Carlos Alcaraz’s layoff no problem as he steamrolls American star into US Open quarterfinals

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Walker, M. (2026, September 7). Carlos Alcaraz’s layoff no problem as he steamrolls American star into US Open quarterfinals. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/06/sports/carlos-alcarazs-layoff-no-problem-as-he-cruises-into-us-open-quarterfinals/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-07 · by Mollie Walker

Quick Summary

Carlos Alcaraz has advanced to the quarterfinals of the US Open, beating American Tommy Paul 6-4, 6-3, 6-4 in under 2 ½ hours on Sunday afternoon. Alcaraz is seeking to become the first men's singles player to repeat as U.S. Open champion since 2004. Despite having his longest professional layoff due to a wrist injury before the tournament, Alcaraz dominated Paul, winning 93% of his service games and 76% of deep returns against him. This marks the sixth consecutive win for Alcaraz over Paul, who was competing in the fourth round of the U.S. Open for just the third time.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Tommy Paul of the US had a chance to get revenge against Carlos Alcaraz in their quarterfinal match at the US Open. However, Alcaraz, who has been out for four months with a wrist injury, dominated Paul in straight sets (6-4, 6-3, 6-4). This victory extends Alcaraz's winning streak to 18 and keeps him on track for back-to-back titles at the US Open. Alcaraz also becomes one win away from improving his record against American players at Grand Slams to 13-0. Aryna Sabalenka, the top-ranked player, also advanced to the quarterfinals by defeating Taylor Townsend in straight sets (6-4, 6-3).

