The Aporia
The Straits Times. (2026, October 15). US rejects recommendation for ICE body cams to be automatically activated. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/us-rejects-recommendation-for-ice-body-cams-to-be-automatically-activated
The Straits Times. “US rejects recommendation for ICE body cams to be automatically activated.” The Straits Times, 15 Oct. 2026, https://www.straitstimes.com/world/us-rejects-recommendation-for-ice-body-cams-to-be-automatically-activated.
The Straits Times. “US rejects recommendation for ICE body cams to be automatically activated.” The Straits Times, October 15, 2026. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/us-rejects-recommendation-for-ice-body-cams-to-be-automatically-activated.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
On October 14, 2026, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report recommending that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) update its guidelines for body camera usage, including automatic activation during unexpected incidents. However, on October 15, the Trump administration rejected this recommendation, citing privacy and operational risks. The GAO report also highlighted the need for ICE to improve its body-worn camera program management since updates were last made in 2024, amid growing scrutiny over enforcement tactics following fatal shootings of two US citizens in Minneapolis. The report suggested that automatic activation would help ensure proper footage capture and accountability, but ICE maintains that additional controls are necessary to comply with policy without automatic features.
The Trump administration has rejected a government watchdog's recommendation that US immigration officials should use technology that would automatically activate body-worn cameras when an officer pulls their weapon or sets off a car siren.
The recommendation comes as US agencies face mounting scrutiny over enforcement tactics used in an immigration crackdown that has included fatal shootings of two US citizens in Minneapolis, raising questions about officers' accountability.
Rights advocates say the crackdown has violated due process and free speech rights and created an unsafe environment, particularly for ethnic minorities, who have raised concerns about racial profiling.