Let socialists rob from the rich 100% and you still won’t be able to pay the bills

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Jenkin, T. (2026, September 10). Let socialists rob from the rich 100% and you still won’t be able to pay the bills. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/let-socialists-rob-rich-100-percent-still-wont-able-pay-bills

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-09-10 · by Ted Jenkin

Quick Summary

The article reports that a study by the Cato Institute found that implementing several major proposals from the Democratic Socialists of America's 2026 platform could cost between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade. The article then calculates that confiscating 100% of the wealth held by America's 400 richest people, as well as taking all corporate profits, would cover only about half to two-thirds of the lowest estimate. According to Cato's calculations, raising the income-tax rate on the wealthy could generate only an additional $400 billion in revenue over a decade due to changes in taxpayer behavior.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-10, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Here is a summary of the article:

The Democratic Socialists of America's 2026 platform proposes various government programs that could cost between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade, according to estimates by Cato Institute. To put this into perspective, taking all of the wealth from America's 400 richest people, who collectively hold approximately $6.6 trillion in wealth in 2025, would not be enough to cover even the lower end of this estimate ($71 trillion). This suggests that taxing the rich may not be a viable solution to fund these government programs, as it would require taking nearly all of their wealth and still leave a significant shortfall.

Written for “Economic Reality of Socialism” on 2026-10-25, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Economic Reality of Socialism
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
4 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 5408 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ted Jenkin
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 So yes, your parents may have had a 14% mortgage.
🔮 And it may offer some of the worst bets in America.
🔮 Even if its trust fund reserves are depleted, millions of workers will still be paying Social Security taxes every payday.
🔮 Here are five more ways successful Americans could increasingly find themselves paying even more.
🔮 Cato estimates those proposals could cost somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade.
🔮 We have promised ourselves a government we aren't currently willing to pay for.
🔮 At 35 years old, you might have a mortgage, two kids, a six-figure salary and an MBA degree hanging on the wall.
Also by Ted Jenkin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Ted Jenkin →

Topics

America Cato Social Security The Cato Institute the Democratic Socialists of America

Subjects

Cato ORG · 9× America GPE · 5× Social Security ORG · 2× Americans NORP · 1× British NORP · 1× Congressional Budget Office ORG · 1× Joint Committee on Taxation ORG · 1× The Cato Institute ORG · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the Democratic Socialists of America ORG · 1×

Narrative

Take everything from the 400 richest Americans Cato estimates America's 400 richest people collectively held approximately $6.6 trillion in wealth in 2025.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-10
🔮 Cato estimates those proposals could cost somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade.

Claims (39 extracted, 4 hedged)

Just make billionaires pay their "fair share." asserted
billionaires → make → share
The Cato Institute recently decided to run the numbers on nine major proposals associated with the Democratic Socialists of America's 2026 platform. asserted
Institute → decide → platform
Cato estimates those proposals could cost somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade. uncertain
proposals → estimate → decade
Now, that's a gigantic range and an important caveat to know. asserted
that → know → ?
Cato assembled estimates from multiple studies to illustrate the potential magnitude of these policies. asserted
Cato → assemble → policies
But let's take the low number. asserted
's → let → number
Surely America's billionaires can cover that, right? asserted
billionaires → cover → that
Let's find out. asserted
's → find → ?
Take everything from the 400 richest Americans Cato estimates America's 400 richest people collectively held approximately $6.6 trillion in wealth in 2025. asserted
people → take → 2025
So, let's do something even the most aggressive tax proposal doesn't suggest. asserted
proposal → let → something
You raised $6.6 trillion. asserted
You → raise → trillion
Unfortunately, you've covered only about 9% of Cato's low-end estimate. asserted
you → cover → estimate
Just make billionaires pay their "fair share." asserted
billionaires → make → share
You can only confiscate someone's fortune once. asserted
You → confiscate → fortune
Next year, you need another taxpayer. asserted
you → need → taxpayer
Let's go after corporations. asserted
's → let → corporations
Cato estimates domestic corporations could generate approximately $35 trillion of after-federal-tax profits over the next decade. uncertain
corporations → estimate → decade
Let's take every additional dollar of that, too. asserted
's → let → that
Even then, according to Cato's calculations, you'd cover only about half of its $71 trillion low-end estimate. uncertain
you → accord → estimate
America already has bills. asserted
America → have → bills
The federal government is projected to run roughly $24 trillion in deficits over the coming decade under the baseline cited by Cato. asserted
government → project → Cato
We're already spending money we don't have before adding trillions in new promises. asserted
we → spend → promises
Just raise the income-tax rate Here's where the math gets even more interesting. asserted
math → raise → rate
Cato cites Joint Committee on Taxation economists who studied how much additional revenue could be generated by pushing top federal income-tax rates toward their revenue-maximizing level. uncertain
revenue → cite → level
Cato calculates the additional revenue at roughly $400 billion over 10 years. asserted
Cato → calculate → years
Change tax rates dramatically and people change behavior. asserted
people → change → behavior
They work differently, invest differently, realize income differently and find different legal ways to structure their finances. asserted
They → work → finances
That's why you can't simply take today's income and multiply it by whatever tax rate sounds good on television. asserted
rate → take → television
Eventually, you run out of rich people This is the part politicians don't like discussing. asserted
politicians → run → people
You can argue America should have higher taxes. asserted
America → argue → taxes
You can argue government should provide more services. asserted
government → argue → services
But let's stop pretending there's a magical vault somewhere containing enough billionaire money to pay for every promise Washington wants to make. asserted
Washington → let → promise
Eventually the math works its way down the income ladder. asserted
math → work → ladder
That’s right Uncle DSA Sam wants you. asserted
Sam → ’ → you
You can only confiscate someone's fortune once. asserted
You → confiscate → fortune
Next year, you need another taxpayer. asserted
you → need → taxpayer
British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher famously said the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. asserted
you → say → money
Forty years later, we can debate the politics. asserted
we → debate → politics
But it's getting awfully difficult to debate the math. asserted
it → get → math
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support