A report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights has expressed "deep concern" over the use of a remedial order to remove conditional immunity from prosecutions for Troubles-era crimes. The committee recommends improving the independency of the new Legacy Commission and widening the definition of "close family member". It also asks the Government to justify its decision-making on issues such as revived inquests and information disclosure, and suggests adding a requirement for Attorney General consent to prosecute any future Troubles-related offences. The report was prompted by concerns over the UK's human rights framework and the impact of legacy legislation on those affected by the Troubles.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) said improvements must to be made to the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill.
asserted
improvements → say → Bill
Committee chairman Lord David Alton said the legislation has to secure the confidence of those it impacts and said the importance of getting it right “cannot be understated”.
asserted
it → say → those
Labour introduced the Bill to replace the previous government’s controversial Legacy Act, elements of which were deemed in court judgments to be incompatible with human rights commitments.
asserted
elements → introduce → commitments
Labour’s Bill, agreed as part of a joint framework with the Irish Government, will put in place a reformed Legacy Commission with enhanced powers.
asserted
Bill → agree → powers
As part of its legislative process, MPs have already backed a remedial order which removed the measures in the previous Act providing conditional immunity from prosecutions for Troubles-era crimes in exchange for co-operation with a truth recovery body, as well as scrapping a bar on future legacy compensation cases.
asserted
which → back → cases
The JCHR report scrutinises whether the Troubles Bill is compatible with the UK’s domestic and international human rights framework, and examines its wider implications.
asserted
Bill → scrutinise → implications
The committee expresses “deep concern” about the use of the remedial order which was laid before Parliament as “a stop gap” between the old and new legislation.
asserted
which → express → legislation
The committee said the Government’s justification for using the order because the matter was urgent “has not been reflected in its speed in advancing the remedial order”.
asserted
matter → say → order
The report has also recommended improving the independency of the proposed new Legacy Commission and the decision-making process around the disclosure of sensitive information.
asserted
report → recommend → information
It said the definition of “close family member” should be widened to ensure that other family members are not excluded.
asserted
members → say → member
The report has also asked the Government for more information to justify decision making on issues including the two different approaches for revived inquests and the use of information submitted to the Independent Commission on Information Retrieval.
asserted
report → ask → Retrieval
The Government has pledged to provide “effective protections” for military veterans who served in Northern Ireland during the Troubles in its new legislation.
asserted
who → pledge → legislation
The committee said it “acknowledges the sincerely held concerns of veterans today that legal processes involved in inquests, civil claims and criminal prosecutions are having a negative impact on the lives of individuals”.
uncertain
processes → say → individuals
It added: “Where, in rare circumstances, there are allegations of profound, even lethal wrongdoing, they must be properly investigated.
“The Bill’s approach must ensure that those investigations are carried out in a manner which is fair to all those involved.
asserted
which → add → those
“The Government should consider adding provisions to the Bill to require the consent of the Attorney General to prosecute any future Troubles-related offences.
asserted
Government → consider → offences
“This could add an extra layer of accountability for prosecution decisions in this sensitive area.”
uncertain
This → add → area
The committee also raises concerns about the failure of Westminster and the Northern Ireland Executive to agree on who should be funding legacy matters.
asserted
who → raise → matters
It said: “The Troubles Bill will not be able to succeed without adequate financial support being given to all organisations affected by it.
asserted
support → say → it
“Dialogue should continue to resolve the impasse on funding.”
asserted
Dialogue → continue → funding
Lord Alton said: “This Bill is an improvement on what came before it, but our report has found areas where it must be improved further.
asserted
it → say → areas
“This isn’t just about making sure the right legal and procedural frameworks are in place.
asserted
frameworks → make → place
“It is about making sure it is in the best position to secure the confidence of those it impacts from the start and over the long-term.
asserted
it → make → term
“The importance of getting this Bill right cannot be understated.”
asserted
Bill → get → ?
Lord Alton said “flaws” in the previous Legacy Act “contributed to a decade of lost progress”.
asserted
flaws → say → progress
He said: “Time is running out for those still dealing with the legacy of the Troubles to find out what happened and hold people accountable.
asserted
people → say → Troubles
“We cannot have further delay.”
asserted
We → have → delay
The joint committee said it will conduct further work on the Bill when further amendments are made in the continuing legislative process.
asserted
amendments → say → process
The spokesperson added: “To that end, the Government welcomes the scrutiny of the JCHR, and its recognition that the Bill is a significant improvement on the failed Legacy Act.
asserted
Bill → add → Act
“We will create a framework that commands greater public confidence, including bringing forward a significant package of amendments following extensive engagement with veterans.”
asserted
that → create → veterans
