The author of this article, a journalist from ProPublica, spent over a year trying to uncover the details of Georgia's lethal injection process after a doctor involved in it stepped away. Due to secrecy laws, including Georgia's Lethal Injection Secrecy Act, the state initially refused to release requested documents, but eventually relented following a lawsuit. The released records show that Georgia has spent over $1.1 million on one contractor since 2020, and an average of over $150,000 per year on lethal injection-related costs over the past decade. Legal experts argue that these costs reflect the difficulties corrections officials face in finding help with carrying out executions due to the problematic nature of the lethal injection process.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-08,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Before I joined ProPublica in 2021, I had spent a year writing about a Georgia prison physician named Carlo Musso, one of the rare doctors who’d openly talked about his role in lethal injections.
asserted
who → join → injections
After he stepped away from that work, I wanted to know who replaced him, so I filed open records requests for documents that would shed light on that.
asserted
that → step → that
The role Musso held is so controversial that more than a dozen states have made it illegal to disclose the names of those involved with lethal injections.
asserted
it → hold → injections
The state has gone to great lengths to hide the details around how it carries out lethal injections.
asserted
it → go → injections
Georgia wouldn’t release records I had requested, claiming that its secrecy law is needed to prevent those helping with its executions from getting harassed by opponents of the death penalty.
asserted
law → release → penalty
I ended up suing the state.
asserted
I → end → state
A few years later, a panel of three judges sided with me, and the state released some of the documents.
asserted
state → side → documents
What I received reveals new details — and revives old questions — about Georgia’s lethal injection process.
asserted
received → receive → process
Among the discoveries: Georgia has made payments of more than $1.1 million since the COVID-19 pandemic for at least one contractor to work with the Corrections Department on its lethal injection process.
asserted
contractor → make → process
During that period, the state carried out just a single execution.
asserted
state → carry → execution
The records also show that Georgia is paying far more for lethal injection-related costs than it did in the past.
asserted
it → show → past
The state’s Corrections Department has spent an average of over $150,000 a year on those costs over the past decade.
asserted
Department → spend → decade
That’s substantially more than what it agreed to pay in the years before 2017, the records show.
asserted
records → ’ → 2017
Secrecy laws like Georgia’s shield the public from awareness of the growing costs of pharmacists concocting drugs and the doctors administering the injections.
asserted
laws → shield → injections
Legal experts say those costs reflect the challenges that corrections officials face in finding help with carrying out lethal injections, which can subject prisoners to torturous levels of pain.
asserted
which → say → pain
“You wouldn’t have to pay this much money if the lethal injection process was an acceptable one,” said Deborah Denno, a Fordham University law professor who is an expert on the death penalty.
asserted
who → have → penalty
“The process itself is so problematic that a lot of money has to be paid.
asserted
lot → have → money
Even after releasing the records, the Georgia Department of Corrections declined to answer my questions about the rising costs and the secrecy around lethal injections.
asserted
Department → release → injections
The state attorney general’s office, which has represented the department in the lawsuit I filed for the records, also declined to comment for this story.
asserted
I → represent → story
State officials previously said that the Lethal Injection Secrecy Act allows the Corrections Department to protect contractors who would otherwise “find themselves at the center of a firestorm of hate mail and midnight callers.”
asserted
themselves → say → mail
They have repeatedly argued that, without the secrecy law in place, Georgia wouldn’t be able to carry out lethal injections.
asserted
Georgia → argue → injections
The secrets of Georgia’s death penalty process could face scrutiny in the coming days.
uncertain
secrets → face → days
After a recent Georgia Supreme Court ruling, which removed a barrier that had paused executions, state officials recently scheduled an execution for Sept. 16, which would be its first in two years.
asserted
which → remove → years
For every new scheduled execution, a new set of questions about the people behind the injections is likely to emerge.
asserted
set → schedule → injections
It wasn’t long after Georgia traded the electric chair for lethal injections in the early 2000s that the state ratcheted up its secrecy.
asserted
state → trade → secrecy
That’s when opponents of the death penalty increased pressure on pharmaceutical companies to stop selling lethal injection drugs to states that could be used for executions.
uncertain
that → ’ → executions
By the end of that decade, the advocates’ campaign started to work.
asserted
campaign → start → decade
States across the country scrambled to find new sources of the drugs.
asserted
States → scramble → drugs
Georgia, for its part, purchased drugs from a wholesaler whose business operated out of the back room of a London driving school.
asserted
business → purchase → school
But that backfired.
asserted
that → backfire → ?
The Drug Enforcement Administration seized the state’s supply of lethal injection drugs in 2011.
asserted
Administration → seize → 2011
Soon after, the European Union — made up of countries that oppose the death penalty — effectively banned companies from selling drugs to states if they were going to use them for executions.
asserted
they → make → executions
Faced with dire lethal injection drug shortages, states turned to a more secret and at times sketchier source of drugs.
asserted
states → face → drugs
As Georgia’s supply was set to expire in 2013, it became one of the first states to place an order with compounding pharmacists, who mix raw ingredients to make custom drugs for patients.
asserted
who → set → patients
Although compounding pharmacies have legitimate uses, they are minimally regulated and their costs can be exorbitant.
asserted
costs → compound → uses
That avenue was ideal for states that couldn’t buy execution drugs from more scrutinized pharmaceutical companies.
asserted
that → buy → companies
But medical experts say that scant oversight of the compounding pharmacies increased the odds of a drug not working as intended.
asserted
drug → say → odds
In a 2013 affidavit filed on behalf of a Georgia prisoner, one pharmacy expert wrote that “highly unpredictable, rapidly evolving and potentially painful and agonizing, not to mention life-threatening, reactions may ensue” as the result of a lethal injection drug made by a compounding pharmacist.
uncertain
reactions → file → pharmacist
Right around that time, Georgia lawmakers passed the Lethal Injection Secrecy Act.
asserted
lawmakers → pass → Act
State prosecutors soon defended it in court.
asserted
prosecutors → defend → court
…and 27 more, not listed.
