The Supreme Court of Canada plans to hear arguments Thursday from a coalition challenging the constitutionality of legislation that smooths the way for major changes at Ontario Place.
asserted
that → plan → Place
The case unfolding in Canada’s top court could reverberate far beyond the Toronto waterfront park that opened in 1971.
uncertain
that → unfold → 1971
Over the years, the theme park featured a spherical theatre that showed movies on a huge screen, children’s play areas, a revolving concert stage and several pavilions suspended above the water.
asserted
that → feature → water
The provincial government wants to redevelop Ontario Place to include an elaborate spa operated by a private company, a relocated Ontario Science Centre, revamped play and shoreline areas, a parking facility and a provincial police detachment.
asserted
government → want → company
The coalition Ontario Place Protectors challenged the province’s Rebuilding Ontario Place Act on the basis that it insulates state action from scrutiny by the courts and therefore violates the Constitution.
asserted
it → challenge → Constitution
The coalition also argued that exemptions from environmental and heritage laws and municipal noise regulations amount to a breach of public trust.
asserted
exemptions → argue → trust
An Ontario judge dismissed the application in 2024 and a challenge of the ruling in the provincial Court of Appeal was also unsuccessful.
asserted
challenge → dismiss → Appeal
Writing on behalf of a unanimous Court of Appeal, Justice Grant Huscroft said there was no doubt that the provincial government’s decision to redevelop Ontario Place is strongly opposed by a number of concerned citizens and organizations.
asserted
decision → write → citizens
Political opposition to the plan has not swayed the government and the coalition has turned to the court in an effort to stop it, Huscroft said.
asserted
Huscroft → sway → it
Get daily National news
“But there is no basis for the court to do so.
asserted
court → get → news
The court is not an alternative forum for resolving political grievances.
asserted
court → resolve → grievances
The only legitimate question for the court is whether the impugned provisions of ROPA violate the law or the Constitution,” he wrote.
asserted
he → violate → law
“They do not, and the appeal must be dismissed.
asserted
appeal → do → ?
In January, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the Ontario Place Protectors’ case.
asserted
Court → agree → case
The coalition says provincial superior courts have historical and inherent jurisdiction to review laws and government actions protected under section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867, and to provide effective remedies when governments do not respect the limits on their powers.
asserted
governments → say → powers
The coalition says the Rebuilding Ontario Place Act’s scope is unprecedented and appears to violate section 96 by removing the essential core powers of the courts.
asserted
scope → say → courts
It argues the legislation severely limits or entirely eliminates the ability of courts to hold Crown officials accountable through declaratory actions, damage awards and injunctions when they have acted beyond their powers.
asserted
they → argue → powers
The coalition is also seeking to have the doctrine of public trust acknowledged as an unwritten constitutional principle rooted in English common law and inherited by Canada.
asserted
doctrine → seek → Canada
It argues the doctrine of public trust maintains that natural and cultural assets are essential to public welfare and must be safeguarded by the state in its role as trustee.
asserted
assets → argue → trustee
- Strong advance voting turnout in Kelowna as municipal election approaches
- Regina City Council debates concerns and involvement in Bell’s AI Data Centre expansion
- Vancouver Aquatic Centre 25-metre rebuild a First Nation’s land claim issue: Park Board chair
- BC NDP election costings would see deficit fall to $12B in two years
Margie Zeidler, the daughter of Ontario Place architect Eberhard Zeidler, remembers visiting the park as a child.
uncertain
Zeidler → approach → child
It was a public place,” she said in an interview.
asserted
she → say → interview
“You could have a picnic in the forest.
uncertain
You → have → forest
You could watch films at Cinesphere.
uncertain
You → watch → Cinesphere
You could watch any musical performance at the forum.”
uncertain
You → watch → forum
Zeidler, a member of the Ontario Place Protectors coalition, says the provincial government’s actions have made the fight about more than just the historic theme park.
asserted
fight → say → park
“It became more, not about Ontario Place, but about, wait a minute, what democracy are we living in here?” she said.
asserted
she → become → democracy
“I didn’t know governments could do that.”
uncertain
governments → know → that
In their written submission to the Supreme Court, the Crown and the Ontario attorney general say the case should be dismissed.
asserted
case → write → Court
The immunity provided by the provincial legislation does not go as far as the coalition alleges, the submission says: “(The act) does not make Ontario Place a lawless zone.”
asserted
Place → provide → legislation
Rather, it immunizes the Crown, its servants and agents from civil causes of action arising from specific circumstances, the submission says.
asserted
submission → immunize → circumstances
The Crown and attorney general also urge the court to reject the claim that the legislation is invalid because of the doctrine of public trust.
uncertain
legislation → urge → trust
“The novel doctrine articulated by the Appellant is not an unwritten constitutional principle, and even if such a doctrine existed in law, which is denied, there is no evidence in the record that could warrant applying this far-reaching new doctrine to Ontario Place,” the submission says.
uncertain
submission → articulate → Place
The case has attracted submissions from interveners, including several provinces, First Nations, civil liberties groups and environmental organizations.
asserted
case → attract → provinces
The Supreme Court often reserves its decisions until a later date, meaning a ruling in the case might not come until next year.
uncertain
ruling → reserve → year
The Aporia
