An anti-terrorism court in Islamabad proceeded with the formal indictment of lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha despite objections over incomplete legal procedures. Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra dismissed their arguments that they had not received copies of case documents or been allowed to meet their lawyers, proceeding with the indictment on Tuesday. The court scheduled a hearing for October 9 where prosecution witnesses will be summoned. Imaan and Hadi were arrested in January and rearrested in September after initial sentences were suspended by the Supreme Court.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-07,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
On Tuesday, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Islamabad formally indicted lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha for alleged disruption of the security route of an international cricket team and incitement to public unrest. The charges included sections 188, 341, 506, 353, and 186 under Pakistan's penal code. During the proceedings, Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra presided over the case, where both accused were produced through a video link. Hadi objected to the framing of charges due to incomplete legal formalities and lack of access to case documents and their lawyers. Despite these objections, the court proceeded with the indictment. The judge noted that the accused could challenge this order if they wished to do so. Prosecution witnesses are set to be summoned on Friday.
Written for “Imaan Hadi Security Breach Indictment” on 2026-10-07,
grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 2 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph
rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 62120: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-07
An anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Tuesday formally indicted lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha in a case pertaining to the alleged disruption of the security route of an international cricket team and incitement to public unrest.
asserted
court → indict → unrest
Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra presided over the proceedings, during which both accused were produced through video link.
asserted
accused → preside → link
At the outset, Hadi objected to the framing of charges, stating that he had not yet been provided copies of the case documents.
asserted
he → object → documents
He argued that charges could not be framed before completion of all legal formalities.
uncertain
charges → argue → formalities
Advocate Zainab Janjua, representing Imaan and Hadi, also opposed the indictment, submitting that neither of them had been provided copies of the case record.
asserted
neither → represent → record
She further contended that both the accused had not been allowed to meet their lawyers, and therefore the requirements for framing charges had not been fulfilled.
asserted
requirements → contend → charges
Despite the objections, the court proceeded with the formal indictment of both accused.
asserted
court → proceed → accused
Addressing Imaan and Hadi, Judge Sipra observed that they could challenge the order if they wished to do so.
uncertain
they → address → order
The court subsequently summoned prosecution witnesses on Friday and directed that both accused be produced before the court at the next hearing.
asserted
accused → summon → hearing
The proceedings were then adjourned until October 9 (Friday).
asserted
proceedings → adjourn → October
The indictment hearing had been postponed on Tuesday after it appeared that Imaan and Hadi could not be produced in court via video link due to a power outage.
uncertain
Imaan → postpone → outage
Judge Sipra had directed jail authorities to ensure the presence of both accused through video link at the next hearing, warning that contempt of court proceedings would be initiated in case of non-compliance.
asserted
proceedings → direct → compliance
The lawyer couple has been in jail since their arrest on Jan 23 in a case registered against them for protesting outside the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and allegedly manhandling the IHC Bar Association (IHCBA) president.
uncertain
couple → register → president
The arrest prompted criticism by rights bodies, politicians and journalists, who stressed the couple’s right to a fair trial.
asserted
who → prompt → trial
Just a day later, a sessions court sentenced them to 17 years on multiple charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) in a case pertaining to controversial social media posts.
asserted
court → sentence → posts
The convictions were widely condemned by lawyers and United Nations (UN) experts.
asserted
convictions → condemn → lawyers
On Sept 17, following months of litigation before the courts, the Supreme Court suspended their sentences in the case.
asserted
Court → follow → case
The SC ordered their release pending the Islamabad High Court’s final verdict on their appeals against the trial court’s decision.
asserted
SC → order → decision
However, the reprieve was short-lived as hours later, Islamabad police arrested the couple again in connection with another case and produced them before an ATC, which sent them to jail on judicial remand.
asserted
which → live → remand
The fresh case in which the two were arrested was registered at the federal capital’s Kohsar police station on March 22 last year on the complaint of City Magistrate Ghulam Murtaza Chandio.
asserted
two → arrest → Chandio
Imaan and her husband were accused of chanting anti-government slogans and blocking roads and were nominated by name in the FIR.
asserted
Imaan → accuse → FIR
However, at the time of registration of the case, no section of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) had been added.
asserted
section → add → Act
The FIR included sections 188 (disobedience of an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant), 341 (wrongful restraint), 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), 353 (assault or use of criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging their official duty) and 186 (obstructing a public servant in the performance of official duties).
asserted
FIR → include → duties
The Aporia
