One thing is certain: if left unchecked the creep of radical Islam could destroy us

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Syed, M. (2026, October 16). One thing is certain: if left unchecked the creep of radical Islam could destroy us. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/15/opinion/one-thing-is-certain-if-left-unchecked-the-creep-of-radical-islam-could-destroy-us/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-16 · by Matthew Syed

Quick Summary

This opinion piece by a writer critical of Democratic politicians argues that appeasing radical Islam poses a significant threat to society. The author cites examples like the 2023 Hamas attack and recent synagogue bombing as evidence of this danger, while noting some Democrats' tendency to blame Israel or systemic issues rather than confronting the radicals directly. The article emphasizes the need for political leaders to address what the writer views as the increasing extremism without equivocation.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 16, 2026, Matthew Syed in the New York Post expressed concern about the unchecked spread of radical Islam, criticizing Democratic politicians for what he sees as appeasement and avoidance of addressing the threat. Syed references historical contexts and contemporary events like the 9/11 attacks and the Israeli attack on Gaza in October 2023, where Hamas killed hundreds of Israelis, to argue that liberals still fail to confront radical Islam directly. He emphasizes the danger posed by figures who use religion to justify violence, citing examples such as the 7/7 London bombings and other terrorist acts. Syed asserts that there is a need for a shift in how society addresses these issues, drawing parallels with historical periods of scientific revolution where questioning dogma was crucial.

Written for “Radical Islam Concerns” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 83817 (high confidence, 6 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-16

Story

📰 Radical Islam Concerns
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
3 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 10708 article(s) · 30 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 30 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Matthew Syed
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 You will remember in the aftermath of 9/11 how many “progressives” insisted that these iniquities were caused by American foreign policy, or western colonialism, or the one Jewish state.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

American Democratic Islam London Michigan

Subjects

American NORP · 3× Michigan GPE · 3× Hamas ORG · 2× Jewish NORP · 2× London GPE · 2× Charlie Hebdo ORG · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Islam ORG · 1× Israelis NORP · 1× Mumbai GPE · 1×

Narrative

It sat behind the scientific revolution, figures like Newton and Boyle questioning the prevailing dogma, performing experiments, testing hypotheses, a thrilling culture of discovery that contrasts vividly with the Islamic caliphates of the age where “innovator” was a term not of praise but — as the scholar Toby Huff has put it — a “heretic, subject to death.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-16
🔮 You will remember in the aftermath of 9/11 how many “progressives” insisted that these iniquities were caused by American foreign policy, or western colonialism, or the one Jewish state.

Claims (40 extracted, 3 hedged)

