Third of public back assisted dying law only with more palliative funding – poll

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Fox, Y. Á. (2026, September 7). Third of public back assisted dying law only with more palliative funding – poll. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/andy-burnham-house-of-commons-support-parliament-mps-b1295983.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-09-07 · by Y. Áine Fox

Quick Summary

A poll of 1,133 people found that six in 10 (61%) support the return of an assisted dying bill to Parliament, while three in 10 (30%) agree with making it legal without additional investment in end-of-life care. The polling also showed that a third (34%) of respondents think assisting dying should be made legal only if accompanied by extra funding for state-funded end-of-life care. Older people aged 55-75 were most likely to support the bill's return, with 67% backing it, while support varied across age groups. Support for assisted dying has remained relatively stable at around two-thirds (66-68%) since the bill was first introduced in late 2024.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

A new poll has found that 61% of people support the reintroduction of the assisted dying Bill to Parliament, with 13% opposed and 14% undecided. The bill, being brought by Labour MP Lauren Edwards, has been met with relatively stable support since its introduction in late 2024. However, a third of respondents (34%) said they only support the law if it is accompanied by additional investment in state-funded end-of-life care. Older people aged 55-75 were most likely to support the bill's return at 67%, followed by those aged 35-54 at 63%. The poll was conducted by Ipsos for the Press Association and surveyed 1,133 people aged 16-75 in late August.

Written for “Public Support for Assisted Dying” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Public Support for Assisted Dying
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A reports on public support for the assisted dying Bill, while Article B reports on lawmakers voting on the bill again”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 4 of 26 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A discusses a poll on support for assisted dying law, while Article B describes an upcoming event in Parliament”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
2 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
65/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 6513 article(s) · 56 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 56 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Y. Áine Fox
14 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Then-health secretary Matt Hancock’s claim – made in May 2020 about protections at the start of the pandemic – was “unfounded”, UK Covid-19 Inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett said, adding: “Quite the opposite was true.”
🔮 Then-health secretary Matt Hancock’s claim – made in May 2020 about protections at the start of the pandemic – was “unfounded”, UK Covid-19 Inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett said, adding: “Quite the opposite was true.”
🔮 Then-health secretary Matt Hancock’s claim – made in May 2020 about protections at the start of the pandemic – was “unfounded”, UK Covid-19 Inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett said, adding: “Quite the opposite was true”.
🔮 Read More Then-health secretary Matt Hancock’s claim – made in May 2020 about protections at the start of the pandemic – was “unfounded”, UK Covid-19 Inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett said, adding: “Quite the opposite was true”.
🔮 A larger memorial service is expected to take place at a later date, with details yet to be announced.
🔮 Consultant psychiatrist Dr Jed Boardman said the figures as they are officially recorded likely “don’t tell the whole story”, as many people will have “multiple disabling conditions”, made up of mental and physical health symptoms, as well as other conditions such as autism.
🔮 Under previous NHS guidance, trans patients could be accommodated on single-sex wards based on the gender with which they identified.
🔮 Some 43% of those polled admitted having avoided seeing friends or family because they could not afford essential hygiene items or cleaning products in the past six months.
🔮 Within a year of saying she would hold a free vote on assisted dying if she was prime minister, a Bill passed its first stage in the Commons in what was hailed a historic moment.
🔮 In 2007, as head of the Pakistan Ulema Council group of Islamic clerics and scholars, the imam said he would give bin Laden – the orchestrator of the September 11 terror attacks – the title Saifullah, which means “Sword of God”, for “serving Muslims by waging jihad against infidels”.
Also by Y. Áine Fox
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 14 articles by Y. Áine Fox →

Topics

Ipsos Labour Parliament the Press Association the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)

Subjects

Parliament ORG · 2× Ipsos ORG · 1× Kim Leadbeater PERSON · 1× Labour ORG · 1× Lauren Edwards PERSON · 1× NHS ORG · 1× the Press Association ORG · 1×

Narrative

The new polling found 34% of people said assisting dying should be made legal but only if it is accompanied by additional investment in state-funded end-of-life care. Meanwhile, three in 10 (30%) said they agreed with the statement that assisted dying should be made legal, even without extra investment in this kind of care.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 The Government has a neutral position on the Bill and MPs will vote according to their consciences, rather than along party lines.

Claims (13 extracted, 2 hedged)

Six in 10 people support the return of the assisted dying Bill to Parliament, but a third of the public feel the law should only be changed if there is more funding for end-of-life care alongside it, according to new polling. uncertain
law → support → polling
Support for assisted dying being legalised has remained relatively stable since the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was first introduced to Parliament in late 2024, the Ipsos polling for the Press Association found. asserted
polling → assist → Association
Of 1,133 people aged 16-75 surveyed at the end of August, 61% said they supported the reintroduction of the Bill, which is being brought by Labour MP Lauren Edwards who has taken it over from her party colleague Kim Leadbeater. asserted
who → survey → colleague
Fourteen per cent said they opposed the return of the Bill while the same proportion said they did not support or oppose it. asserted
they → say → it
The rest said they did not know or preferred not to say. asserted
they → say → ?
Older people – aged 55-75 – were most likely to support the Bill’s return (67%). asserted
people → age → return
This compared with 63% of 35-54 year-olds and just over half (52%) of people aged 16 to 34. asserted
This → compare → people
However, giving some insight into his view on the issue shortly after becoming PM in July, he said he believed the funding of palliative care needs to be fixed before consideration can be given to legalising assisted dying. asserted
consideration → give → dying
Palliative care is described by the NHS as the management of pain and other distressing symptoms which should be available as soon as someone first learns they have a life-limiting or terminal illness, while end-of-life care is a form of palliative care given when someone is close to death. asserted
someone → describe → death
The new polling found 34% of people said assisting dying should be made legal but only if it is accompanied by additional investment in state-funded end-of-life care. Meanwhile, three in 10 (30%) said they agreed with the statement that assisted dying should be made legal, even without extra investment in this kind of care. asserted
dying → find → care
One in 10 people said they opposed legalising assisted dying and said there should be more funding for end-of-life care, while 7% said assisted dying should not be legalised even if it was accompanied by further investment in such care. asserted
it → say → care
Support for the principle of assisted dying, where it is legal for a doctor to prescribe life-ending medication to a consenting terminally ill adult was at 68% when the latest polling was done, up slightly from 66% in October 2024. Read More Opposition remained at 16% across that two-year period. asserted
Opposition → assist → period
The Government has a neutral position on the Bill and MPs will vote according to their consciences, rather than along party lines. uncertain
MPs → have → lines
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support