Group of refs, officials call explanation of controversial Michigan ending ‘pile of garbage’: College football analyst

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Arnold, C. (2026, September 7). Group of refs, officials call explanation of controversial Michigan ending ‘pile of garbage’: College football analyst. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/06/sports/group-of-refs-officials-question-controversial-michigan-ending-josh-pate/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-07 · by Christian Arnold

Quick Summary

College football analyst Josh Pate has criticized the Big Ten's explanation of a disputed call that allowed Michigan to win against Western Michigan with a second Hail Mary attempt. According to Pate, several officials and referees have privately expressed their skepticism about the explanation, calling it "a pile of garbage" from the league office. The controversy surrounds a stray one second added back to the clock in the fourth quarter. Big Ten officials have defended the decision by releasing video of their internal review process.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Western Michigan Broncos were on the verge of pulling off a massive upset against the Michigan Wolverines, but a clock controversy changed the course of the game. The Broncos thought they had secured a historic win when Bryce Underwood's Hail Mary attempt sailed out of bounds with zero seconds left on the clock. However, officials reviewed the play and determined that there was still one second remaining, allowing Michigan another chance to score.

In the end, Underwood connected with J.J. Buchanan for a 47-yard touchdown pass, lifting Michigan to a 13-12 win over Western Michigan. The decision to put one second back on the clock has been widely criticized, with many calling it a "cover-your-ass" move by the Big Ten league office.

The incident sparked controversy and debate among fans, officials, and analysts, with some questioning whether Michigan would have been given another chance to score if they had missed the second Hail Mary attempt. The game was marked by a series of bizarre events, including Michigan fans storming the field in celebration after the win.

Written for “Michigan-Western Michigan Controversy” on 2026-10-23, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Michigan-Western Michigan Controversy
Sports · 6 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 36 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the same game between Michigan and Western Michigan, with a clock controversy allowing Michigan a second Hail Mary chance to win”
Both report
The two articles describe the same game between Michigan and Western Michigan, with a clock controversy allowing Michigan a second Hail Mary chance to win.
This one adds
The Fox News article provides more details about the reason for the controversy, stating that Western Michigan started their jump from an established out-of-bounds position, which stopped the clock on contact. The article also quotes a conference statement explaining this rule.
The other adds
The New York Post article includes statements from college football analysts and officials who are critical of the Big Ten league office's handling of the situation, calling it "a pile of garbage" and "beyond the pale". This article does not provide additional details about the clock controversy itself, but rather focuses on the reaction to the decision.
Framing
The Fox News article presents a more neutral tone, simply reporting the facts of the case. The New York Post article takes a stronger stance, with analysts and officials expressing outrage and disappointment at the league office's handling of the situation.
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 14 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles report on a specific game between Michigan and Western Michigan, with a focus on a controversial ending where a Hail Mary pass was reviewed to put one second back on the clock.”
Both report
Both articles report on the controversial ending of a game between Michigan and Western Michigan, where a Hail Mary pass was reviewed to put one second back on the clock.
This one adds
The Guardian article reports that the final score was 13-12 in favor of Michigan, with a 47-yard touchdown pass from Bryce Underwood to JJ Buchanan. This detail is not present in the New York Post article.
The other adds
The New York Post article quotes a college football analyst who describes the Big Ten league office's explanation as a "pile of garbage", and suggests that they are trying to cover up their mistake. This criticism is not present in the Guardian article.
Framing
While both articles report on the controversy surrounding the game ending, the Guardian article frames it more neutrally, simply reporting on the events without explicit criticism or opinion. The New York Post article, on the other hand, has a more sensational tone and explicitly criticizes the Big Ten league office's handling of the situation.
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 13 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the same game, between Michigan and Western Michigan, with a focus on the controversial ending where officials put one second back on the clock allowing Michigan to attempt a Hail Mary.”
Both report
The articles describe the same game between Michigan and Western Michigan, with a focus on the controversial ending where officials added one second back to the clock, allowing Michigan to attempt a Hail Mary. Both articles mention that Michigan fans rushed the field after the game, which ended in a Michigan victory. However, both articles approach this event from different angles.
This one adds
This article provides more context about the reaction of the Michigan fanbase on social media, implying that they were criticized for rushing the field after scoring only 13 points against Western Michigan. The author also suggests that the controversy surrounding the ending overshadowed the actual play itself.
The other adds
This article includes a quote from a college football analyst who claims to have spoken with officials and referees, who describe the explanation of the controversial ending as "a pile of garbage" and "beyond the pale". The analyst's statement implies that there is widespread criticism of the Big Ten league office's handling of the situation.
Framing
While both articles present a narrative around the controversy surrounding the game's ending, this article frames it more as a consequence of the fanbase's reaction, whereas the other article focuses on the alleged incompetence and dishonesty of the Big Ten league office. The first article uses more assertive language to describe the events, while the second article includes a more forceful quote that implies a stronger tone of outrage and criticism.
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 41 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the controversy surrounding a single game between Michigan and Western Michigan on the same day, with Article A describing the aftermath and Article B discussing the referees' explanation of the game's ending.”
Both report
The articles share a common event, describing the controversy surrounding a game between Michigan and Western Michigan on the same day.
This one adds
Article A provides more information about the context of the controversy, including a statement from the Mid-American Conference Commissioner Dr. Jon Steinbrecher, which suggests that there was some confusion about the replay review and the placement of time back on the clock.
The other adds
Article B includes quotes from referees and officials who are critical of the Big Ten league office's explanation for the game's ending, describing it as a "pile of garbage" and suggesting that the handling of the situation was egregious. This article also includes comments from a college football analyst, Pate, who expresses his own frustration with the situation.
Framing
While both articles describe the controversy surrounding the game's ending, Article A frames it more neutrally, providing background information on the issue and quotes from the Mid-American Conference Commissioner. In contrast, Article B is more sensational in its language, using words like "garbage" and "horrifically bad" to describe the Big Ten league office's handling of the situation.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 1% hedged 1 of 80 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the same game between Michigan and Western Michigan, with a focus on the controversial decision to put one second back on the clock in the fourth quarter.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 12 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 13037 article(s) · 33 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 33 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Christian Arnold
136 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “What you saw at the end of the game, when we have to go all in in two counterattacks and make sure they don’t get a second goal, Unfortunately, that has happened more often to us than we would like to.”
🔮 “His years leading the Bearcats represent an unforgettable chapter in his life, filled with cherished relationships, remarkable accomplishments, and memories that will always hold a special place in his heart.
🔮 The Eagles’ handling of the situation has drawn plenty of questions since it was revealed that Hurts will miss the remainder of the season and whether Philadelphia allowed Hurts to play in London while injured.
🔮 If you can’t get a ring yourself, you might as well spoil the party.
🔮 In one message, the person used a homophobic slur, wishing that Miller would be raped, before telling Wilson that “i am going to rape, beat and kill ur family.”
🔮 The new agreement will expand the two-time major winner’s connection to the popular driving range.
🔮 In another social media post from July, Justin Wu made a video explaining how his son ended up with the name Jalen, which was given to him when he was born during the playoff run in May.
🔮 When asked by Lauren Shehadi what he would have said in July if he was told he’d be ALCS MVP, Peralta responded that he’d say, “You’re crazy.”
🔮 Had the two sides not agreed to a deal by Monday’s deadline to sign extensions for players from the 2023 NBA Draft class, the soon-to-be 24-year-old would have played this season on a team option and then been a restricted free agent going into next offseason.
🔮 The United States will next face Kenya in a Group Stage match on Thursday.
Also by Christian Arnold
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 136 articles by Christian Arnold →

