Bad medicine: Why New York’s drug fix is the wrong prescription

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Raus, S. (2026, September 7). Bad medicine: Why New York’s drug fix is the wrong prescription. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4712918/albany-pbm-bill-prescription-costs/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-07 · by Sam Raus

Quick Summary

A proposed bill in New York state aims to require pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to reimburse pharmacies at a minimum rate tied to a federal benchmark plus a $10.18 dispensing fee per prescription. The proposal is expected to cost around $576 million and would allegedly be absorbed by PBMs, not passed on to consumers. However, critics argue that this approach will drive up drug prices and cause many integrated pharmacies to leave the state. This bill follows similar legislation in 16 other states, including Arkansas, where a similar law may force CVS to close all its retail pharmacy locations and lay off over 500 workers if implemented.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

New Yorkers struggle with high prescription drug costs, with the average person spending over $100 per month on medications. Lawmakers in Albany, including Governor Kathy Hochul, are considering a bill that would require pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to reimburse pharmacies at a minimum rate tied to a federal benchmark plus a $10.18 dispensing fee. This proposal is expected to cost around $576 million, which lawmakers claim will be absorbed by the industry and not passed on to consumers. However, critics argue that these policies could actually increase prices and undermine patient access to local pharmacies, potentially discouraging new treatments in America.

Written for “New York's Opioid Crisis Response” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 New York's Opioid Crisis Response
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 40 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles mention different cities (Melbourne vs New York) and locations (safe injecting room vs pharmacies), suggesting they are reporting on unrelated events”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
3 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3305 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sam Raus
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Extending the program through 2029 would turn a temporary intervention into a longer-term feature of Medicare.
🔮 Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promises the checks will be delivered without adding to the national deficit, an economic policy Kabuki Theater, possibly paid for with visa fees.
🔮 Instead, they’re pursuing policies that could undermine patient access to local pharmacies and discourage the development of new treatments in America.
Also by Sam Raus
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Albany America CVS New York New Yorkers

Subjects

Albany GPE · 5× New York GPE · 3× New Yorkers NORP · 3× CVS ORG · 2× America GPE · 1× Arkansas GPE · 1× Kathy Hochul PERSON · 1× Medicaid ORG · 1× New Yorkers’ GPE · 1× PBMs ORG · 1×

Narrative

In Arkansas, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R-AR) signed legislation barring companies such as CVS, Cigna, and UnitedHealth from owning both a PBM and a pharmacy — alleging that this vertical integration distorts drug prices and squeezes out smaller, independent pharmacies.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 Instead, they’re pursuing policies that could undermine patient access to local pharmacies and discourage the development of new treatments in America.
2026-09-07 · Washington Examiner
Bad medicine: Why New York’s drug fix is the wrong prescription · assertive framing

Claims (26 extracted, 3 hedged)

New Yorkers know the affordability crisis all too well: Rent is among the highest in the country, taxes take a hefty bite out of paychecks, and even routine household expenses can feel like luxury purchases. asserted
expenses → know → purchases
For many New Yorkers, prescription drugs are another unavoidable expense, with the average person spending over $100 a month on their medications. asserted
person → spend → medications
Yet lawmakers in Albany and beyond aren’t looking for ways to make medicine cheaper. asserted
medicine → look → ways
Instead, they’re pursuing policies that could undermine patient access to local pharmacies and discourage the development of new treatments in America. uncertain
that → pursue → America
Politicians want to micromanage the pharmaceutical supply chain — even if that brings about higher prices. asserted
that → want → prices
Recommended Stories The New York state legislature has sent a bill to Gov. Kathy Hochul’s (D-NY) desk that would require pharmacy benefit managers to reimburse pharmacies at a minimum rate tied to a federal benchmark, plus a $10.18 dispensing fee for each prescription. asserted
that → send → prescription
The proposal is expected to cost roughly $576 million, which lawmakers insist pharmacies and PBMs will absorb rather than pass on to consumers. asserted
pharmacies → expect → consumers
It’s another piece of legislation in a long list of state and federal proposals to scapegoat PBMs for the high cost of various prescription drugs. asserted
It → ’ → drugs
They perform a function that the pharmaceutical market actually needs. asserted
market → perform → that
PBMs aggregate millions of prescriptions and negotiate with drugmakers and pharmacies on behalf of insurers, employers, and patients. asserted
PBMs → aggregate → insurers
Their purchasing power allows them to bargain over prices, build pharmacy networks, and manage prescription benefits at a scale that individual patients and small employers simply cannot match. asserted
patients → purchase → that
Rather than seeking how to leverage this business savvy for greater cost-savings, including in government services such as the Medicaid system, the New York bill would saddle these financial operators with part of the bill for all New Yorkers’ medication orders. asserted
bill → seek → orders
As a result, drug prices will only inflate, and many integrated pharmacies may leave the state. uncertain
pharmacies → inflate → state
In Arkansas, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R-AR) signed legislation barring companies such as CVS, Cigna, and UnitedHealth from owning both a PBM and a pharmacy — alleging that this vertical integration distorts drug prices and squeezes out smaller, independent pharmacies. asserted
integration → sign → pharmacies
While the law is in court, CVS has explicitly stated that the legislation may force them to close all 23 of their retail pharmacy locations in the state and lay off over 500 workers if implemented. uncertain
legislation → state → workers
Sixteen states have already enacted similar mandates to New York, with fees up to $15 per prescription. asserted
states → enact → prescription
Some politicians are even calling for more extreme proposals, such as Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul el Sayed suggesting a total ban on PBMs in his crusade to socialize healthcare. asserted
Sayed → call → healthcare
But the fact that politicians across the country are reaching for the same lever doesn’t make the lever work. asserted
lever → reach → lever
Before Albany joins in the chorus, lawmakers should ask the obvious question: Will patients actually get cheaper prescriptions? asserted
patients → join → prescriptions
Lawmakers should turn their attention to the constraints on the new drug approval process, limited domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing, and other regulations, such as those on transportation, affecting the supply chain. asserted
Lawmakers → turn → chain
If Albany wants cheaper medicine, it should focus on expanding supply and competition rather than dictating how much pharmacies and PBMs must pay each other. asserted
pharmacies → want → other
Pharmacies need to stay open. asserted
Pharmacies → need → ?
Patients need affordable access to medicine. asserted
Patients → need → medicine
PBMs need the freedom to use their purchasing power to negotiate lower prices. asserted
PBMs → need → prices
New Yorkers don’t need Albany to negotiate their prescriptions for them. asserted
Albany → need → them
They need Albany to let the market negotiate a better deal. asserted
market → need → deal
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support