The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday that it will take up a case to decide whether a watchdog organization can obtain information to help establish whether the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is subject to a federal public records law.
asserted
Department → say → law
It’s the latest update on a lawsuit filed by a nonprofit called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) that argues DOGE, the initiative that was spearheaded by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
asserted
that → ’ → Act
The Trump Administration has argued that FOIA does not apply to DOGE because it was not a federal agency—it was a presidential advisory body.
asserted
it → argue → DOGE
Signed into law in 1966 by President Lyndon B. Johnson, FOIA grants “the public the right to request access to records from any federal agency,” according to the federal government’s website.
uncertain
FOIA → sign → website
Johnson said at the time that he hoped the government would, in upholding the law, weigh national security, individual privacy, confidential government deliberations, and the benefit of a well-informed constituency.
asserted
government → say → constituency
“The founding principle of FOIA is that it’s crucial in a democracy to have an informed citizenry,” says Sara Creighton, an associate professor at Georgetown Law and the former Deputy Chief Counsel at American Oversight, a government transparency nonprofit.
asserted
Creighton → ’ → Oversight
“The whole idea is that we need an informed voting public.”
asserted
we → need → public
Justices have agreed to hear arguments over whether, and to what extent, discovery can proceed for CREW v. DOGE Service.
asserted
discovery → agree → CREW
This phase of the legal process allows opposing parties to collect information, including records and depositions, with which to make their cases.
asserted
parties → allow → cases
Experts say this decision will not only affect the pending lawsuit, but may also have ramifications for the future of government transparency.
uncertain
decision → say → transparency
How did the DOGE records case reach the Supreme Court?
asserted
case → reach → Court
CREW filed an FOIA request seeking expedited processing for information about DOGE on Jan. 24, 2025, seeking insights about its structure and communications with other agencies.
asserted
CREW → file → agencies
When it didn’t receive the documents it requested, the organization sued.
asserted
organization → receive → documents
“The law is clear about how government records should be preserved so that, when the public requests them, they are easily and readily accessible.
asserted
they → preserve → them
If the administration valued transparency, following records laws would be a priority,” CREW President Noah Bookbinder said in a statement announcing the lawsuit on Feb. 20, 2025.
asserted
Bookbinder → value → Feb.
“Instead, US DOGE Service and OMB are acting as though the law does not apply to them.
asserted
law → act → them
It does.
asserted
It → do → ?
“The fight ultimately in the DOGE case, and what CREW was hoping to test with its litigation, was whether DOGE [is] subject to FOIA,” says Ryan Mulvey, a senior policy counsel at the Americans for Prosperity Foundation.
asserted
Mulvey → hop → Foundation
On April 15, 2025, Judge Christopher Cooper ruled on behalf of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that the case could proceed to discovery.
uncertain
case → rule → discovery
The Department of Justice, however, filed an emergency appeal in May 2025 asking the Supreme Court to intervene.
uncertain
Department → file → Court
The Supreme Court paused the discovery orders on May 23, 2025.
uncertain
Court → pause → May
On June 6, 2025, it directed the appeals court to narrow the requests, finding that those concerning DOGE’s recommendations and whether agencies followed them were “not appropriately tailored.”
asserted
agencies → direct → them
CREW then pared back its requests for discovery, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld them.
asserted
Court → par → them
The Trump Administration again filed a request to the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower court was not adhering to the previous ruling by granting “wide-ranging and intrusive discovery.”
asserted
court → file → discovery
In response, the Supreme Court agreed this week to take up the question of whether the case can proceed to discovery.
asserted
case → agree → discovery
It’s unclear at this point when oral arguments would begin, but a ruling is expected by the end of term in late June or early July 2027.
uncertain
ruling → ’ → June
What could the Supreme Court’s DOGE ruling mean for public access?
uncertain
ruling → mean → access
The Supreme Court’s ruling will determine if CREW can access the information that could help it make its case that DOGE acted as a federal authority that is subject to FOIA, according to Creighton.
uncertain
that → determine → Creighton
If not, the nonprofit may have difficulty pursuing its argument.
uncertain
nonprofit → have → argument
“Because so much about how DOGE operated … was not publicly explained, discovery is the only way to unearth key facts about DOGE’s operations and exercises of authority,” says Margaret Kwoka, the Frank R. Strong Chair in Law at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, who joined a brief supporting CREW as an outside legal expert.
asserted
who → operate → expert
“Those details will illuminate whether it is in fact exercising independent authority or whether it is acting as an advisor to the President.
asserted
it → illuminate → President
The outcome of the case could have implications beyond the current Administration, Creighton says.
uncertain
Creighton → have → Administration
“Whether an entity is subject to FOIA really determines how much information the public gets to know about it, and whether [entities] have any obligation to disclose their documents to the public,” Creighton says.
asserted
Creighton → determine → public
The current issue before the Supreme Court pertains to discovery, but Creighton warns that if the Supreme Court ultimately rules that DOGE is not subject to FOIA, that could potentially “open the door for future presidents to create entities inside the Executive Office of the President that do significant work—even potentially work relating to the work of agencies who are usually subject to FOIA—but allow that work to be outside the scope of FOIA.”
uncertain
work → pertain → FOIA
CREW did not respond to TIME’s request for comment, but it has previously said that government transparency is at stake.
asserted
transparency → respond → stake
“The lower courts have uniformly ruled that CREW is entitled to discovery in this case to help the court determine whether DOGE wields the type of authority that would make it subject to FOIA,” CREW’s chief counsel, Nikhel Sus, told POLITICO in a statement on Tuesday.
asserted
counsel → rule → Tuesday
“We will continue to pursue transparency for the American people, who deserve to know the details of the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally remake the federal government.”
asserted
who → continue → government
Solicitor General D. John Sauer, meanwhile, argued in his filing to the Supreme Court that the appeals court ruling “intrudes into the autonomy and confidentiality of presidential advisors and augurs time-consuming and burdensome discovery litigation.”
asserted
ruling → argue → litigation
He further claimed that the lower court decision “threatens to burden future presidential administrations” with similar legal cases.
asserted
decision → claim → cases
The White House referred TIME to the Department of Justice, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
asserted
which → refer → comment
…and 7 more, not listed.
The Aporia
.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)
