Frustrated by Losses in the Courts, Missouri Republicans Want to Change How Top Judges Are Selected

Read the original at ProPublica ↗
Cite

Kohler, J. (2026, October 15). Frustrated by Losses in the Courts, Missouri Republicans Want to Change How Top Judges Are Selected. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/missouri-plan-judge-selection-republican-attacks

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ProPublica · collected 2026-10-15 · by Jeremy Kohler

Quick Summary

Not summarized yet. This article was analyzed before summaries existed, or the model was unreachable at the time. python maintenance.py backfill-article-summaries fills these in.

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Missouri Republicans, frustrated by losses in court cases, are pushing to change how top judges are selected. Currently, Missouri uses a system known as the "Missouri Plan," established 86 years ago, where a commission of lawyers and non-lawyers recommends three candidates for the governor to choose from when appointing Supreme Court and appellate judges. This system was designed to reduce political influence in judicial appointments. In recent years, conservative activists like Leonard Leo have attempted to alter this process but were unsuccessful. Now, Republicans are considering giving the governor more control over selecting judges, similar to systems used in other states like Illinois and California.

Written for “Missouri Republican Judge Selection Changes” on 2026-10-15, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans right for article 81632 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-15

Story

📰 Missouri Republican Judge Selection Changes
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
63
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
4 of 63 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
96/100
ProPublica's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ProPublica · 91 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Jeremy Kohler
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some 86 years ago, Missouri voters enshrined a system for selecting top judges that would remove political influence from the courts.
🔮 Two years ago, abortion opponents in Missouri tried to defeat Amendment 3, a ballot initiative to enshrine reproductive rights in the state constitution, by falsely telling voters that it would allow gender transition surgeries for minors — even though it wouldn’t.
Also by Jeremy Kohler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

GOP Missouri Republican Republicans Supreme Court

Subjects

Missouri GPE · 6× Supreme Court ORG · 5× Hoskins PERSON · 4× Republican NORP · 4× Republicans NORP · 3× GOP ORG · 2× Blunt PERSON · 1× Leonard Leo PERSON · 1× Matt Blunt PERSON · 1× the state Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Rather than electing top judges, as Illinois does, or giving the governor primary responsibility for choosing them, like California, Missouri selects its appellate and Supreme Court judges through a commission made up of three lawyers, one elected by lawyers in each appellate district; three non-lawyers appointed by the governor, one from each district; and a state Supreme Court judge selected by the court.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-15
🔮 Some 86 years ago, Missouri voters enshrined a system for selecting top judges that would remove political influence from the courts.

Claims (63 extracted, 4 hedged)

