TV Station News Managers Fired for Allegedly Anti-Gay Memo Win >$4M from Nexstar Media

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, October 14). TV Station News Managers Fired for Allegedly Anti-Gay Memo Win >$4M from Nexstar Media. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/14/tv-station-news-managers-fired-for-allegedly-anti-gay-memo-win-4m-from-nexstar-media/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-14 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

In March 2023, a court decision allowed Amy Fox and Stanton Tang, former senior news managers at WOOD-TV (owned by Nexstar Media Group), to proceed with their lawsuit claiming wrongful termination after an internal memo they wrote or approved was misinterpreted as anti-gay. The managers were fired in June 2023 following public backlash and media scrutiny of the memo; they now assert that Nexstar fired them to deflect blame from the company for the controversy. Judgment was recently delivered, with Fox and Tang winning over $4 million from Nexstar Media Group.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Amy Fox and Stanton Tang, senior news managers at WOOD-TV (an NBC affiliate owned by Nexstar Media Group), won a lawsuit against their former employer for wrongful termination. The case stemmed from an internal memo they either wrote or approved regarding coverage of Pride-month events in 2023. Fox and Tang alleged that after the memo was misinterpreted as anti-gay and leaked externally, management falsely portrayed them as anti-gay to deflect blame onto them while protecting the company's image. They were fired shortly thereafter, and a jury awarded them over $4 million in damages. The lawsuit highlighted issues of corporate transparency and employee rights regarding internal communications and disciplinary actions.

Written for “TV Station Executives Firing Settlement” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 79241: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-14

Story

📰 TV Station Executives Firing Settlement
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
70
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
12 of 70 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 721 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
137 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 However, when it came to Pride events, the newsroom was deviating from its typical editorial review process, and many reporters were beginning to go cover stories about Pride festivals as soon as they heard that the event was taking place—without discussing with the rest of the newsroom whether the story ought to be covered, whether it was duplicative of another story that had recently aired, or whether some unique aspect of the story could be explored in a way that highlighted the story's overall newsworthiness.
🔮 The Court will grant that motion as well, finding that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed not only on their due process claim, but also on their two First Amendment claims.
🔮 But if you submit exclusively to us before that, we will give you an answer within 14 days; and then if you'd like to have it published quickly, we can publish it in within a few months, if it's sufficiently clean and cite-checked by your research assistant.
🔮 Two NAMI supporters, whom we will call "June" and "Lynn," names we have randomly chosen in the interest of their privacy, were employees of a large health-insurance company and arrived early to set up a picnic area and booth to greet their participating coworkers and provide information about their employer.
🔮 And since the 1800s, courts have justified the rule, in part, based on the concern that affording every member of a large group a cause of action would threaten to stifle "free discussion" beneath an avalanche of "embittered and boundless litigation."
🔮 But Michelle Evans could have conveyed her political views without publishing the photo.
🔮 From the Sept. 30 decision in People v. Barraza by California Court of Appeal Justice Richard Huffman, joined by Justices William Dato and Truc Do: [1.] Alberto Jorge Barraza cut off parts of Nikko G.'s hair with a knife as Nikko tried to fight him off. Barraza stabbed Nikko in the leg, severing an artery and killing him.
🔮 In her deposition, [mother-in-law] explained her eye condition as one that could be corrected with reading glasses; she further explained that it made it hard for her to make jewelry, but that she made jewelry more as a hobby and did not support herself by making jewelry.
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · Outlaw vs. In-Law Outlaw
🔮 He will speak about his experience, and his approach to liberty, both in his time as a lawyer and in his time as a judge.
🔮 The requirements of paragraph a. shall not apply if compliance would impose an operational or financial burden on the state or local entity and their employees.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-14 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 137 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Fox Fox v. Nexstar Media Group, Inc. Nexstar Pride W.D. Mich.

