A Sydney-based currency trader for HIFX Australia (trading as Xe) was fired after being caught in Singapore while claiming to work remotely from home in Sydney. The company tracked Graham’s laptop to a hotel in Singapore, revealing his deception; he claimed an emergency medical situation but provided no proof. Despite returning late and facing a backlog of work, Graham failed to convince the employer of his circumstances, leading Xe to terminate him on grounds of policy violations and loss of trust.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-13,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
Charles Graham, a Sydney-based currency trader for HIFX Australia (trading as Xe), won an unfair dismissal case after being fired in December 2025. He was dismissed when his employer discovered through IT tracking that he had been working from an Ibis hotel in Singapore without permission. Previously, Graham claimed to be working from home while on holiday in Bali, which raised suspicions about his honesty regarding work locations. Although Xe initially denied Graham’s request to relocate to Singapore due to his youth mobility visa expiring by mid-November 2025, he argued that he was required to stay because of his partner's illness and provided documentation. However, the company found no convincing evidence supporting his claims, leading to his dismissal. Despite winning the case, Graham did not receive any compensation as Fair Work Commission commissioner Alana Matheson noted a valid reason for his dismissal due to deliberate non-disclosure of his overseas location.
Written for “Unfair Dismissal Wins For Overseas Wo…” on 2026-10-13,
grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.
A Sydney-based currency trader was fired after he was caught secretly on holiday in Singapore, while telling his employer he was “working from home”.
asserted
he → base → home
Charles Graham had been working for HIFX Australia, which trades as currency exchange company Xe, for 20 months when his employer discovered that both he and his laptop were in Singapore, not Sydney.
asserted
he → work → Singapore
It wasn’t his first undisclosed stint abroad, as Mr Graham previously told his manager that he needed to stay home for a plumber dealing with “some recurring bathroom issues”, but was actually in Bali, according to the Guardian.
uncertain
he → tell → Guardian
Xe had already turned down Graham’s request from September 2025 to relocate to Singapore for a year.
asserted
Xe → turn → year
The trader had a youth mobility visa that he needed to use by mid-November 2025, but the company said his job was based in Sydney and it did not have a licence to operate in Singapore.
asserted
it → have → Singapore
After his request was rejected, Mr Graham sent his workplace a medical certificate that claimed he had an eye injury that required him to work from home for three months.
asserted
that → reject → months
He then allegedly took his annual leave and went on holiday to Singapore.
uncertain
He → take → Singapore
Even though he was due back on 17 November, his manager found that he hadn’t returned to work yet.
asserted
he → find → work
“Our mate should be online today, first day since his holiday, so I will need your FBI skills,” she wrote in an email to an IT employee, according to The Straits Times.
uncertain
she → need → Times
The “FBI skills” tracked him to Singapore’s Ibis hotel.
asserted
skills → track → hotel
Mr Graham said he had intended to return to Australia but had to postpone the flight because his partner developed a bacterial infection and needed medical treatment.
asserted
partner → say → treatment
He told the company that since the change of plans took place over the weekend, he didn’t think to contact his manager outside business hours.
asserted
he → tell → hours
By the time he logged on from Singapore, he claimed to be drowning in hundreds of unread emails, incoming calls, and a complaint from a high-value client, so telling his boss he was still overseas had taken a back seat.
asserted
he → log → seat
Xe didn’t buy it, telling Mr Graham in his December 2025 termination letter that he had failed to produce flight records showing he intended to return to Australia or medical evidence to support his account of his partner’s illness, leaving the company unconvinced by both his reason for staying in Singapore and his failure to tell his manager where he was.
asserted
he → buy → manager
“Your conduct represents a serious breach of company policy, a failure to follow lawful and reasonable instructions, and an irreparable breakdown of trust and confidence,” the letter read.
asserted
letter → represent → trust
Mr Graham challenged his dismissal, taking the case to Australia’s Fair Work Commission, which rules on disputes between employers and employees.
asserted
which → challenge → employers
He argued that his location had been discovered through “illegal tracking surveillance” and said he had previously worked from Bali several times in April and May 2025 without being reprimanded, according to the Australian Financial Review.
uncertain
he → argue → Review
His manager, however, told the commission that she was unaware he had been working from overseas.
asserted
he → tell → commission
Evidence from the company included a message on Microsoft Teams asking to work from home so he could allegedly be present for the plumber.
uncertain
he → include → plumber
Commissioner Alana Matheson found that Mr Graham concealing his location in Bali proved that he knew and understood the company’s policy that he would need permission to work from another country.
asserted
he → find → country
She concluded that his failure to disclose his location before being caught in Singapore “was deliberate and amounted to dishonesty”.
asserted
failure → conclude → dishonesty
The commission also questioned how Xe handled the dismissal, saying that it had not explained its reasons for firing Mr Graham, denying him a fair opportunity to respond.
asserted
it → question → opportunity
It said that it appeared from internal communication that the company had already decided on a course of action, and the discussions were to “give [Graham] a bit of hope to turn up to the meeting”.
asserted
discussions → say → meeting
Mr Graham’s dismissal process was ruled as unfair last week, but the commission acknowledged that Xe had a valid reason to sack him.
asserted
Xe → rule → him
He did not get his job back or receive additional compensation, in light of the fact that he had already received four weeks’ pay in lieu of notice.
asserted
he → get → notice
The Aporia