Written for “US Open Tennis Quarterfinals” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 19 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Open Tennis Quarterfinals
Sports · 20 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the same tennis match between Carlos Alcaraz and Tommy Paul at the US Open, with similar details about the score and outcome.”
Both report
The articles both describe the same tennis match between Carlos Alcaraz and Tommy Paul at the US Open, with similar details about the score and outcome.
This one adds
The Zach Braziller article includes a quote from Tommy Paul about his mindset in the match, where he says that he tries to "hang on to my serve" as a way of staying in the game. This article also frames the match as a potential opportunity for revenge for Paul.
The other adds
The Mollie Walker article includes more detail about Carlos Alcaraz's recent layoff due to a wrist injury and how it has not seemed to affect his performance at the US Open. It also makes a prediction that Alcaraz is on track to become the first men's singles player to repeat in Flushing in nearly two decades.
Framing
The articles have different focuses, with the Zach Braziller article emphasizing Paul's potential for revenge and the Mollie Walker article focusing on Alcaraz's impressive performance despite his layoff. The Walker article is more assertive in its predictions about Alcaraz's chances of repeating as champion, while the Braziller article presents a more nuanced view of Paul's prospects.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 19 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on Carlos Alcaraz's match against Tommy Paul in the US Open, with identical scores (6-4, 6-3, 6-4) and a similar description of the event.”
Both report
The articles report on the same event, Carlos Alcaraz's match against Tommy Paul in the US Open, with identical scores (6-4, 6-3, 6-4) and a similar description of the event. Both authors mention that Alcaraz is moving closer to improving his win-loss record against American players at the Grand Slams.
This one adds
The Reuters article from Al Jazeera provides more objective information on the match, stating that "second seed Alcaraz continued to steal the show with his audacious play". The author also mentions the crowd's desire for a home winner. In contrast, the New York Post article takes a more assertive tone and emphasizes Alcaraz's potential for repeating as champion.
The other adds
The New York Post article, written by Mollie Walker, provides more details on Alcaraz's layoff due to a wrist injury and how it did not affect his performance in the match. The author also mentions that there is concern about Alcaraz's ability to repeat as champion, which is not mentioned in the Reuters article.
Framing
The two articles have different tones: the Reuters article from Al Jazeera is more neutral and objective, while the New York Post article takes a more assertive tone and emphasizes Alcaraz's potential for repeating as champion. The New York Post article also seems to be focusing on the story of Alcaraz's comeback and his chances of becoming the first men's singles player to repeat in Flushing in nearly two decades.
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 21 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles report on Carlos Alcaraz's win against Tommy Paul in the US Open fourth round, with identical score and outcome (6-4, 6-3, 6-4)”
Both report
Both articles cover Carlos Alcaraz's win against Tommy Paul in the US Open fourth round, with identical score and outcome (6-4, 6-3, 6-4).
This one adds
The first article mentions that Alcaraz moved to the brink of improving his win-loss record against American players at the grand slams to 13-0. It also notes that he will face either Ben Shelton or Stefanos Tsitsipas in the quarters.
The other adds
The second article highlights Alcaraz's ability to steamroll through opponents despite a recent layoff due to a wrist injury. It also mentions his potential to become the first men's singles player to repeat as US Open champion in nearly two decades, and includes a quote from an uncertain source predicting that Alcaraz could have done better but still won.
Framing
The first article presents a more assertive tone, stating that Alcaraz is "back to 'full power'" and implying a strong performance. The second article also uses assertive language, calling Alcaraz's win a "steamroll" and predicting his potential for success in the tournament. However, the second article does include one uncertain claim (4.2% density), whereas the first article makes no uncertain claims.
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 30 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles report on the US Open quarter-final match between Carlos Alcaraz and Tommy Paul, with similar scores and outcomes.”
Both report
The articles report on the same event, the US Open quarter-final match between Carlos Alcaraz and Tommy Paul, with similar scores and outcomes. Both articles describe Alcaraz's performance as impressive, with The Guardian calling it a "statement performance" and the New York Post saying he "steamrolls" his opponent.
This one adds
The Guardian article provides more narrative spread, carrying multiple related narratives, while the New York Post article focuses on a single assertive statement. The Guardian also highlights Alcaraz's ability to "rise to the occasion" in the biggest challenge of his comeback so far.
The other adds
The New York Post article adds context to Alcaraz's layoff due to a wrist injury and how it may have affected his performance, as well as speculating on his chances of repeating as champion. This is not mentioned in The Guardian article.
Framing
While both articles are assertive, the tone of the two articles differs. The New York Post article focuses more on Alcaraz's potential for success and his ability to overcome a layoff, whereas The Guardian article emphasizes his impressive performance in the match itself.
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 39 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles describe Carlos Alcaraz's victory over Tommy Paul in the US Open Round of 16, with similar scores and outcomes.”
Both report
The two articles describe Carlos Alcaraz's victory over Tommy Paul in the US Open Round of 16, with similar scores and outcomes. They both mention Alcaraz's layoff due to a right wrist injury and his ability to play like himself again. Both articles also mention that Alcaraz is moving on to the quarterfinals.
This one adds
The first article mentions that Alcaraz set up match point in the third set with a perfectly placed shot, which left actor Matthew McConaughey and others in the crowd in disbelief. This article also includes a quote from Alcaraz about not coming back if he couldn't play like himself again.
The other adds
The second article mentions that there was concern over Alcaraz's ability to perform well after his longest professional layoff due to injury, but he looks primed to win and earn a shot at repeating as champion. This article also includes a quote from Alcaraz about things he could have done better in the match.
Framing
The first article has a more assertive tone, with phrases like "set up match point by hitting a shot so perfectly" that convey confidence in Alcaraz's abilities. The second article is also assertive, but its framing emphasizes Alcaraz's resilience and ability to overcome his layoff.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 18 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles report on Carlos Alcaraz's win over Tommy Paul in the Round of 16 at the US Open, on the same date and day”
Both report
Both articles are about Carlos Alcaraz's win over Tommy Paul in the Round of 16 at the US Open on the same date and day, indicating that they are covering the same event.
This one adds
The first article focuses on a humorous moment where Alcaraz seemed unaware of his next opponent, while the second article does not mention this incident. Instead, it highlights Alcaraz's ability to perform well despite his recent layoff due to a wrist injury.
The other adds
The second article provides more information about Alcaraz's layoff and its potential impact on his performance, as well as his goal of becoming the first men's singles player to repeat in Flushing in just under two decades. Additionally, it includes a quote from Alcaraz reflecting on his game.
Framing
Both articles present Alcaraz's win as a significant achievement, but the second article frames it within the context of his recent layoff and its potential implications for his career, while the first article focuses more on the lighthearted moment where he seemed unaware of his next opponent.
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 33 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes Alcaraz's win over Tommy Paul, while Article B describes Alcaraz's loss to Ben Shelton in a later match”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 27 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A reports on Alcaraz defeating Tommy Paul to reach the quarterfinals, while Article B reports on Alcaraz being defeated by Ben Shelton in a later match”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 1 of 11 📰 publisher trust 67
“The two articles report on different outcomes of matches involving Carlos Alcaraz and describe distinct times and opponents”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 1 of 13 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A reports on Alcaraz going shirtless after a third-round win, while Article B describes his victory in the Round of 16 against Tommy Paul”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
20
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 12769 article(s) · 33 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 33 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mollie Walker
41 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 tRY IT NOWAgainst the clubs projected to finish near the bottom of the standings — such as the Red Wings, Canucks and Ducks — the Rangers have won by a combined margin of 13-4.
🔮 “I think the biggest thing in-zone — and this is a discussion we’ve had with our group — is our willingness to create off the shot more,” Sullivan said.
🔮 “Obviously, we knew what he could bring defensively, but he’s got that offensive game to him.
🔮 The silver lining to Igor Shesterkin’s impending placement on season-ending long-term injury reserve is the sizable cap relief the Rangers will get in return — and the possibilities are endless.
🔮 Sullivan has indicated that dressing Chmelar or Rempe would be a game-to-game decision, but the former had gotten a stretch of games amid the Rangers’ 5-1 run after their shutout loss in Boston.
🔮 After some heavy play along the walls to maintain possession with his linemates, Will Cuylle registered his third goal of the season as the lone goal scorer in the second period.
2026-10-14 · assertive framing · Rangers roll past Lightning to remain undefeated at MSG
🔮 I think Will Cuylle’s an emerging young guy that’s starting to take on more of a leadership role for us.
🔮 And after hearing the most devastating injury news possible about their star goalie Igor Shesterkin, who will miss the remainder of the season with a knee injury, the 2026-27 Rangers took a 6-2 win over a struggling Canucks team despite giving up an equalizing shorthanded goal late in the second period. “This is a situation I feel like not a lot needs to be said,” captain J.T. Miller said Sunday morning after participating in an optional skate.
🔮 We like his potential and where it could go.
🔮 The Blueshirts would lose more than just the best goaltender in the NHL, who was off to an electric start to the season.
Also by Mollie Walker
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 41 articles by Mollie Walker →

