Interviewing Justice Clint Bolick (Ariz.) at UCLA School of Law Monday, October 19 at 5:30 pm

Read the original at Reason ↗
Reason · collected 2026-10-07 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

The Volokh Conspiracy blog announces a talk by Justice Clint Bolick at UCLA School of Law on October 19 at 5:30 pm. The event is titled "Litigating for Liberty / Judging About Liberty" and is part of the Libertarian Litigation Speaker Series. Before becoming a judge, Bolick was known for his work as a libertarian litigator and cofounding the Institute for Justice law firm. He will discuss his experiences and views on liberty both before and after joining the bench. The event is open to UCLA students and the public; those interested in attending should RSVP by October 9 to receive dinner.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Justice Clint Bolick, a prominent judicial expert on state constitutions and former libertarian litigator, is scheduled to speak at UCLA School of Law on Monday, October 19 at 5:30 pm. The event, titled "Litigating for Liberty / Judging About Liberty," is part of the Libertarian Litigation Speaker Series. Bolick cofounded the Institute for Justice, a leading libertarian public interest law firm focusing on economic liberty and school choice among other issues.

The talk aims to cover his experiences as both a lawyer and judge, discussing his approach to liberty in these roles. The event is primarily intended for UCLA students but is open to the public; those interested must RSVP by October 9th to receive a dinner box catered by Sweetpea.

Written for “Justice Clint Bolick Interview” on 2026-10-08, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 64216 · logged 2026-10-07

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
7
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 7 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
66.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-07 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Justice Clint Bolick Interview
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Reason · 600 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-10-02
Would a Firing Squad Have Been More 'Humane' for Christa Pike?
2026-09-26
"I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me"
2026-09-18
New Article: Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections: Bringing Clarity To The Necessary and Proper Clause
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
123 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He will speak about his experience, and his approach to liberty, both in his time as a lawyer and in his time as a judge.
🔮 The requirements of paragraph a. shall not apply if compliance would impose an operational or financial burden on the state or local entity and their employees.
🔮 And, if the decision endures, it will likely be followed by many other such decisions.
🔮 Since 2020, the Department has also collected the names of individual foreign donors while stating that it would not publish them.
🔮 When officers told him he would need to move, Geri refused and threatened to throw one of his explosive devices into the street to demonstrate its destructive power.
🔮 Here's an excerpt from the discussion of why Matar was acting sufficiently under the direction of a foreign terrorist organization (which is required under the relevant federal statute) rather than just independently—if he had been acting independently, that would have still been attempted murder punishable under state law, but likely not a violation of these statutes:
🔮 Because in the late 1800s, "race" was understood to include what today might refer to "ethnicity" (e.g., German, Arab, Jewish), the Court concluded that § 1981 extends to such discrimination based on ethnicity.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From yesterday's Blackman v. Substack, Inc., by California Court of Appeal Justices Tracie Brown and Danny Chou and Marin County Judge Andrew Sweet: "'[I]f a newspaper lawfully obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance then state officials may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need to further a state interest of the highest order.'"
🔮 On June 7th of 2020, while Stephanie Rapkin was sleeping in her bed, members of the Shorewood and Whitefish Bay police departments were outside her home, trying to think of an excuse to enter, so they could arrest her on allegations that she pushed a protestor picketing outside of her home.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-07 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 123 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

L.A. UCLA UCLA School of Law the Institute for Justice the Libertarian Litigation Speaker Series

Subjects

Bolick PERSON · 1× L.A. GPE · 1× Sweetpea ORG · 1× UCLA ORG · 1× UCLA School of Law ORG · 1× the Institute for Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

And before going on the bench, he was a prominent libertarian litigator: Among other achievements, he cofounded the Institute for Justice, one of the nation's leading libertarian public interest law firms, which specializes in matters such as economic liberty, school choice, and more.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-07
🔮 He will speak about his experience, and his approach to liberty, both in his time as a lawyer and in his time as a judge.

Claims (7 extracted, 0 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent The talk, "Litigating for Liberty / Judging About Liberty," is part of the Libertarian Litigation Speaker Series at UCLA School of Law (room 1457). asserted
talk → litigate → room
Justice Bolick, as many of you know, is one of the most prominent judicial experts on state constitutions, including the special protection they offer individual rights. asserted
they → know → rights
And before going on the bench, he was a prominent libertarian litigator: Among other achievements, he cofounded the Institute for Justice, one of the nation's leading libertarian public interest law firms, which specializes in matters such as economic liberty, school choice, and more. asserted
which → go → liberty
He will speak about his experience, and his approach to liberty, both in his time as a lawyer and in his time as a judge. asserted
He → speak → judge
The event is mostly aimed at UCLA students, but is also open to the public. asserted
event → aim → public
If you're in L.A. and would like to join us, please RSVP at this link by October 9 (this Friday) for a dinner box catered by Sweetpea. asserted
you → like → Sweetpea
You should feel free to attend in any case, but only an RSVP will get you dinner. asserted
RSVP → feel → dinner
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support