India exposes Pakistan’s doublespeak at UN, says world has not forgotten 9/11, 26/11, Pahalgam attacks

Read the original at The Hindu ↗
The Hindu · collected 2026-10-08 · by PTI

Quick Summary

India exercised its Right of Reply at the UN General Assembly on October 7, 2026, to criticize Pakistan’s stance on terrorism. India accused Pakistan of supporting terror groups like Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and highlighted specific attacks such as 9/11, 26/11, and the Pahalgam attack. First Secretary Raghoo Puri from India's UN mission pointed out that Pakistan’s recent reward offer for JeM chief Masood Azhar is an attempt to deflect attention from its state sponsorship of terrorism.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-08, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 7, 2026, India addressed the Sixth Committee of the UN General Assembly to expose Pakistan's stance on terrorism. First Secretary Raghoo Puri from India’s Permanent Mission at the UN criticized Pakistan for announcing rewards for Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) chief Masood Azahar while presenting itself as an opponent of terror. Puri emphasized that the international community has not forgotten major terrorist attacks like 9/11, 26/11, and the attack in Pahalgam. He highlighted Pakistan’s support for terrorism through financing, facilitating, training, sheltering, or supporting terrorists from its territory, questioning how states deal with such actions. India stressed that defeating terrorism requires action against perpetrators rather than just declarations.

Written for “India Condemns Pakistan At Un” on 2026-10-08, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 64942 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-08

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
9%
3 of 34 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
96.3
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

Story

📰 India Condemns Pakistan At Un
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 23 📰 publisher trust 71
“The articles discuss different parts of a broader series of interactions at the UN, with Article A focusing on India's response during the Sixth Committee session and Article B covering Pakistan's interior minister meeting with the UN Secretary General.”
IWT’s future different event · 20%
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 16% hedged 3 of 19 📰 publisher trust 71
“Article A discusses India's unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty in relation to a previous incident (Pahalgam episode), while Article B focuses on India's response to Pakistan at the UN regarding terrorism and support for terrorist groups, mentioning Pahalgam attacks but not the same specific event.”

Publisher

The Hindu · 2 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article, beyond the feed's “PTI”.

Topics

Afghanistan India Islamabad Pakistan Pakistani

Subjects

Pakistan GPE · 17× India GPE · 6× Puri PERSON · 5× Azhar PERSON · 4× Islamabad GPE · 4× Afghanistan GPE · 3× Pakistani NORP · 3× FATF ORG · 2× JeM ORG · 2× Taliban ORG · 2×

Narrative

“Pakistan speaks of combating terrorism while seeking to obscure the very question that this committee must confront — What happens when terrorists are financed, facilitated, trained, sheltered, or supported from the territory of a State?,” First Secretary in the Permanent Mission of India to the UN Raghoo Puri said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 In May last year, India had launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the dastardly April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir perpetrated by The Resistance Front, a proxy of Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, in which 26 civilians, mostly tourists were killed.

Claims (34 extracted, 3 hedged)