Some 86 years ago, Missouri voters enshrined a system for selecting top judges that would remove political influence from the courts. asserted
that → enshrine → courts
And almost immediately, it came under attack. asserted
it → come → attack
Under what has come to be known as the Missouri Plan, lawyers help choose a slate of three candidates from which the governor must make an appointment for the state Supreme Court, appeals courts and, in some populous areas, the circuit courts. asserted
governor → come → areas
In the first years after adoption, it faced pushback from party bosses who had historically used judicial seats for political patronage. asserted
who → face → patronage
They said it gave too much power to the lawyers. asserted
it → say → lawyers
Voters, though, decisively defeated a repeal measure in 1942. asserted
Voters → defeat → 1942
More recently, the conservative activist Leonard Leo, who viewed Missouri as a crucial battleground, tried in 2007 to persuade Republican Gov. Matt Blunt to reject a slate of Supreme Court candidates — part of a broader effort to weaken a judicial selection system that had become a model for some two dozen states around the country. asserted
that → view → country
Blunt resisted and picked one of the three judges from the approved slate. asserted
Blunt → resist → slate
Then, in 2012, GOP lawmakers put a proposed overhaul before voters that, if approved, would have given the governor more control. asserted
that → put → control
Voters, by a 3-to-1 margin, turned back the plan. asserted
Voters → turn → plan
Now the attacks are back, driven by a new grievance. asserted
attacks → drive → grievance
At President Donald Trump’s behest, Republican lawmakers redrew the state’s congressional map in a mid-decade gerrymander. asserted
lawmakers → redrew → gerrymander
The goal: to give the GOP a shot at winning seven of Missouri’s congressional seats, instead of the six it now holds. asserted
it → give → seats
But voters gathered enough signatures to force a referendum on the map and put it on hold. asserted
voters → gather → hold
While Secretary of State Denny Hoskins tried to keep the referendum off the ballot, the Missouri Supreme Court overruled him. asserted
Court → try → him
It ordered the old map restored until voters decide on the new one. asserted
voters → order → one
Hoskins, citing a federal court ruling that contradicted the state’s highest court, directed officials to use the new map anyway, prompting Chief Justice Brent Powell to demand that Hoskins appear in court to show why he shouldn’t be held in contempt. asserted
he → cite → contempt
Fourteen Republican lawmakers responded by threatening to impeach “responsible members of this Court” for “willful neglect of duty, incompetency and misconduct” if the justices held Hoskins in contempt; the court did so anyway. asserted
court → respond → contempt
Hoskins backed down and instructed local election officials to distribute ballots using the old map; the justices decided not to have him arrested. asserted
him → back → map
The drama played out as Republicans in Missouri and elected officials nationwide have sought to weaken institutions that limit their power. asserted
that → play → power
In North Carolina, the Republican-dominated General Assembly stripped authority from Democratic governors. asserted
Assembly → dominate → governors
In Wisconsin, Republicans threatened to impeach a newly elected Supreme Court justice to protect gerrymandered maps. asserted
Republicans → threaten → maps
And in New York, Democrats bypassed an independent commission to pass a gerrymander that favored them, but the state’s highest court struck it down. asserted
court → bypass → it
Rather than electing top judges, as Illinois does, or giving the governor primary responsibility for choosing them, like California, Missouri selects its appellate and Supreme Court judges through a commission made up of three lawyers, one elected by lawyers in each appellate district; three non-lawyers appointed by the governor, one from each district; and a state Supreme Court judge selected by the court. asserted
Missouri → elect → court
After they are appointed, judges face a retention vote at the first general election after completing one year in office, then every 12 years, with voters deciding whether they keep their positions. asserted
they → appoint → positions
In response to the controversy, a number of Missouri Republicans have attacked the system. asserted
number → attack → system
U.S. Rep. Jason Smith called for the state to switch to electing its Supreme Court judges. asserted
state → call → judges
Republican Party executive director Miles Ross declared on X, “The Missouri Plan is done.” asserted
Plan → declare → X
Dan Seitz, chief of staff to Sen. Brad Hudson, called for replacing it with a system in which the governor could nominate judges directly, subject to Senate confirmation. uncertain
governor → call → confirmation
State Rep. Cathy Jo Loy, a Carthage Republican who has introduced legislation in each of the past two sessions to replace the Missouri Plan with gubernatorial appointment and Senate confirmation, said she intends to file a new proposal Dec. 1, the first day lawmakers can file bills for next year’s session. asserted
lawmakers → introduce → session
Loy said her opposition to the system predates the recent clashes with the Supreme Court. asserted
opposition → say → Court
But she acknowledged that those defeats could give the proposal new momentum. uncertain
defeats → acknowledge → momentum
“There will probably be more appetite because there are several senators that feel the same way,” she said. asserted
she → be → ?
Republicans, who hold every statewide elected office, supermajorities in both chambers of the legislature and six of the state’s eight congressional seats, seem to have suddenly found the limits of their power. asserted
who → hold → power
At the ballot box, voters have overwhelmingly rejected major pieces of the party’s agenda, including an effort to weaken their power to bypass the legislature by amending the constitution or putting laws passed by lawmakers to a statewide vote. asserted
voters → reject → vote
Time and again, when elected officials have sought to limit voters’ use of the ballot initiative, the courts have protected voters’ use of direct democracy. asserted
courts → elect → democracy
Courts repeatedly rewrote ballot summaries prepared by Republican state officials that they found unfair or misleading, including language describing the initiative that ultimately established abortion rights in 2024. asserted
that → rewrite → 2024
By the end of that year, after the Missouri Supreme Court rejected a last-minute effort by Republican lawmakers and anti-abortion activists to keep the abortion measure off the ballot, Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O’Laughlin was calling to repeal the Missouri Plan. asserted
O’Laughlin → reject → Plan
She proposed replacing the system for selecting Supreme Court and appellate judges with a nonpartisan election. asserted
She → propose → election
But her bill stalled in committee. asserted
bill → stall → committee
…and 23 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support