I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. asserted
I → like → doubt
But what is the appropriate response as we watch Democratic politicians appeasing, excusing and deflecting in the face of one of the greatest threats of our age: radical Islam? asserted
politicians → watch → age
You will remember in the aftermath of 9/11 how many “progressives” insisted that these iniquities were caused by American foreign policy, or western colonialism, or the one Jewish state. asserted
iniquities → remember → policy
Anything, in fact, to avoid taking these men at their word, who made videos explicitly stating that they were murdering to “bring glory to Allah.” asserted
they → avoid → Allah
And yet what is amazing 25 years later — despite the Mumbai atrocities, the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the 7/7 London bombings, and what security analysts tell us would have been dozens, perhaps hundreds more attacks on American soil had it not been for the diligence of the security services — is that many liberals are still singing the same grotesque song. asserted
liberals → tell → song
You have seen it. asserted
You → see → it
I have seen it. asserted
I → see → it
In the hours following the murder, rape and mutilation of hundreds of Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023 — many of them young people doing nothing more than dancing as the sun rose — Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib managed to say: “suffocating, dehumanizing conditions . . . can lead to resistance.” asserted
conditions → follow → resistance
In other words, the responsibility for the October 7 massacre lies not with Hamas but Israel. asserted
responsibility → lie → Hamas
Zohran Mamdani — now mayor of a city with almost a million Jews — engaged in the same moral subterfuge. asserted
Mamdani → engage → subterfuge
“The path toward a just and lasting peace can only begin by ending the occupation and dismantling apartheid,” he said. asserted
he → begin → apartheid
This isn’t just a pattern; it’s a pathology. asserted
it → ’ → ?
I could give you dozens of further examples, but let me offer just one. uncertain
me → give → one
In March this year, after a man drove an explosives-laden vehicle into a synagogue in Michigan, hoping to massacre 140 people, mostly children, Abdul El-Sayed reached for perhaps the most sinister phrase in the modern political idiom: “Hurt people hurt people.” asserted
people → drive → people
This is the Senate candidate for Michigan, ladies and gentlemen, the favorite to take his place within the font of political power. asserted
This → take → power
Does he not realize (or does he realize only too well) that the fanatics are laughing at him, using him, wielding his eloquence for their own advantage, a form of geopolitical jujitsu that should make us weep? Beware extremism I have seen Islamic fundamentalism up close. asserted
I → realize → fundamentalism
My late, beloved father grew up as a Shia in Pakistan, and many in his extended family remain of that faith. asserted
many → grow → faith
Most, I am glad to say, are moderates who live and let live. asserted
who → say → ?
But a small number are implacable fanatics, believing that my father’s conversion to Christianity — after he came to London to study law in the 1960s and met my mum in church soon afterwards — was an act of apostasy deserving of death. asserted
he → believe → death
You won’t be surprised to hear that we keep our distance from these cousins. asserted
we → hear → cousins
So let me say to credulous Democrats: These radicals are not amenable to negotiation. asserted
radicals → let → negotiation
They are not seeking compromise. asserted
They → seek → compromise
They are not animated by poverty or alleged “suffocation.” asserted
They → animate → poverty
You could have handed ISIS the entire GDP of America and carved out a space in the wider Levant larger than 10 Alaskas, and they would not have said “thank you” but used every advantage — financial or otherwise — to do what they have said is their animating purpose: to escalate bloody jihad. uncertain
said → hand → jihad
Similarly, whatever you think of the Netanyahu government or its prosecution of the war in Gaza, do you really think that if they handed Hamas a few billion dollars over and above what they have already squandered on terror tunnels and weapons, they would have been sated? asserted
they → think → tunnels
Or would they have moved to do what is written in their founding charter: to wipe the Little Satan from the pages of history before turning on the Big Satan? asserted
what → move → Satan
A virus that is spreading. asserted
that → spread → ?
A virus that means synagogues and Jewish schools must be protected by armed guards. asserted
synagogues → mean → guards
A virus that will greedily exploit any vector, Democratic politicians most of all, to replicate. asserted
that → exploit → all
A virus whose adherents lack that most civilizing of human virtues: doubt. asserted
adherents → lack → virtues
And doubt, let me emphasize, is no small thing. asserted
me → let → ?
I believe it lies at the heart of what has made our civilization great. asserted
civilization → believe → heart
It sat behind the scientific revolution, figures like Newton and Boyle questioning the prevailing dogma, performing experiments, testing hypotheses, a thrilling culture of discovery that contrasts vividly with the Islamic caliphates of the age where “innovator” was a term not of praise but — as the scholar Toby Huff has put it — a “heretic, subject to death.” asserted
scholar → sit → death
It is central to our political culture, too, the notion that no one has a monopoly on what constitutes a worthy life and thus we should live in peaceful coexistence with one another. asserted
we → constitute → one
The philosopher John Stuart Mill talked of “experiments in living,” a phrase that I have always felt rather wonderfully describes the tapestry of this great continent, the genius of millions of disparate people living under a common law. asserted
I → talk → law
And it is why I shudder when beholding those who cut the throats of their hostages, who video themselves as they rape and mutilate their victims, whose eyes brook no doubt in their psychopathic self-certainty. asserted
eyes → shudder → certainty
And I look, no less fearfully, at the smooth, articulate, handsome men and women whose families have benefited so mightily from the society that has adopted them, while giving succor to those who wish to destroy it. asserted
who → look → it
Can we continue to put this down to naivety? asserted
we → continue → naivety
Or is it time to give it a more apposite name: complicity? asserted
it → give → name
One thing is certain: Left unchecked, this threat could destroy us. uncertain
threat → leave → us
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support