Subjects

Tang PERSON · 9× Fox ORG · 7× Nexstar ORG · 6× WOOD-TV ORG · 3× Amy Fox PERSON · 2× Stanton Tang PERSON · 2× WOOD-TV's ORG · 2× Fox v. Nexstar Media Group, Inc. ORG · 1× Robert Jonker PERSON · 1× W.D. Mich. GPE · 1×

Narrative

That Act makes it illegal to "'divulge a disciplinary report, letter of reprimand, or other disciplinary action to a third party' without first providing the employee with written notice that such information is being shared"; plaintiffs alleged that Nexstar had "notif[ied] third-party news outlets about disciplinary action that was being taken against Fox and Tang without first notifying them of such disclosures."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 However, when it came to Pride events, the newsroom was deviating from its typical editorial review process, and many reporters were beginning to go cover stories about Pride festivals as soon as they heard that the event was taking place—without discussing with the rest of the newsroom whether the story ought to be covered, whether it was duplicative of another story that had recently aired, or whether some unique aspect of the story could be explored in a way that highlighted the story's overall newsworthiness.

Claims (70 extracted, 12 hedged)

The verdict came Friday; here's the backstory, from a decision in March in Fox v. Nexstar Media Group, Inc. by Judge Robert Jonker (W.D. Mich.), allowing plaintiffs' claims to go forward: uncertain
claims → come → Jonker
These cases arise from the fallout over an internal memo that two senior news managers at WOOD‑TV—Amy Fox and Stanton Tang—either wrote or approved regarding coverage of Pride-month events. asserted
managers → arise → events
According to Fox and Tang, management initially agreed that the memo merely restated corporate policy, but after some colleagues misinterpreted the memo as being anti‑gay—and after the memo was leaked externally—management allegedly shifted its stance and planted news stories that portrayed Fox and Tang as anti‑gay. uncertain
that → accord → Fox
The plaintiffs contend Nexstar did this to cause Fox and Tang to absorb the blame for the controversy while allowing the company to emerge unscathed. asserted
company → contend → controversy
In early June of 2023, Stanton Tang began to feel concerned about WOOD-TV's coverage of Pride-related events. asserted
Tang → begin → events
To him, it seemed that the newsroom's approach to Pride coverage differed from its approach to coverage of other events, such as women's history month or black history month. asserted
approach → seem → month
As Tang tells it, when it came to the latter events, the newsroom tried to approach coverage in a unified way, to ensure that coverage was diversified, newsworthy, and spread throughout the month. asserted
coverage → tell → month
However, when it came to Pride events, the newsroom was deviating from its typical editorial review process, and many reporters were beginning to go cover stories about Pride festivals as soon as they heard that the event was taking place—without discussing with the rest of the newsroom whether the story ought to be covered, whether it was duplicative of another story that had recently aired, or whether some unique aspect of the story could be explored in a way that highlighted the story's overall newsworthiness. uncertain
that → come → newsworthiness
Tang was also worried that the volume of Pride stories being covered by WOOD-TV news staff was alienating some of the station's more conservative viewers. asserted
volume → worry → viewers
On the morning of June 13, 2023, Tang shared his concerns with his Assistant News Director, Amy Fox. asserted
Tang → share → Director
He explained that he wanted to ensure that any Pride‑related reporting included appropriate historical context and that the newsroom was approaching the topic consistently. asserted
newsroom → explain → topic
To address these concerns, he asked Fox to draft an email to the newsroom. asserted
he → address → newsroom
Fox did so and then shared her proposed email with Tang. asserted
Fox → do → Tang
Tang added a few more lines to the email—including a directive for reporters to "get both sides of the issue" when covering Pride events—and told Fox to send the memo to all staff, which she did…. asserted
she → add → which
Many coworkers opposed the memo, and some leaked it to outside media outlets, which reached out to Nexstar for comment. asserted
which → oppose → comment
Fox and Tang were eventually fired, and Nexstar released two statements that were then quoted by other media outlets: [1.] Diversity, equity, and inclusion are among Nexstar's core values. asserted
Diversity → fire → values
Our local TV stations are expected to cover and report the news of the day in an expansive and inclusive fashion, consistent with these values. asserted
stations → expect → values
