STEPHEN GLOVER: Burnham's childlike and baffling devotion to the flagging EU threatens to plunge us into very dark waters

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Glover, S. (2026, October 14). STEPHEN GLOVER: Burnham's childlike and baffling devotion to the flagging EU threatens to plunge us into very dark waters. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/debate/article-16206775/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Burnhams-childlike-baffling-devotion-EU-threatens-plunge-dark-waters.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-14 · by Stephen Glover analysis

Quick Summary

Columnist Stephen Glover criticizes Labour politician Andy Burnham, arguing that Burnham's recent statements supporting rejoining the European Union and questioning the validity of the 2016 Brexit referendum reveal him as both foolish and dishonest. Glover contends that Burnham’s political ambitions are misguided and could alienate voters who support Brexit. The column specifically highlights Burnham's claims about Russian interference in the 2016 referendum, which Glover dismisses based on statements from intelligence officials who dispute such allegations.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 14, 2026, Stephen Glover critiques Labour Party leader Andy Burnham's devotion to rejoining the EU in his column. Glover argues that Burnham's push for closer ties with the EU threatens Britain's growth and security, despite Britain outpacing France, Germany, and Italy economically since Brexit. While some see Burnham as reviving the Labour party after Sir Keir Starmer's leadership, Glover dismisses Burnham as "a prize dud" who lacks political acumen compared to even his predecessor.

Written for “Jeremy Burnham's Eue Devotion” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 78892: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-14

Story

📰 Jeremy Burnham's Eue Devotion
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 25% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 20% hedged 6 of 30 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles discuss different aspects of Andy Burnham's political rise and the overall political climate, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 40% hedged 2 of 5 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A describes Burnham's call for closer EU ties and a speech at Labour conference, while Article B is an opinion piece criticizing Burnham's stance on the EU.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 21% hedged 3 of 14 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A describes Burnham's planned Commons address about seeking a closer relationship with the EU, while Article B is an opinion piece critiquing Burnham's stance on the EU.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 3 of 18 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A describes Burnham's planned speech urging closer EU ties, while Article B is a commentary criticizing Burnham's stance and political situation.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 4 of 69 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles discuss different aspects of Andy Burnham's political situation and strategy, not a single specific incident.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 21% hedged 6 of 28 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of Andy Burnham's potential actions and impact on British politics, without focusing on a single identical incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 17% hedged 3 of 18 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss different aspects of Andy Burnham's stance on EU relations; Article A reports his statement to MPs, while Article B provides commentary and criticism of Burnham's position.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 24 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles discuss different aspects of Burnham's stance on EU relations; Article A describes his upcoming Commons address, while Article B provides a critical commentary on his views and political strategy.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 21% hedged 7 of 33 📰 publisher trust 72
“Article A reports on PM Burnham's plans for post-Brexit deals with the EU, while Article B is an opinion piece criticizing Burnham's approach to EU relations.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 14 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles discuss different aspects of Andy Burnham's stance on Brexit and his political influence, without clearly reporting on the exact same incident or time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
55
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
25%
14 of 55 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 5407 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Stephen Glover
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 They reckon that after a triumphant election victory he will be able to take Britain back to the supposedly golden 1970s.
🔮 Next month the American people will have the chance to punish Trump in the mid-term Congressional elections.
🔮 I’ll skip over William Hague, Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard, because none of them achieved power, and alight on David Cameron.
🔮 Over the weekend we learnt that Heathrow Airport’s third runway will be delayed another four years.
🔮 I’m cross with Nigel Farage for presiding over so amateurish a shambles that two of his senior aides could succumb to such an obvious ambush.
🔮 In fact, he was only putting right a problem of Labour’s own making, which a more astute politician would have spotted weeks ago.
Also by Stephen Glover
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Stephen Glover →

Topics

Brexit Britain Labour Russian Russians

Subjects

Burnham PERSON · 6× Andy Burnham PERSON · 3× Labour ORG · 3× Britain GPE · 2× Russian NORP · 2× Russians NORP · 2× Andy Burnham's PERSON · 1× Greens ORG · 1× Reform UK ORG · 1× the Lib Dems ORG · 1×

Narrative

He said on Monday when discussing getting closer to the EU: 'If we are serious about promoting growth, controlling immigration, upholding our values and security, it is a conversation we must have.' Yet in fact Britain has grown faster than the EU's three biggest economies, France, Germany and Italy, since the Brexit referendum.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 They reckon that after a triumphant election victory he will be able to take Britain back to the supposedly golden 1970s.

