ANDREW GRIFFITH: Healey risks bankrupting Britain if he takes the easy option of just hiking taxes

News | Mail Online · collected 2026-09-06 · by Andrew Griffith analysis
Read the original at News | Mail Online ↗

Summary

The article written by Andrew Griffith argues that John Healey, the new Labour Chancellor, will continue with tax hikes that will hurt hard-working families and businesses. Griffith claims that Healey's plans will not prioritize supporting the Armed Forces, which he believes should be funded more generously. The author suggests that Labour's policies disproportionately target business owners and entrepreneurs who create jobs, rather than allowing them to grow and thrive. Griffith implies that the Conservatives would take a different approach, prioritizing lower taxes and reduced regulations to support businesses.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
11%
3 of 27 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
57.6
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · source text last changed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

*Andrew Griffith*, a former board director at *Sky*, is criticizing Andy Burnham, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, for considering tax hikes that could harm hard-working families and businesses. Griffith argues that these tax rises will not be used to support the Armed Forces, but instead will fall on ordinary people and businesses who are already struggling. As a former business leader, Griffith claims he has more experience than Burnham's entire Cabinet put together and believes that *governments do not create growth, businesses do*. He suggests that the Labour party is prioritizing tax rises on businesses despite claiming to support growth in every postcode. Griffith argues that this approach will stifle entrepreneurship and hinder economic recovery.

Written for “UK Tax Hikes Under Fire” on 2026-09-07, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.85 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.85 for article 6295 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-07

Story

📰 UK Tax Hikes Under Fire
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
US news | The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 10% hedged 10 of 104 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a reshuffle of Kemi Badenoch's shadow cabinet and James Cleverly's potential mayoral run, while Article B is about Rachel Reeves' appointment as Shadow Chancellor and her views on economics”
News | Mail Online
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 14 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles mention different people and events, with Article A discussing a warning from Andrew Bailey about UK debt and Article B writing an opinion piece by Andrew Griffith about Labour's economic policies.”
News | Mail Online
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 26 📰 publisher trust 58
“Article A reports on Robert Jenrick's pledge to cut taxes and his promise to resign if it isn't met within 100 days, while Article B is a commentary piece by Andrew Griffith discussing tax hikes and economic growth, without mentioning Jenrick or the specific event”
News | Mail Online
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 10% hedged 4 of 39 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles mention different individuals (LORD ASHCROFT and ANDREW GRIFFITH) writing about unrelated topics (Labour's financial management and tax policies)”
The Standard
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 17% hedged 3 of 18 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses job losses and government reforms in Scotland, while Article B discusses tax hikes and the author's background as Shadow Chancellor.”
How New Is Andy Burnham’s Labour? different event · 100%
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses two separate topics: Andy Burnham's Labour and John Healey's speech, while Article B focuses on Andrew Griffith's views on taxation and his business experience.”
News | Mail Online
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 40 📰 publisher trust 58
“Article A discusses Andrew Griffith's business experience and the role of businesses in growth, while Article B is about Andy Burnham giving green light to a natural gas project”
News | Mail Online
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 58
“The two articles cover different topics and events, with Article A discussing a speech by Andrew Griffith and Article B discussing an interview with John Swinney about public sector reform.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 25 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses Andrew Griffith's views on taxation, while Article B reports on John Healey's speech about the UK economy”
News | Mail Online
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 9% hedged 6 of 66 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles mention different people and incidents: Andrew Griffith discusses Labour's potential taxation policies, while Stephen Glover writes about Nigel Farage's troubles with Reform UK”

Publisher

News | Mail Online · 186 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.011 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.090 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 1.000 0.35
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-07
The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary
2026-09-06
Clarifications and corrections

Who wrote this

Andrew Griffith
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source When I was appointed Shadow Chancellor a week ago today, it was pointed out – somewhat to my horror – that I may have more business experience than all of Andy Burnham's Cabinet put together. A career that went from injecting jam into doughnuts at a Tesco bakery to working as a board director at Sky teaches you a fundamental lesson that successive Labour administrations have yet to realise: Governments do not create growth, businesses do.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Cabinet Daily Mail Labour Sky Tesco

Subjects

Labour ORG · 5× Burnham PERSON · 2× Cabinet ORG · 2× Conservatives NORP · 2× John Healey PERSON · 2× Andy Burnham's PERSON · 1× Daily Mail ORG · 1× Government ORG · 1× Sky ORG · 1× Tesco ORG · 1×

Narrative

That is why, on my third day in the job, I sat alongside James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, and Helen Whately, the shadow secretary for work and pensions, as our leader Kemi Badenoch unveiled the work we had done to find the money we need to fund defence to the tune of 3 per cent of GDP.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source When I was appointed Shadow Chancellor a week ago today, it was pointed out – somewhat to my horror – that I may have more business experience than all of Andy Burnham's Cabinet put together. A career that went from injecting jam into doughnuts at a Tesco bakery to working as a board director at Sky teaches you a fundamental lesson that successive Labour administrations have yet to realise: Governments do not create growth, businesses do.

