Trump put CNN ‘on notice’ years ago when he called it ‘fake news,’ DOJ tells judge

Read the original at The Independent ↗
The Independent · collected 2026-10-08 · by Alex Woodward

Quick Summary

In court proceedings regarding media access to the White House, DOJ attorney Michael Velchik argued that CNN was aware of potential exclusion due to President Trump's longstanding criticism of it as "fake news." The DOJ claims that three outlets—CNN, MSNOW, and Politico—were barred for national security reasons, though these concerns surfaced in letters after the initial ban. Lawyers for the media argue this is a First Amendment violation, with Theodore Boutrous asserting that Trump acted out of political disagreement rather than national security concerns.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-08, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico are set to appear before U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly in Washington federal court on Thursday to request an extension of a temporary restraining order that blocks their banishment from the White House by President Trump. The outlets argue that the revocation of their press credentials was unlawful retaliation for their coverage, while the Justice Department contends they endangered national security by publishing classified information. Topics like construction of Trump's White House ballroom and turnout at the Republican midterm convention have been cited as threats to national security by the administration. Judge Kelly previously issued a temporary restraining order on September 24, finding that revoking the outlets' passes likely violated their Fifth Amendment rights, though he did not rule on First Amendment claims. The legal battle is now focused on whether the judge will grant a preliminary injunction preventing further White House restrictions while the case proceeds.

Written for “CNN MS NOW Politico vs White House Ban” on 2026-10-08, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but all 5 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 66294: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-08

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
4%
1 of 26 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
58.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

Story

📰 CNN MS NOW Politico vs White House Ban
Politics · 4 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 18% hedged 2 of 11 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the court hearing in Washington federal court where CNN, MS NOW, and Politico are urging a judge to block a White House ban imposed by President Trump.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 4 of 35 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the legal proceedings in court on the same day regarding the White House ban of reporters from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 23 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe attorney statements in the same federal court hearing on October 8, 2026, regarding media outlets' ban from the White House.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 29 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles refer to different incidents involving Trump's interactions with media organizations over time, rather than a single specific occurrence.”

Publisher

The Independent · 1939 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Prison chief to resign after shock botched execution of Christa Pike
2026-09-22
Costa Rican man complained of lack of care for diabetes before his death in ICE custody, family says
2026-09-17
Killer who gunned down famed Elvis impersonator set to be executed tonight
2026-09-04
Pennsylvania confirms second death of child with measles after RFK Jr. told CDC director to delete numbers

Who wrote this

Alex Woodward
35 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The outlets are seeking a preliminary injunction that would prevent the White House from threatening access while the legal challenge plays out.
🔮 “I do not have any idea who else they work for but will, on reflection, ask them and, if there’s a conflict, I will terminate them, immediately!” the president wrote Wednesday.
🔮 Donald Trump’s approval of the execution of Nidal Hasan will mark the military’s first execution by firing squad since Slovik’s killing in 1945, part of a renewed push by the president to restart federal executions — and turn to methods such as firing squads as well as nitrogen gas and electrocution to carry out sentences quicker.
🔮 President Donald Trump will not reimburse the federal government for money already spent on a series of campaign-like ads using taxpayer dollars.
🔮 But his record unpopularity and the chaos of his second term are an albatross that could sink both his remaining years in office and the party’s future in Congress.
🔮 “We will NOT allow violent activist [sic] to lay hands on our law enforcement,” the post said.
🔮 I felt like lions around me,” she said during a May 2025 disciplinary hearing.
🔮 The investigation could be used to bolster the administration’s dubious position that existing laws can sufficiently protect against threats from rapidly developing AI products — despite growing, apocalyptic warnings from developers and routine news of autonomous AI agents gaining unauthorized access to sensitive systems.
🔮 On Monday night, Republican Sen. Mike Lee blocked bipartisan legislation to prevent the Trump administration from demolishing the venue after lawmakers drafted a bill in response to apparent threats that the building could be knocked down if the president isn’t allowed to add his name to it.
🔮 In the middle of Tuesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee, Schmitt held up a poster board containing what he claimed were text messages from Smith’s staff stating that the special counsel was attending an Atlanta Hawks NBA game — and suggested that he colluded with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to prosecute the president and his allies.
Also by Alex Woodward
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 35 articles by Alex Woodward →

Topics

CNN Independent The White House Press Office U.S. the White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 7× the White House ORG · 5× CNN ORG · 3× Kelly PERSON · 2× Politico ORG · 2× The White House Press Office ORG · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× Velchik PERSON · 2× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Independent NORP · 1×

Narrative

In an interview with TIME published last week, Trump denied that he was violating the court order while White House communications director Steven Cheung argued that restoring press passes is “different than allowing the pool into the events in the Oval Office or on Air Force One.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 The outlets are seeking a preliminary injunction that would prevent the White House from threatening access while the legal challenge plays out.