Claims (55 extracted, 14 hedged)

The Greens are reeling, the Lib Dems are plotting to get rid of their leaden leader, and Reform UK is mired in allegations of sleaze. asserted
UK → reel → sleaze
Many Labour MPs believe our unelected Prime Minister has been working his magic. asserted
Minister → believe → magic
Some think he should take advantage of the 'Burnham bounce' and call an election. asserted
he → think → election
There is a feeling among Andy Burnham's supporters that he's a gifted politician who is reviving his party following the catatonic leadership of Sir Keir Starmer. asserted
who → be → Starmer
They reckon that after a triumphant election victory he will be able to take Britain back to the supposedly golden 1970s. asserted
he → reckon → 1970s
May I dissent from this upbeat analysis, which I regret to say is shared by some nervous souls on the Right? uncertain
I → dissent → Right
The more I see of Burnham, the more convinced I am that, far from being the saviour his cheerleaders claim, he is a prize dud, against whom Starmer will soon seem a towering genius. uncertain
Starmer → see → whom
Burnham was a failed national politician when he went to Manchester to become its mayor, and his nine-year sojourn in that great city has blunted such political acumen as he once possessed. asserted
he → fail → acumen
He evidently believes, for example, that the European Union is a dynamic economic bloc which Britain must rejoin if it is to enjoy the growth Labour leaders have continually promised. asserted
leaders → believe → growth
In the past few days Andy Burnham has dug what may become his political grave. uncertain
what → dig → days
He has made it plain that he'd like to take us back into the EU, and hasn't denied that a pledge to do so could be included in Labour's next election manifesto. uncertain
pledge → make → manifesto
He also cast doubt on the validity of the 2016 Brexit referendum by telling The Rest Is Politics podcast (hosted by ex-Blairite spin doctor Alastair Campbell and ex-Tory minister Rory Stewart, both EU fanatics) that the Russians clearly interfered with the result. asserted
Russians → cast → result
In the past few days Andy Burnham has dug what may become his political grave, writes Stephen Glover In so doing, Burnham has revealed himself as a fool and a knave. uncertain
Burnham → dig → fool
A fool for resuscitating Brexit divisions and for risking so much political capital in a doomed cause – namely rejoining the lumbering behemoth that is the EU. asserted
that → resuscitate → behemoth
And a knave for saying something on the podcast that isn't true. asserted
that → say → podcast
On Monday in the Commons he was forced to retract his claim of Russian interference in the Brexit referendum, and instead insisted that 'Russian actors sought to interfere in the 2019 general election'. uncertain
actors → force → election
Various authorities have debunked the notion that Russia influenced the Brexit result. asserted
Russia → debunk → result
In 2018 the head of MI5 declared there was no evidence it had. asserted
it → declare → MI5
The present holder of that job, Ken McCallum, said yesterday that the Russians tried to interfere, though that doesn't mean they had any impact. asserted
they → say → impact
Burnham's claim on the podcast was a shameless attempt to discredit Brexit. uncertain
claim → discredit → Brexit
It was the sort of wild allegation one might hear at a Rejoiner dinner party from hell – but one doesn't expect it from a prime minister who wants to be thought honest. uncertain
who → hear → minister
On the knave rather than the fool side of the ledger, I should add that the PM's enthusiasm for the EU contradicts what he told the largely pro-Brexit voters of Makerfield in May's by-election. uncertain
he → add → election
He said categorically: 'I am not proposing that the UK considers rejoining the EU.' asserted
UK → say → EU
It is exactly what he is now proposing. asserted
he → propose → what
Andy Burnham likes to present himself as being above party politics, and unsullied by its low ethical standards. asserted
Burnham → like → standards
Yet would even that political Houdini Tony Blair have told such a brazen whopper? asserted
Houdini → tell → whopper
I can't say I'm surprised because I never imagined for a moment that the King of the North was straightforward. asserted
King → say → North
But I am taken aback that he is turning out to be such a political clot. asserted
he → take → ?
Why is he prepared to expend so much political capital on a rotten cause? asserted
he → prepare → cause
A cause that could bring no economic benefit but is so divisive that it would almost certainly finish off Burnham's prime ministership. uncertain
it → bring → ministership
He said on Monday when discussing getting closer to the EU: 'If we are serious about promoting growth, controlling immigration, upholding our values and security, it is a conversation we must have.' Yet in fact Britain has grown faster than the EU's three biggest economies, France, Germany and Italy, since the Brexit referendum. asserted
Britain → say → referendum
Yesterday, the International Monetary Fund forecast that the UK would do better than all three countries this year as well. asserted
UK → forecast → countries
All right, no one is pretending that the British economy is thriving under Labour after the unlamented Rachel Reeves raised taxes to record levels. asserted
Reeves → pretend → levels
But it is at least outperforming Europe's leading countries – running on three spluttering cylinders rather than two. asserted
it → outperform → cylinders
Vladimir Putin's Russian regime has repeatedly been accused of trying to influence democracies in the West, including the UK's referendum on EU membership As for Burnham's contention that getting closer to or rejoining the EU would help control immigration, that really is bunkum. asserted
that → accuse → immigration
Membership would mean accepting the free movement of people. asserted
Membership → mean → people
Legally, we now have control of our borders. asserted
we → have → borders
Our leaders just don't bother to exert it. asserted
leaders → bother → it
It's as though he doesn't know what is going on. asserted
what → know → ?
Why is he so keen to nuzzle up to a union whose three biggest countries could soon be controlled by hard-Right governments? uncertain
countries → nuzzle → governments
…and 15 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support