-16
🔮 The separation between norms and idiots may not have been as impermeable as my father supposed.
2026-10-16 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Are you stupid, an idiot – or both? Philosophy has an answer · assertive framing

Claims (40 extracted, 3 hedged)

“Idiots are out in force again today,” uttered my father sotto voce whenever someone cut him off or flagrantly disobeyed the road rules. asserted
someone → utter → rules
From the back seat, I, a young lad naive to Sydney’s road rage, interpreted this to mean the “idiots” had got themselves organised. asserted
themselves → interpret → rage
They were deploying en masse to the great inconvenience, even danger, of us ordinary citizens. asserted
They → deploy → citizens
The separation between norms and idiots may not have been as impermeable as my father supposed. uncertain
father → suppose → norms
Norwegian philosopher Lars Svendsen explains in the recently translated Stupid Idiots: A Philosophy of Stupidity and Complete and Utter Downright Idiocy that at times we’re all stupid and idiotic. asserted
we → explain → times
Svendsen’s examination has been timed to a moment when both have taken the world by storm. asserted
both → time → storm
First, a distinction: the stupid are those who choose not to think, while the idiots among us think poorly. asserted
idiots → choose → us
From this point, the author develops a taxonomy via a survey of philosophers and writers. asserted
author → develop → philosophers
Kant, who features heavily, considered stupidity a lack of judgment, while Socrates labelled the stupid as those who failed to examine life. asserted
who → feature → life
We, of course, could not leave without mention of Harry Frankfurt’s seminal On Bullshit, who defined bullshit as a disregard for the truth (as opposed to lying, which acknowledges truth and says the opposite). uncertain
which → leave → opposite
This introduces us to an overlapping concept: stupid idiocy. asserted
This → introduce → concept
Through its short but incisive exploration of failures to think well, Stupid Idiots paradoxically becomes a guide to rigorous thinking. asserted
Idiots → think → thinking
For it is at the border between wisdom and idiocy that greatest insights lie. asserted
insights → lie → wisdom
It is also an exercise in humility as those who consider themselves best informed are most likely to err – like when Schopenhauer explains that one can “read themselves stupid” by consuming only literature that accords with their opinions. asserted
that → consider → opinions
Svendsen recommends the budding Marxist pick up Hayek and vice versa. asserted
Marxist → recommend → Hayek
Through echo-chamber busting, Svendsen suggests a return to the fundamentals of discourse and a subtle rejection of our fractured, dug-in politics. uncertain
Svendsen → suggest → politics
Instead, if we cultivate critical thinking, are suspicious of orthodoxy and listen to those holding opposing views, we have a real shot at avoiding idiocy, if not attaining wisdom. asserted
we → cultivate → wisdom
On the other hand, Stupid Idiots articulates how the chips are stacked to the advantage of the habitually moronic. asserted
chips → articulate → moronic
The Dunning-Kruger effect, for example, boils down to the less you know about a subject the smarter you think you are. asserted
you → boil → subject
You simply don’t know how much you don’t know. asserted
you → know → much
Meanwhile, bad information (bullshit) travels further and faster than the truth. asserted
information → travel → truth
Svendsen’s work exudes tolerance and empathy on the subject of human fallibility. asserted
work → exude → fallibility
Great thinkers have all been idiots at times: Heidegger was a Nazi, Aristotle thought women had fewer teeth than men, and Schopenhauer believed in all sorts of paranormal nonsense. asserted
Schopenhauer → think → nonsense
Indeed, our discourse, the basis of our political system, can and must withstand certain amounts of stupidity and idiocy. asserted
discourse → withstand → stupidity
The author states that conservatives tend to be stupid, as they too readily accept authority, while progressives are more likely to be idiots as they overestimate their outside-the-box thinking. asserted
they → state → thinking
Things only go awry when we reach a critical mass of stupid idiots. asserted
we → go → idiots
They are those who think badly and are so pigheaded they refuse to be swayed by life, experience or contradictory data. asserted
they → think → life
All dictators are stupid idiots as they cannot stomach dissenting opinion. asserted
they → stomach → opinion
And so, in rounding its final corner, Stupid Idiots reaches the subject it had been alluding to all along: Donald Trump. asserted
it → round → subject
So rare IRL does one meet a near-perfect archetype. asserted
one → meet → archetype
Trump, who is convinced “nobody knows more about this than me”, routinely demonstrates stupid idiocy par excellence. asserted
nobody → convince → idiocy
What is special about this book is that up to now it appears more beard stroking philosophy until the revelation it has been a political script the entire time. asserted
it → appear → revelation
Through acknowledging this, Stupid Idiots is short, sharp, rigorous and avoids condescension. asserted
Idiots → acknowledge → condescension
It is a guide to how we can all think better and an admission that fallible thinking is universal. asserted
thinking → think → ?
Or in other words, to “duh” is human. asserted
duh → duh → words
Stupid Idiots: A Philosophy of Stupidity and Complete and Utter Downright Idiocy by Lars Svendsen, translated by Matt Bagguley, is published by Reaktion Books ($35). asserted
Idiots → translate → Books
What else is happening in the book world? asserted
What → happen → world
- Pulitzer prizewinner Barbara Kingsolver on her new novel and Appalachian pride - He lasted 11 days in Trump’s White House. asserted
He → last → House
Now the Mooch has a warning asserted
Mooch → have → warning
- This novel is the raw, moving reality check Australian fiction needs asserted
fiction → need → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support