Claims (26 extracted, 1 hedged)

Donald Trump’s administration argues that three media outlets that were blocked from the White House had plenty of notice of their imminent removal before the president announced he was unilaterally “banning” them. asserted
he → argue → them
Department of Justice attorney Michael Velchik told a federal judge on Thursday that CNN, one of three outlets targeted by the president along with MSNOW and Politico, “has been on notice for years.” asserted
CNN → tell → years
Trump has long led a crusade against CNN as a bastion of “fake news,” a term that should have served as a signal to the network to change its approach, Velchik suggested. uncertain
Velchik → lead → approach
“Trump doesn’t mind negative press stories if he deserves them,” he said. asserted
he → mind → them
Lawyers for the outlets are asking U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly to restore their access to the White House and indefinitely block the Trump administration from stripping their credentials while a legal battle continues. asserted
battle → ask → credentials
The Justice Department has argued that the outlets were banned for national security reasons, though the president has not made any such argument. asserted
president → argue → argument
The White House Press Office only raised those concerns in letters to the outlets — after they filed a lawsuit to reverse the ban. asserted
they → raise → ban
Velchik argued that Trump has the right to target specific reporters and outlets at his “discretion.” asserted
Trump → argue → discretion
“It is within the discretion of the president to say, ‘I am concerned with a specific reporter,’” he said. asserted
he → say → reporter
Theodore Boutrous, who is representing the outlets, told Kelly on Thursday that the administration mounted a “sham process” that amounts to an “egregious” infringement of the First Amendment and due process rights. asserted
that → represent → Amendment
The outlets are seeking a preliminary injunction that would prevent the White House from threatening access while the legal challenge plays out. asserted
challenge → seek → access
Trump — as “the decisionmaker” behind the ban — “made clear he was making a decision to ban [the outlets] in order to punish speech he didn't like because of its viewpoint,” Boutrous said. asserted
Boutrous → make → viewpoint
“I doubt he even knows about these letters,” he said. asserted
he → doubt → letters
In letters to the outlets on September 22, several days after the initial ban, the White House Press Office accused the outlets of “trafficking in verifiable falsehoods about national security” and “publishing sensitive or classified information.” asserted
Office → accuse → information
Each letter cited several offending stories, some of which were several months or more than a year old, that have “threatened national security and/or spread falsehoods.” asserted
that → cite → falsehoods
They included stories in which administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, were the sources. asserted
officials → include → Vance
The stories included reporting on the U.S. military, including depleting munitions during the Iran war, the Trump administration's responsibility for a missile strike on an Iranian girls’ school, and reduced troop presence in the Pacific and Europe. asserted
stories → include → Pacific
At least two stories deal with Trump’s plans for a ballroom and military complex at the site of the now-demolished East Wing of the White House — information that the president and administration officials have detailed themselves in court filings. asserted
president → deal → filings
Judge Kelly has already issued a temporary restraining order that rejected the government’s arguments that the president’s ban was motivated by national security concerns. asserted
ban → issue → concerns
His order in the early morning hours of September 24 required the White House to immediately reinstate the outlets’ credentials and restore their access to the White House grounds, but it did not explicitly address their participation in pool coverage. asserted
it → require → coverage
Impacted reporters were eventually allowed inside White House grounds around noon that day, but on September 25, CNN learned that it would not be permitted to travel aboard Air Force One as the designated television network pooler for the president’s trip to Knoxville, Tennessee. asserted
it → allow → Knoxville
The White House also blocked Politico from Air Force One on Monday. asserted
House → block → Monday
In an interview with TIME published last week, Trump denied that he was violating the court order while White House communications director Steven Cheung argued that restoring press passes is “different than allowing the pool into the events in the Oval Office or on Air Force One.” asserted
restoring → publish → One
The White House told The Independent that traveling on Air Force One is a “privilege not a right” and defended Trump as “the most accessible President in American history” who “will continue to grant an unprecedented level of access to the press.” asserted
who → tell → press
Judge Kelly expects to issue a decision in the coming days. asserted
Kelly → expect → days
His temporary restraining order is set to expire at midnight on Monday. asserted
order → set → Monday
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support