We're looking into the situation at WOOD-TV, as the communication regarding the station's coverage of PRIDE month activities in the area is not consistent with Nexstar's values, the way we cover the news, or the respect we have for our viewers. asserted
we → look → viewers
We will take appropriate action as necessary to address this situation, and apologize for offending members of the LGBTQ community and WOOD-TV's viewers…. asserted
We → take → community
[2.] We can confirm that WOOD-TV made changes to its newsroom leadership team to ensure its ability to continue providing outstanding local news coverage and service to the Grand Rapids community and surrounding area. asserted
TV → confirm → community
As these are internal personnel decisions involving matters of personal privacy, we will decline further comment. asserted
we → involve → comment
Nexstar's communications director, Gary Weitman" also responded to media queries by saying, in response to a query about whether the firings were "a result of the investigation into the memo," "I think that's a fair assumption … but again not attributable." asserted
that → respond → memo
The court concluded that Tang and Fox had adequately alleged that statements about them were untrue: asserted
statements → conclude → them
Nexstar's theory seems to be that the only potentially untrue statement that the plaintiffs can point to is Nexstar's statement that "the communication regarding the station's coverage of PRIDE month activities in the area is not consistent with Nexstar's values, the way we cover the news, or the respect we have for our viewers." asserted
we → seem → viewers
However, according to Nexstar, there is no question about the truthfulness of this statement because Nexstar's corporate leadership team is the only group of people that can define what Nexstar's values are and because that leadership team has concluded that the memo was not in line with those values…. uncertain
memo → accord → values
First, the record contains evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude that some members of Nexstar's leadership team did believe the memo aligned with Nexstar's values. uncertain
memo → contain → values
Most significantly, Julie Brinks—the plaintiffs' direct manager—indicated numerous times that she believed the memo was in line with Nexstar's journalistic standards, that it did not discriminate against anyone, and that it was being misinterpreted by some members of the news staff. asserted
it → indicate → staff
Because Julie Brinks was the person responsible for conveying to the plaintiffs how WOOD-TV was supposed to report the news, a reasonable jury could find her beliefs about the memo and about Nexstar's values and policies especially relevant concerning the question of the statement's truthfulness. uncertain
beliefs → convey → truthfulness
More importantly, though, Nexstar's argument is also flawed because Nexstar fails to recognize that, under Michigan law, a literally true statement can still be actionable. asserted
statement → fail → law
Often, two true statements can be juxtaposed in such a way that they imply an idea that is false, which, under Michigan law, gives rise to a cause of action for defamation. asserted
which → juxtapose → defamation
Reighard offers a good example of how this type of defamation—often referred to as "defamation by implication"—typically occurs. asserted
type → offer → defamation
On February 20, 2019, the university announced that Reighard had been placed on leave and that an investigation was under way. asserted
investigation → announce → way
The university did not provide any details about the investigation or the reason for Reighard's leave. asserted
university → provide → leave
Still, an ESPN reporter who had previously authored a book about the Larry Nassar sex-abuse scandal tweeted about the university's announcement in a two-part twitter post. asserted
who → author → post
The reporter's first tweet read: Michigan's attorney general announced today her office is taking over an investigation of John Geddert, the 2012 Olympic team head coach and close friend of Larry Nassar. asserted
office → read → Nassar
Several gymnasts have publicly abused [sic] Geddert of physically and mentally harming them. And his second tweet read: On the same day as the AG's announcement, Central Michigan said it was putting longtime gymnastics coach Jerry Reighard on leave amid an internal review. asserted
it → abuse → review
No details of the review were shared, but Reighard has a long personal and professional relationship with Geddert. asserted
Reighard → share → Geddert
Read together, the obvious message implied by the tweets is that Reighard was placed on leave in connection with the Nassar scandal. asserted
Reighard → read → scandal
Because every statement contained in each tweet was literally true, however, the reporter saw no need for a retraction. asserted
reporter → contain → retraction
So Reighard sued for defamation…. asserted
Reighard → sue → defamation
…and 30 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support