Claims (27 extracted, 3 hedged)

- See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source When I was appointed Shadow Chancellor a week ago today, it was pointed out – somewhat to my horror – that I may have more business experience than all of Andy Burnham's Cabinet put together. A career that went from injecting jam into doughnuts at a Tesco bakery to working as a board director at Sky teaches you a fundamental lesson that successive Labour administrations have yet to realise: Governments do not create growth, businesses do. uncertain
businesses → see → growth
That is why I left the corporate world to enter politics. asserted
I → leave → politics
I understood that, for too long, the Government had seen it as its job to micro-manage rather than get out of the way. asserted
Government → understand → way
As shadow chancellor, I will work night and day to smooth the path for both businesses and individuals. asserted
I → work → businesses
That means lower and simpler taxes, cheaper energy, less red tape and support for risk-taking entrepreneurs. asserted
That → mean → entrepreneurs
Because right now, they are being attacked rather than being allowed to grow. asserted
they → attack → ?
Despite growth being Labour's supposed number one priority, and Burnham pledging 'growth in every postcode', the party has disproportionately targeted tax rises at businesses. asserted
party → suppose → businesses
Whether it's a hike in employer's National Insurance, a stealth increase in business rates, or allowing energy costs to go sky-high, Labour's policies crush the sort of people who create jobs and put money in pockets. asserted
who → allow → pockets
If anyone thinks a new Chancellor will mean a different approach, they are mistaken. asserted
they → think → approach
John Healey has himself said that he will be a 'continuity' Chancellor, writes Andrew Griffith If anyone thinks a new Chancellor will mean a different approach, they are mistaken. asserted
they → say → approach
John Healey has himself said that he will be a 'continuity' Chancellor. asserted
he → say → ?
Since he was in the Cabinet that took collective responsibility for every one of his predecessor Rachel Reeves's disastrous decisions, businesses and families will already be fearing yet more tax hikes. asserted
businesses → take → hikes
Add in the enormous black hole of spending promises Burnham has made, plus the rising cost of borrowing, and the story begins to sound all too familiar. asserted
story → add → borrowing
Like his 1970s namesake Denis Healey, the new man at No11 is coming back for more tax, and it will be hard-working families and businesses who pay the price. asserted
who → come → price
It is increasingly clear these tax rises will not be used to support our cash-starved Armed Forces. asserted
rises → use → Forces
Despite resigning over Starmer and Reeves's failure to properly fund defence, the Chancellor now seems to be raising the white flag. asserted
Chancellor → resign → flag
Once again it will be Benefits Street taking precedence over Horse Guards Parade, despite the scandal that disability claims are rising faster in the UK than war-torn Ukraine. uncertain
claims → take → Ukraine
At a time when Argentina is making bogus claims over British sovereign territory in the Falklands, how can the Chancellor choose benefits for anxiety and other low-level mental health conditions over funding our Army, Air Force and Navy? uncertain
Chancellor → make → Army
Conservatives understand the trade-off and are not afraid to say that welfare should be a safety net not a lifestyle choice. asserted
welfare → understand → off
That is why, on my third day in the job, I sat alongside James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, and Helen Whately, the shadow secretary for work and pensions, as our leader Kemi Badenoch unveiled the work we had done to find the money we need to fund defence to the tune of 3 per cent of GDP. asserted
we → sit → GDP
But, when you know whose side you are on, they are not. asserted
they → know → side
The Conservatives are unashamedly on the side of those who work hard, run a business, aspire to own their own home and put down roots in a community. asserted
who → work → community
If we can reform welfare and rewire the state, we will be able to cut bad taxes – such as Stamp Duty – scrap business rates for thousands of firms such as pubs, and fully fund our Armed Forces. asserted
we → reform → Forces
Healey faces tough choices as he prepares his first Budget. asserted
he → face → Budget
He should commit to no more tax rises. asserted
He → commit → rises
But I fear that, as Labour Chancellors always do, he will take the easy way out. asserted
he → fear → way
And if he does, he risks becoming the second Chancellor called Healey to bankrupt Britain. asserted
he → do → Britain
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support