Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Dr. Angus McClellan has just posted 151 pages of "Additional Research on Comprehensive Security and Sensitive Places" showing that at the Founding armed security was tied to each of Bruen's three sensitive places where arms could be restricted.
uncertain
arms → post → places
Historical tradition from the American colonies and early states demonstrates that the predicate for banning weapons by the public at courts, legislative assemblies, and polling places was the government's provision of real protection in fact.
asserted
predicate → demonstrate → fact
That research supplements Dr. McClellan's compendium "The Second Amendment, Sensitive Places, and Comprehensive Government Security" which I summarized here.
asserted
I → supplement → which
In Wolford, the Supreme Court found Hawaii's law banning firearms on private property open to the public without affirmative consent of the owner – aka, the "Vampire Rule" – to violate the Second Amendment.
asserted
law → find → Amendment
The Court took notice of, but did not resolve, the issue that, "On a large portion of the land within the State's boundaries, possession of a firearm is now flatly prohibited."
asserted
possession → take → firearm
That issue has been pending in the several states that sought to nullify Bruen's holding that firearm carry permits may not be restricted to a privileged few or denied for purported lack of "need."
uncertain
permits → pende → need
One of those states is New Jersey, and early this year the Third Circuit en banc held oral argument about that ban in Koons v. Attorney General.
asserted
Circuit → hold → General
The premise of these bans is that any place is "sensitive" if the legislature so declares.
asserted
legislature → declare → bans
While it is often argued that being crowded suffices, that is belied by the fact that the bans include vast acreage of wooded parklands inhabited primarily by deer and squirrels.
asserted
bans → argue → deer
But Bruen explicitly rejected an arms prohibition based on being crowded, explicitly mentioning Manhattan as an example.
asserted
Bruen → reject → example
Bruen did not go into the factual historical tradition justifying gun bans in the three locations it mentioned, as the issue was not before the Court.
asserted
issue → go → Court
And that's where the research by Dr. McClellan fills the gap.
asserted
research → fill → gap
As prefaced in his "Additional Research," McClellan states: "The primary purpose of this additional research is to determine whether all 13 original colonies or early states had armed, government security personnel assigned to doorways at the sensitive places of courthouses/courtrooms, legislative buildings/chambers, and polling places."
asserted
colonies → preface → courtrooms
A secondary purpose, he continues, is to confirm that courthouses, legislatures, and polling places were indeed "sensitive," i.e., governments could or did ban weapons there.
uncertain
governments → continue → weapons
As for the method of research: "There are four sought-after elements in the historical material for determining whether a place had comprehensive security: a government agent was assigned to the place; his duties included maintaining security; he guarded a doorway; he carried a weapon."
asserted
he → be → weapon
Finally, a "sensitive place" was "one where arms were prohibited."
asserted
arms → prohibit → ?
The research compiles sources showing where bans were enacted with evidence that such places were secured.
asserted
places → compile → evidence
McClellan's research is truly overwhelming and is supported by hundreds of footnotes.
asserted
research → support → footnotes
Weapons were not necessarily always banned in the subject places, but they could be; the ultimate point is that these places were secured by government agents.
uncertain
places → ban → agents
I will mention only one entry illustrative of each of the identified sensitive places.
asserted
I → mention → places
At the trial of Aaron Burr, General James Wilkinson was disarmed in the court by the U.S. marshal to prevent him from intimidating the jury, indicating at least that (1) weapons were or could be banned in court, (2) government officers were present in court to disarm people.
uncertain
officers → disarm → people
Wilkinson was a senior U.S. Army officer who had conspired with Burr to raise an army to seize Spanish territory.
asserted
who → conspire → territory
He turned against Burr and served then as the prosecutor's chief witness.
asserted
He → turn → witness
At the grand jury proceeding, the jury foreman was John Randolph of Roanoke, who upon seeing Wilkinson with a sword, alerted the marshal (1807).
asserted
who → see → marshal
Armed sentinels guarded the doorway to the hall, both inside and out.
asserted
sentinels → guard → hall
Note also that "it was standard procedure for legislative bodies to meet in secret" (1787).
asserted
bodies → note → secret
Sheriffs shall be judges of elections, and he and other officers shall be required to preserve good order and keep the peace.
asserted
he → require → peace
Inspectors shall, when taking the [voice] votes or tickets, call out loud the name of the elector, and shall then place the tickets into a ballot box (1772).
asserted
Inspectors → take → box
The pattern was consistent: where the government required citizens to disarm, it supplied the protection itself.
asserted
it → require → protection
At other times, the government required citizens to arm themselves, such as in colonial times when going to church.
asserted
government → require → church
"Sensitive places" was never meant to be a blank check.
asserted
places → mean → ?
At the Third Circuit's en banc argument in Koons, Judge Paul Matey asked New Jersey counsel whether courts should "really be overreading Heller's colorful use of the phrase 'sensitive places' as actually creating a doctrine," likening it to "large capacity magazines or assault weapons" — "a regulatory term that could be applied to anything that a regulator wants to regulate and then used as a claim for historical justification."
uncertain
regulator → ask → justification
The one principle that does come from history is government-provided security.
asserted
that → come → history
As Judge Matey put it: "at least one example of what it means could be places where government provided comprehensive security, right.
uncertain
government → put → security
And so we would know that that courthouse, a military base, these are places where … going armed was severely restricted.
asserted
going → know → ?
I mean, isn't that a helpful way of thinking about this?"
asserted
that → mean → this
The record says otherwise.
asserted
record → say → ?
The Fourth Circuit in Kipke v. Moore upheld Maryland's gun bans on transit, parks, hospitals, museums, stadiums, and casinos on "crowded" and "vulnerable" theories — the very rationales Bruen rejected for Manhattan.
asserted
Bruen → uphold → Manhattan
Judge Agee, dissenting, called the sensitive-places exception "narrow" and warned that the majority had turned it into a license.
asserted
majority → dissent → license
Comprehensive security makes sense.
asserted
security → make → sense
…and 2 more, not listed.
The Aporia