The Aporia
Ma, S. (2026, October 14). What does the historic Bank of America fine mean for US-China capital streams? South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3370870/what-does-historic-bank-america-fine-mean-us-china-capital-streams?utm_source=rss_feed
Ma, Sylvia. “What does the historic Bank of America fine mean for US-China capital streams?” South China Morning Post, 14 Oct. 2026, https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3370870/what-does-historic-bank-america-fine-mean-us-china-capital-streams?utm_source=rss_feed.
Ma, Sylvia. “What does the historic Bank of America fine mean for US-China capital streams?” South China Morning Post, October 14, 2026. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3370870/what-does-historic-bank-america-fine-mean-us-china-capital-streams?utm_source=rss_feed.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
As of October 14, 2026, the US Treasury Department fined Bank of America $1.2 billion for failing to detect and report suspicious activities related to money laundering and sanctions violations, including Chinese money-laundering networks. This is the third-largest fine in the department's history and the largest ever imposed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The fine includes an $11.6 million settlement with the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control for apparent sanctions violations involving Iran, Russia, narcotics, and global terrorism.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that when large banks fail to meet their anti-money laundering obligations, they expose the entire US financial system to significant illicit finance risks. The consent order requires Bank of America to hire an independent third party to review past transactions for national security-related risks and implement stronger internal controls against future violations.
Analysts say penalties signal tighter scrutiny over cross-border financial flows
Bank of America had failed to report more than US$5 billion in suspicious transactions in a timely manner, including more than US$1 billion involving national security-related and other priority risks such as “suspicious transactions indicative of Chinese money-laundering networks, fraud and potential trade-based money-laundering with a substantial nexus to the southwest border”