California's Democratic leaders are facing a standoff with utility company PG&E after it announced plans to cut $2 billion from its planned spending due to growing financial burdens from California's wildfire-liability rules. This decision comes after lawmakers ended their session without reaching an agreement on how to change the state's approach to wildfire costs. Assemblywoman Cottie Petrie-Norris, chair of the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee, expressed concern that PG&E's reduction in spending could lead to increased borrowing costs for customers. The move is part of a broader dispute over who should pay when utility equipment sparks wildfires, with PG&E and other utilities pushing for changes to be able to pass on some costs to insurance companies.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
California’s Democratic leaders are facing a fresh standoff with the state’s biggest utility after PG&E announced it would pull back billions of dollars in planned spending.
asserted
it → face → spending
The move now has put renewed pressure on Sacramento to resolve a bitter fight over who should pay when utility equipment sparks catastrophic wildfires.
asserted
equipment → put → wildfires
PG&E said it plans to reduce its 2027 investments by about $2 billion, citing the growing financial burden of California’s wildfire-liability rules.
asserted
it → say → rules
The announcement comes just after lawmakers ended their legislative session without reaching a deal that would have changed how the state’s major investor-owned utilities shoulder wildfire costs.
asserted
utilities → come → costs
The move has put Democratic lawmakers in the position of weighing the utilities’ concerns about financing against demands for accountability when their equipment is responsible for devastating fires.
asserted
equipment → put → fires
Assemblywoman Cottie Petrie-Norris, the Democratic chair of the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee, told KCRA 3 that utilities depend on borrowing to finance major construction projects — and that higher borrowing costs can ultimately affect customers.
asserted
costs → tell → customers
Sign up for the California Morning Report newsletter
California's top news, sports and entertainment delivered to your inbox every day.
asserted
Sign → sign → inbox
“With utilities, like any company, in order to build stuff, they’ve got to borrow money,” Petrie-Norris said.
asserted
Norris → build → money
“Much like you and I, when we’ve got a mortgage, if our credit rating isn’t good, it costs us more money.
asserted
it → get → money
“And when it costs PG&E or any of the utilities more money to build and construct utility projects, that’s a bill that gets passed on to all of us, and that’s not OK,” she added.
asserted
she → cost → us
Petrie-Norris said the reduction in spending could affect projects involving infrastructure such as poles, wires and sensors, as well as housing-related work, according to the outlet.
“That’s also not OK.
uncertain
That → say → outlet
So that’s why I’m concerned, and that’s why it matters for all of us,” she said.
asserted
she → ’ → us
The confrontation follows a dramatic collapse of a proposed wildfire-liability overhaul in Sacramento.
asserted
confrontation → follow → Sacramento
PG&E, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric had pushed lawmakers to shift some wildfire-related costs toward insurance companies.
asserted
PG&E → push → companies
But the legislature ultimately abandoned the proposal after negotiations broke down during the final days of the session.
asserted
negotiations → abandon → session
The broader dispute centers on subrogation, under which insurers that pay homeowners after a wildfire can seek reimbursement from utilities they believe are responsible for the blaze.
asserted
they → center → blaze
Gov. Gavin Newsom and the utilities had backed restrictions on that practice as part of a broader liability overhaul, while opponents argued the changes could leave wildfire victims and insurers carrying more of the financial burden.
uncertain
changes → back → burden
Petrie-Norris said she hopes PG&E’s spending decision was not intended to pressure lawmakers.
asserted
decision → say → lawmakers
“I certainly hope not.
asserted
I → hope → ?
But that is definitely a question you would have to ask their CEO, not me,” she told KCRA 3.
asserted
she → have → KCRA
The lawmaker also warned that the fight has drawn an array of powerful interests, including utilities, insurers, hedge funds and attorneys.
asserted
fight → warn → utilities
“When two elephants are fighting, it’s the grass that suffers,” Petrie-Norris said.
asserted
Norris → fight → ?
“We don’t care about your companies.
asserted
We → care → companies
We don’t care about your industry.
asserted
We → care → industry
We care about what you are doing for Californians.”
asserted
you → care → Californians
PG&E has maintained that its spending reduction is driven by the difficulty and expense of financing its operations under California’s current liability structure.
asserted
reduction → maintain → structure
The company is still planning billions of dollars in investment next year and has said its pullback will focus on projects that can be delayed rather than critical wildfire-safety obligations.
asserted
that → plan → obligations
The utility’s CEO has also rejected the suggestion that the announcement was intended as a political pressure tactic, arguing that customers ultimately bear the consequences of the state’s financing and liability framework.
Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters
PG&E said it plans to reduce its 2027 investments by about $2 billion, citing the growing financial burden of California’s wildfire-liability rules.
asserted
it → reject → rules
California Democrat Cottie Petrie-Norris said, "When it costs PG&E or any of the utilities more money to build and construct utility projects, that's a bill that gets passed on to all of us."
asserted
that → say → us
Patti Poppe, chief executive officer of PG&E Corp.
PG&E shares plunged 20% after California Democrats gutted Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposal, which sought to change who pays when utility equipment sparks catastrophic wildfires.
asserted
equipment → plunge → wildfires
Petrie-Norris said she hopes PG&E’s spending decision was not intended to pressure lawmakers.
asserted
decision → say → lawmakers