Topics

American Flushing Spaniard U.S. Open the Round of 16

Subjects

Alcaraz PERSON · 9× Paul PERSON · 6× Flushing GPE · 2× Tommy Paul PERSON · 2× Alexander Bublik PERSON · 1× American NORP · 1× Ben Shelton PERSON · 1× Carlos Alcaraz PERSON · 1× Spaniard NORP · 1× Stefanos Tsitsipas PERSON · 1×

Narrative

While there was some concern over the possibility, considering Alcaraz came to Flushing on the heels of his longest professional layoff due to a wrist injury, the speedy Spaniard looks primed to earn a shot at becoming the first men’s singles player to repeat in Flushing in just under two decades.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 “I think there are a lot of things I could have done better, but I could have done a lot of things better and still lost that match.”

Claims (24 extracted, 1 hedged)

Carlos Alcaraz is one step closer to defending his U.S. Open title. asserted
Alcaraz → defend → title
While there was some concern over the possibility, considering Alcaraz came to Flushing on the heels of his longest professional layoff due to a wrist injury, the speedy Spaniard looks primed to earn a shot at becoming the first men’s singles player to repeat in Flushing in just under two decades. asserted
Spaniard → be → decades
Steamrolling No. 20-seeded American Tommy Paul 6-4, 6-3, 6-4 in the Round of 16 in less than 2 ½ hours Sunday afternoon, Alcaraz continues to ramp up his game at the right time. asserted
Alcaraz → steamroll → time
“He was playing on a different level than me,” Paul said. asserted
Paul → play → me
“I think there are a lot of things I could have done better, but I could have done a lot of things better and still lost that match.” uncertain
I → think → match
Alcaraz will now face the winner of Ben Shelton and Stefanos Tsitsipas, who squared off late Sunday on Ashe. asserted
who → face → Ashe
Paul was competing in the fourth round of the U.S. Open for just the third time, after the 29-year-old went at least four sets in all three of his previous wins. asserted
old → compete → wins
That included his upset victory over the No. 15-seeded Alexander Bublik in a five-setter in Round 3 earlier this week. asserted
That → include → Round
Still, Alcaraz — who has dropped just one set since his return — made it look like a practice match at times against a top 20 player on the tour. asserted
it → drop → tour
“I’m really happy to see where my level is right now,” Alcaraz said. asserted
Alcaraz → ’m → ?
“Beating Tommy Paul is always great feedback to see where you are, and just really happy about everything I’ve done today. asserted
I → beat → everything
I think I returned pretty well. asserted
I → think → ?
I saw really, really well the game today, what I had to do in every moment. asserted
I → see → moment
This was always going to be a long shot for Paul, who has now lost six in a row to Alcaraz, as well as seven of their nine total meetings. asserted
who → go → meetings
Paul hasn’t beaten Alcaraz since the 2023 ATP Masters 1000 Canada, when the latter was just 20 years old. asserted
latter → beat → Canada
During his on-court interview, Alcaraz said he was able to just play his game and be aggressive. asserted
he → say → game
He ultimately won 93 percent of his service games, dropping just one for the whole match. asserted
He → win → match
The way he was returning the ball, however, was just as sharp. asserted
he → return → ball
Alcaraz simply dominated from the baseline and won 76 percent of deep returns against Paul. asserted
Alcaraz → dominate → Paul
“On first serve, he did a good job on most every ball he had his strings on, he put it back in the court and deep,” Paul said. asserted
Paul → do → court
“And then on second serves, I mean, he was kind of mixing up his stance a little bit. asserted
he → mean → stance
Starting early in the match, he was closer to the baseline trying to take my second serve early, and then he backed up into the first and most of the second serves backed up, took all my second serves from deep. “Basically, after he got the break in the third, he went back up again. asserted
he → start → third
I think he was trying to apply extra pressure by coming in. asserted
he → think → pressure
I think he definitely wanted to make points quick and kind of rush me.” asserted
points → think → me
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support