Bid to overturn ruling which stops police being sued for failings

Read the original at BBC News ↗
BBC News · collected 2026-10-10 · by Daniel De Simone

Quick Summary

Backbench MPs Andrew Mitchell and Jess Phillips are pushing an amendment to a bill in Parliament to overturn a 2025 Court of Appeal ruling that grants legal immunity to police officers from civil litigation during criminal investigations, even when there are serious failings such as fabrication of evidence or breaches of confidentiality. The case involves a victim of domestic violence whose confidential refuge address was disclosed by the police, leading her to flee again and suffer significant trauma. Mitchell argues this decision will have "devastating consequences" for victims seeking justice against negligent or dishonest policing practices.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-10, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Backbench MPs are trying to reverse a 2025 Court of Appeal ruling that shields police officers from civil lawsuits while they conduct criminal investigations and serve as witnesses. The amendment, proposed by Conservative MP Andrew Mitchell and Labour's Jess Phillips, argues the current law has "devastating consequences" for crime victims who can't sue when there are serious investigative failures. The original court decision prevents legal action against police even if they fabricate evidence or disclose confidential information about victims. A separate appeal to overturn this ruling is scheduled before the Supreme Court in the coming month. MPs want to ensure that police officers lose immunity whenever their actions include grave misconduct during investigations.

Written for “Police Immunity Lawsuit” on 2026-10-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 2 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 71263 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-10

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
31%
8 of 26 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
72.2
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-10 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Police Immunity Lawsuit
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

BBC News · 3058 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)
2026-10-06
Five reasons India's stock market is sinking even when its economy is growing
2026-10-03
Tennessee prison chief to resign after Christa Pike's failed execution, governor says
2026-09-21
Watch: BBC tracks down abusive teacher secretly released early

Who wrote this

Daniel De Simone
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Published Backbench MPs are seeking to roll back a court ruling they say will have "devastating consequences" for victims of crime by preventing them taking legal action against the police, even when there have been grave investigative failings.
🔮 The coroner said he will be issuing a report to the government out of concern about a risk to other people under the terrorism control measures.
🔮 In particular, the judges will decide whether to initiate contempt of court proceedings against certain MI5 officers or MI5 itself.
🔮 Bilyk will be sentenced on 19 October at Stratford Magistrates' Court.
Also by Daniel De Simone
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Backbench CPS Court of Appeal England Wales

Subjects

CPS ORG · 3× Court of Appeal ORG · 3× Met ORG · 3× Kenya GPE · 2× Kololo PERSON · 2× Mitchell PERSON · 2× Backbench ORG · 1× Conservative NORP · 1× England GPE · 1× Wales GPE · 1×

Narrative

The amendment by Mitchell and Phillips, which will be debated on Tuesday, states that, except while acting as witnesses, no immunity applies to actions by police officers in preparation for criminal proceedings, including in cases where there are specified grave failings.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-10
🔮 - Published Backbench MPs are seeking to roll back a court ruling they say will have "devastating consequences" for victims of crime by preventing them taking legal action against the police, even when there have been grave investigative failings.

Claims (26 extracted, 8 hedged)