Topics

Big Ten Michigan NBC Western Michigan the Big Ten

Subjects

the Big Ten ORG · 4× Big Ten ORG · 2× Michigan GPE · 2× NBC ORG · 2× Pate PERSON · 2× Western Michigan ORG · 2× Josh Pate PERSON · 1× Josh Pate’s PERSON · 1× Mid-American Conference ORG · 1× Wolverines ORG · 1×

Narrative

“I have been on the phone with several officials and several referees this morning who wanted to make sure that they articulated how much of a [cover your ass] move this is, how big of a pile of garbage that is from the Big Ten league office, and how egregious, like beyond the pale, horrifically bad the machinations of the way that was handled last night were.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 “I would love for someone in the league office to look me in the eye and tell me if Western Michigan was at midfield heaving a prayer up and that exact same set of circumstances were to have played out, that this is the way it would have gone down,” Pate said during his show.

Claims (12 extracted, 0 hedged)

Josh Pate had some strong words for the Big Ten after the controversial decision during the Michigan-Western Michigan game that led to the Wolverines pulling off a win after nearly getting upset by the Mid-American Conference foe. asserted
Wolverines → have → foe
The decision to put one second back on the clock in the fourth quarter allowed Michigan a second Hail Mary chance to win the game, which they did. asserted
they → put → which
Pate said during “Josh Pate’s College Football Show” that he’s heard from “several officials and several referees,” who were not buying the explanation given. asserted
who → say → explanation
“I would love for someone in the league office to look me in the eye and tell me if Western Michigan was at midfield heaving a prayer up and that exact same set of circumstances were to have played out, that this is the way it would have gone down,” Pate said during his show. asserted
Pate → love → show
“I have been on the phone with several officials and several referees this morning who wanted to make sure that they articulated how much of a [cover your ass] move this is, how big of a pile of garbage that is from the Big Ten league office, and how egregious, like beyond the pale, horrifically bad the machinations of the way that was handled last night were. asserted
that → want → way
The stray one second that officials put back on the clock has been the talk of college football. asserted
officials → put → football
Many have questioned where it came from, with NBC, which was carrying the broadcast, even having its own rules analyst questioning it. asserted
analyst → question → it
Western Michigan and the MAC have accepted the ruling following a statement by the Big Ten and the conference releasing video of the process it went through internally to review the play. asserted
it → accept → play
Still, NBC addressed the controversy as well on Sunday night during halftime of the Apple Cup between Washington and Washington State, with John Fanta being the one to deliver it. asserted
Fanta → address → it
“Now, the official time of the game is kept by the Big Ten,” Fanta said on air. asserted
Fanta → keep → air
After the game last night, the Big Ten released a statement and raw video from its replay process that showed how and why the decision was made. asserted
decision → release → process
” While all parties involved seemed keen to move past the controversy, it doesn’t seem like the college football world is ready yet to end the debate over what happened on Saturday night in Ann Arbor. asserted
what → involve → Arbor
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support