Appeals court will hear arguments on National Guard deployment in nation's capital
The District of Columbia is set to argue in federal appeals court about the National Guard's deployment in the city
WASHINGTON --
asserted
District → hear → city
More than 14 months after National Guard members began patrolling the streets of the nation's capital, a federal appeals court on Wednesday will hear arguments over whether they should be sent home.
asserted
they → begin → arguments
Oral arguments are scheduled in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
asserted
arguments → schedule → Circuit
The hearing comes months after the court paused a lower court's ruling that the deployment was illegal.
asserted
deployment → come → ruling
President Donald Trump deployed the guard in August 2025 as part of what he said was a crime-fighting mission in Washington, D.C.
asserted
he → deploy → Washington
The force, which rose to a peak of about 5,000 troops over the summer, has supported arrest operations, patrolled city streets and neighborhoods and participated in cleanup efforts.
asserted
which → rise → efforts
Trump's Republican administration says the deployment has contributed to a decrease in crime in the city, where crime was already on the decline before the National Guard arrived.
asserted
Guard → say → decline
Officials and activists in the overwhelmingly Democratic city say the deployment is a waste of taxpayer money and has normalized the militarization of a major American city.
asserted
deployment → say → city
At the heart of the court case, brought by D.C.'s attorney general, is whether the president has the authority to deploy the National Guard to the city, which, as a federal district, has limited autonomy over its own affairs.
asserted
which → bring → affairs
The U.S. Constitution gives federal lawmakers authority over the District of Columbia, while the Home Rule Act of 1973 lets residents elect a mayor, a council and neighborhood commissioners.
asserted
residents → give → mayor
The city has argued that the mobilization is an illegal use of the military for domestic law enforcement.
asserted
mobilization → argue → enforcement
Last December, the three-judge panel that paused the lower court's ruling said Trump might prevail in his argument that the president “possesses a unique power” to mobilize the guard in Washington.
uncertain
president → pause → Washington
The court went on to say in a unanimous 32-page ruling that other factors also favored the Trump administration, including the “disruption to the lives of thousands of service members,” as well as what it said was the president’s interest “in the protection of federal governmental functions and property within the nation’s capital.
asserted
it → go → capital
The judges found that the district “has not identified any ongoing injury to its statutory interests.”
asserted
district → find → interests
Even if D.C. wins at the appeals court level, the Trump administration will undoubtedly go to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has already shown deference to the president in a number of cases.
asserted
which → win → cases
Syracuse law professor William Banks said D.C. might have a slim argument under its home rule, questioning whether National Guard units can be deployed to the city when it isn’t authorized by local law.
uncertain
it → say → law
But, he said, outside of that argument “there is no overarching federal principle that would bail out the district in this case.
asserted
that → say → case
Because D.C. is not a state and because the president is commander in chief, there’s a "tremendous amount of leeway and discretion for the president” to control or delegate control of the local National Guard and out-of-state units, Banks said.
asserted
Banks → ’ → state
Margaret Hu, a professor at the William and Mary School of Law, said one issue to look for was raised by states supporting the deployment in court briefs.
asserted
issue → say → briefs
They argued the president was reacting to an emergency.
asserted
president → argue → emergency
Hu said the open-ended manner of the deployment might allow a challenge to that.
uncertain
manner → say → that
“Some argue that the indefinite nature of the deployment means that there’s no emergency justification here,” she said.
asserted
she → argue → deployment
U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb concluded last November that Trump’s military takeover in Washington illegally intrudes on local officials’ authority to direct law enforcement in the district.
asserted
takeover → conclude → district
Cobb found that while the president does have authority to protect federal functioning and property, he can’t unilaterally deploy the D.C. National Guard to help with crime control as he sees fit or call in troops from other states.
asserted
he → find → states
She put her order on hold for 21 days to allow the appeal by the Trump administration.
asserted
She → put → administration
The appeals court stayed the order and has allowed the guard to remain in place while the case is pending.
asserted
case → stay → place
The mobilization, extended until January 2029 by the Defense Department, has taken on a sense of permanence, despite the court case.
asserted
mobilization → extend → case
The federal government awarded a $292 million contract to a private company to provide members of the Joint Task Force-D.C. with apartments.
asserted
government → award → apartments
The numbers have grown as well, ballooning to around 5,000 during the height of the semiquincentennial celebration.
asserted
numbers → grow → celebration
As of last week, that number had dropped to about 2,900.
asserted
number → drop → 2,900
The Aporia