- Published Backbench MPs are seeking to roll back a court ruling they say will have "devastating consequences" for victims of crime by preventing them taking legal action against the police, even when there have been grave investigative failings. asserted
them → publish → police
The 2025 Court of Appeal judgment, which applies to England and Wales, held that police officers are immune from civil litigation both in their role as witnesses, and for conduct or statements they make when carrying out criminal investigations. asserted
they → apply → investigations
Conservative Andrew Mitchell and Labour's Jess Phillips have submitted an amendment to a bill being debated in Parliament next week seeking to counteract the ruling. asserted
Mitchell → submit → ruling
Separately, the judgment could also be overturned at a Supreme Court appeal this month. uncertain
judgment → overturn → appeal
The MPs are seeking to stop immunity applying, including in cases where police have fabricated evidence, been dishonest or negligent, and where there has been a reckless disclosure of confidential information relating to victims. asserted
police → seek → victims
The ruling came in a case brought by a victim of serious domestic violence who fled her abuser for a secret refuge, but Sussex Police included her new address in a file sent to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) without sufficiently flagging its confidentiality. asserted
Police → come → confidentiality
A CPS lawyer subsequently disclosed her address in court during a bail hearing, thereby revealing it to her abuser. asserted
lawyer → disclose → abuser
As a result, she had to flee again. asserted
she → have → result
The woman said the disclosure of her address had meant the place she was supposed to be safe "no longer felt safe at all" and she was still living with the impact of what happened and that loss of security. asserted
what → say → security
She brought claims against both the police and CPS, arguing their failure placed her in fear for her life, compelled her to leave her home, caused her to suffer loss of earnings, and resulted in her developing a psychiatric injury. uncertain
her → bring → injury
Her claims were initially rejected, reinstated on appeal, then struck out again. uncertain
claims → reject → appeal
The key issue was who could be held legally responsible for what happened, and who would benefit from legal immunity. uncertain
who → hold → immunity
Witnesses and lawyers have what is known as "core immunity" for things they say in court, so that they can speak freely there. asserted
they → have → court
The Court of Appeal ruling further expanded such immunity, holding that it extends to an extremely broad range of police activity, including conduct or statements which are part of an investigation leading to a potential prosecution Most types of legal claim are thus blocked by this immunity, including cases about serious human rights abuses and data breaches, and there are no exemptions for unjustifiable conduct. uncertain
types → expand → conduct
Officers can still be prosecuted in the criminal courts and held accountable by police misconduct processes. asserted
Officers → prosecute → processes
The amendment by Mitchell and Phillips, which will be debated on Tuesday, states that, except while acting as witnesses, no immunity applies to actions by police officers in preparation for criminal proceedings, including in cases where there are specified grave failings. asserted
immunity → debate → cases
Mitchell told BBC News the "police misconduct immunity created by the Court of Appeal's ruling" was extremely concerning and that if "we fail to close this legal loophole there will be devastating consequences for victims". asserted
we → tell → victims
He cited the case of Ali Kololo, saying his life was "ruined by a wrongful conviction secured, in large part, by the Metropolitan Police". asserted
life → cite → Police
Mr Kololo, a Kenyan woodcutter, spent 11 years in jail after being wrongfully convicted of assisting a gang that attacked two British tourists in Kenya in 2011 - one of whom was murdered. asserted
one → spend → whom
He was sentenced to death following a trial in Kenya, at which a senior Met officer who was called to appear as a prosecution witness omitted key evidence. asserted
who → sentence → evidence
Mr Kololo - who is represented by human rights group, Reprieve - is suing the Met, but the force has said it will rely on the legal principle of core immunity in defending the claim, a position likely to be bolstered by the Court of Appeal ruling. uncertain
it → represent → ruling
A Met spokesperson said the force would not comment on the ongoing civil claim, but said its thoughts were with Mr Kololo, the victims of the crime and their families. uncertain
thoughts → say → crime
Kate Ellis, from the Centre for Women's Justice, told the BBC forces may now argue they cannot be "held legally responsible at all for serious mistakes made in a criminal investigation" and it could lead to an "accountability gap" where police forces who fail to investigate rapists, stalkers or domestic abusers "face no consequences for their failings". uncertain
who → tell → failings
A government spokesperson said: "The home secretary and lord chancellor commissioned a review into police accountability following long-standing concerns from policing leaders, officers, victims and their families that the current system is not fit for purpose. asserted
system → say → purpose
Any changes to how the police are treated should be considered alongside the wider findings of this review." asserted
police → treat → review
Sussex Police and the National Police Chiefs Council both declined to comment at this time. asserted
Police → decline → time
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support