Exposing Pakistan’s doublespeak on terrorism at the UN, India has called out Islamabad’s efforts to gloss over its state support for terror by announcing rewards for Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) chief Masood Azahar, underlining that the world has not forgotten 9/11, 26/11 and Pahalgam attacks. asserted
world → expose → attacks
India on Wednesday (October 7, 2026) exercised its Right of Reply in response to the Pakistan representative’s statement in the Sixth Committee of the UN General Assembly on the Agenda Item: Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism. asserted
India → exercise → Terrorism
“Pakistan speaks of combating terrorism while seeking to obscure the very question that this committee must confront — What happens when terrorists are financed, facilitated, trained, sheltered, or supported from the territory of a State?,” First Secretary in the Permanent Mission of India to the UN Raghoo Puri said. asserted
Puri → speak → UN
He said India has been consistent on this question, underscoring that terrorism cannot be defeated by declarations and instead requires action against its perpetrators, organisers, financiers, and sponsors. asserted
terrorism → say → perpetrators
“For years, Pakistan has presented itself as a frontline State in combating terrorism and as a victim while masking the fact that the Frankensteins the Pakistani state has created and lost control over have moved from wreaking havoc in neighbouring countries to doing the same in Pakistan,” Mr. Puri said. asserted
Puri → present → Pakistan
Calling out Pakistan’s doublespeak on terrorism, Mr. Puri said the country “glosses over its state support for terrorism by announcing enhanced rewards for apprehending UN-listed head of Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist and mastermind of several attacks against my country, Masood Azhar.” asserted
country → call → country
He said the world is aware of Pakistan's financial support to terrorism. asserted
world → say → terrorism
“Yet, we also remember that just a few months ago, Pakistani representatives used this forum to call the Jaish-e-Mohammed a defunct organisation. asserted
representatives → remember → Mohammed
The world has seen the script play earlier, and we are clear-eyed that this time also it is going to be no different,” he said. asserted
he → see → ?
Mr. Puri said that when the media can reach Azhar and get confirmation from him about the success of Operation Sindoor, "surely the Pakistani state knows his whereabouts”. asserted
state → say → whereabouts
In May last year, India had launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the dastardly April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir perpetrated by The Resistance Front, a proxy of Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, in which 26 civilians, mostly tourists were killed. uncertain
civilians → launch → which
Earlier this month, India had dismissed as “gimmicks” Pakistan’s fresh announcement of a bounty of seven million rupees on Azhar, demanding that Islamabad take “concrete action” to combat terrorism. asserted
Islamabad → dismiss → terrorism
India has for years accused Pakistan of sheltering Azhar, while Pakistan has maintained that he fled to Afghanistan — a claim rejected by Afghanistan’s Taliban government. uncertain
he → accuse → government
For the last few years, Islamabad has claimed that the JeM founder has been operating from Afghanistan. asserted
founder → claim → Afghanistan
However, the Taliban regime dismissed Pakistan’s repeated claims, with a senior Afghan Foreign Ministry official saying he is not in the country. uncertain
he → dismiss → country
Islamabad’s fresh announcement on the reward for information on Azhar came as it faces pressure from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to crack down on terror groups and their leadership. asserted
it → come → groups
The Paris-based global watchdog is set to review Pakistan’s anti-terrorism efforts at its upcoming plenary. asserted
watchdog → base → plenary
Pakistan was placed under the FATF grey list between 2018 and 2022 for its systemic deficiencies in anti-money laundering and its failure to counter-terror financing. asserted
Pakistan → place → financing
Mr. Puri also recalled a recent statement by Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, daughter of former Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who had said, “The unfortunate thing is that the threat [Punjab] faces comes less from my neighbouring countries and more from my neighbouring provinces.” asserted
Punjab → recall → provinces
Exposing this “dark secret”, Mr. Puri said, “You cannot run with the hares and hunt with the hounds. asserted
You → expose → hounds
Reality never works like that.” asserted
Reality → work → that
“When terrorist groups are allowed to operate under state political power, international commitments become meaningless and when perpetrators are provided safe havens, the victims of terrorism are denied justice,” he said. asserted
he → allow → justice
“The world has not forgotten 9/11 and where its perpetrators, including Osama bin Laden, were caught. asserted
perpetrators → forget → Laden
The world has not forgotten 26/11. asserted
world → forget → 26/11
The world has not forgotten Pahalgam,” Mr. Puri said, adding that the list, “unfortunately”, is painfully long. asserted
list → forget → Pahalgam
“The victims in Pahalgam were not asked about their political orientation, they were asked about their religion. asserted
they → ask → religion
It is therefore deeply ironic that Pakistan speaks of combating religious hatred while allowing the conditions that enable it to persist and thrive, especially by fomenting cross-border terrorism,” he said. asserted
he → speak → terrorism
“Pakistan continues with its narrative building, misinformation, and disinformation. asserted
Pakistan → continue → building
If bombed-out airfields and cratered runways look like victory to Pakistan, they are of course welcome to enjoy it," Mr. Puri said. asserted
Puri → bomb → it
"Any regime against terrorism to be effective must do two things — assign responsibility and ensure accountability. asserted
regime → do → accountability
India will defend its people, and continued terrorism against India will have consequences,” he added. asserted
he → defend → consequences
In another Right of Reply, Mr. Puri said India rejected Pakistan’s “circular economy” of words and narratives. asserted
India → say → words
“If this much effort had actually been made in countering terrorism rather than narrative building, misinformation, and disinformation, the world would have been a better place. asserted
world → make → terrorism
But nothing more can be expected from a Form 47 government,” he said, referring to a term used to describe allegations of rigging and manipulation in Pakistan’s 2024 general elections. asserted
he → expect → elections
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support