Douglas Murray: The International Criminal Court Is a Sham

Read the original at The Free Press ↗
Cite

Murray, D. (2026, October 13). Douglas Murray: The International Criminal Court Is a Sham. The Free Press. https://www.thefp.com/p/douglas-murray-international-criminal-court-us-sanctions

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Free Press · collected 2026-10-13 · by Douglas Murray analysis

Quick Summary

Douglas Murray argues that the International Criminal Court (ICC) has become a politicized institution used against Western countries. He notes that while European nations initially criticized the U.S. for not joining the ICC, the U.S.'s refusal has proven justified due to the court's potential misuse. For instance, in 2002, Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón attempted to summon Henry Kissinger as a witness regarding South American dictatorships' human rights abuses, highlighting the risk of foreign courts targeting Americans and their allies. Recently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced sanctions against U.S. individuals or businesses interacting with the ICC, emphasizing that America is not subject to its jurisdiction.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-13, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Douglas Murray argues in The Free Press that the International Criminal Court (ICC) has become politicized, serving as a tool to criticize specific nations rather than upholding international law impartially. He highlights the International Association of Genocide Scholars, which gained prominence last year by accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza, and mentions the International Court of Justice's involvement in fast-tracking this allegation. Murray also notes the United Nations Human Rights Council’s focus on Israel with a standing agenda item dedicated to it. The ICC, founded in 2002, is criticized for aligning more with political agendas than justice, as evident from its treatment of cases involving Israel and other nations. The U.S., under both Democrat and Republican administrations since the Bush era, has refused to recognize the ICC's jurisdiction over American officials, preferring that their actions be judged by domestic legal systems instead.

Written for “ICC Criticism” on 2026-10-15, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 ICC Criticism
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different aspects of the ICC without describing the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
96/100
The Free Press's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Free Press · 294 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Douglas Murray
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Why would the U.S. refuse to recognize the jurisdiction of something as noble-sounding as the ICC?
🔮 No European country would allow American planes to even stop and refuel on European soil.
🔮 But most of all, the attack—and the successful averting of what could have been a mass-casualty terrorist event—is a reminder of something bigger: that Israel and the West remain at war with Islamic radicals, and that it is a war we are winning.
2026-09-30 · assertive framing · Douglas Murray: Israel Is Winning
🔮 Which is not to say that it does not have people within it who could be described as far right, or that it could not become such a party in the future.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · Douglas Murray: Who’s Afraid of the ‘Far Right’?
Also by Douglas Murray
Douglas Murray: Israel Is Winning
2026-09-30 · The Free Press
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American ICC U.S. state the International Association of Genocide Scholars

Subjects

American NORP · 6× ICC ORG · 5× U.S. GPE · 4× Kissinger PERSON · 2× state ORG · 2× Gaza GPE · 1× ICJ ORG · 1× Israel GPE · 1× the International Association of Genocide Scholars ORG · 1× the International Court of Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

There is the International Association of Genocide Scholars, an organization that suddenly leaped to prominence last year when it was reactivated in order to accuse Israel of “genocide” in Gaza; there is the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a politicized pseudo-court that seems determined to fast-track that same genocide allegation; there is the United Nations Human Rights Council, whose only standing agenda item devoted to a single country is, yes, about the Jewish state; and the list goes on.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-13
🔮 Why would the U.S. refuse to recognize the jurisdiction of something as noble-sounding as the ICC?
2026-10-13 · The Free Press
Douglas Murray: The International Criminal Court Is a Sham · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 1 hedged)

Recent years have seen a flourishing of BS institutions. asserted
years → see → institutions
There is the International Association of Genocide Scholars, an organization that suddenly leaped to prominence last year when it was reactivated in order to accuse Israel of “genocide” in Gaza; there is the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a politicized pseudo-court that seems determined to fast-track that same genocide allegation; there is the United Nations Human Rights Council, whose only standing agenda item devoted to a single country is, yes, about the Jewish state; and the list goes on. asserted
list → be → state
But the institution that must win any and all awards for not being what it says on the tin is the International Criminal Court (ICC). asserted
it → win → tin
Founded in 2002, the ICC has served as a political tool for a quarter century. asserted
ICC → found → century
In the 2000s, European signatories routinely criticized the George W. Bush administration for not signing up the U.S. to be a member of the new institution. asserted
signatories → criticize → institution
But the Bush administration took the view that all Democrat and Republican administrations have taken before and since: No American statesman or soldier should ever find his actions judged under the jurisdiction of a foreign court. asserted
actions → take → court
Many Europeans count this as evidence of American barbarism. asserted
Europeans → count → barbarism
Why would the U.S. refuse to recognize the jurisdiction of something as noble-sounding as the ICC? asserted
U.S. → refuse → ICC
The reasons, in the years since, have become quite clear. asserted
reasons → become → years
To take only one notable example, in 2002, when the court was being established, Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón sought to call former secretary of state Henry Kissinger as a witness for an investigation into human rights abuses by South American military dictatorships. asserted
Garzón → take → dictatorships
Garzón wanted to question Kissinger about what the U.S. government knew about these alleged abuses. asserted
government → want → abuses
Authorities in Britain, where Kissinger was staying at the time, denied the request. asserted
Kissinger → stay → request
But the incident served as an important reminder: If the U.S. ever submitted to a foreign court, international or foreign criminal jurisdiction could and would be used against America and her allies. uncertain
jurisdiction → serve → America
That is why, at the end of last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio took American opposition to the ICC to a new level: sanctioning American individuals or businesses that transact with the court. asserted
that → take → court
As Rubio said in a statement posted to social media, “We will ban transactions with this rogue court, cutting off their resources and crippling their ability to operate against us because our message is clear: The United States and the American people are not subject to the jurisdiction of this fake ICC.” asserted
States → say → ICC
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support