The rules regarding the “right to copy” intellectual property were first protected by Great Britain’s Statute of Anne in 1710.
asserted
rules → regard → 1710
The US followed with its own law a month later.
asserted
US → follow → law
Canada jumped on board in 1832 as a colony and reaffirmed it as a country in 1921.
asserted
Canada → jump → 1921
These laws protect creators and those who invest in something that benefits the public at large.
asserted
that → protect → public
Woe to anyone who tries to steal these ideas, concepts, and creations.
asserted
who → try → ideas
Just ask Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams what they went through with their song Blurred Lines (which they lost), or Ed Sheeran, who battled over the originality of his Shape of You (in which he eventually prevailed).
asserted
he → ask → which
Copyright, of course, extends to music.
asserted
Copyright → extend → music
Great Britain clamped down on sheet music piracy in 1777, followed by France in 1791 and the US in 1831.
asserted
Britain → clamp → 1831
The last of these was important because protection was extended from just sheet music to melody and lyrics, something that we take very, very seriously.
asserted
we → extend → that
Today, if your song sounds suspiciously like a previously released track, you could end up defending yourself in court on charges of plagiarism.
uncertain
you → sound → plagiarism
Radiohead, Ed Sheeran, Sam Smith, and many others have spent millions on lawyers extricating themselves from such issues, often with mixed success.
asserted
lawyers → spend → success
There are, however, three musical things you cannot claim as your own forever and ever.
uncertain
you → be → own
Nothing prevents anyone from calling their new song Smells Like Teen Spirit, although that would be a bad idea.
asserted
that → prevent → Spirit
But it does explain why the title Hold On has been used by artists ranging from Santana and Kansas to Wilson Phillips and Justin Bieber.
asserted
title → explain → Phillips
Chord progressions are also free to use because they are considered to be the building blocks of composition.
asserted
they → use → composition
This includes guitar riffs, which, at their heart, are just another type of chord progression.
asserted
which → include → progression
For example, let’s compare these three songs.
asserted
’s → let → songs
The third thing a composer can’t copyright is a rhythm.
asserted
composer → copyright → ?
Again, beats are fundamental to creating music and can’t be protected by one artist.
asserted
beats → create → artist
One very common example is the seven-note Shave and a Haircut Two Bits, which dates to at least 1899 when it appeared in a minstrel song entitled At a Darktown Cake Walk.
asserted
it → date → Walk
You’ve heard variations eleventy billion times.
asserted
You → hear → variations
But what would happen if, through some quirk of law, a beat was ruled eligible for copyright?
asserted
beat → happen → copyright
Suddenly, all the songs in the known universe using that beat would suddenly be infringing on copyright.
asserted
songs → use → copyright
Vast sums of money would have to flow to the entity that successfully laid sole claim to that rhythm
This was the potential outcome of the Steely and Clevie copyright case involving what is known as the “dembow riddim,” which was used as the beat for Fish Market, a B-side to an obscure single released in Jamaica in 1989.
uncertain
which → have → 1989
The “boom-ch-boom-chick” rhythm rose out of the Caribbean with the rise of dancehall music.
asserted
rhythm → rise → music
Over the past few decades, it’s become a very popular beat that has been used on nearly 2,000 songs from artists ranging from Shabba Ranks (Demo Bow, 1990) to Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee (Despocito, 2017) to Ed Sheeran (Shape of You, 2017).
asserted
that → become → You
It’s also a foundational beat for practically the entire reggaeton genre, including a long list of songs by Bad Bunny.
asserted
It → ’ → Bunny
Get daily National news
In 2021, the estate of Wycliffe “Steely” Johnson (he died in 2009), filed a lawsuit in California against Universal Music and Warner Chappell Music, claiming that Steely and his partner, Cleveland “Clevie” Brown were the originators of the dembow riddim and were thus its rightful owners.
asserted
Steely → get → riddim
Any song by any artist using the dembow riddim was thus in violation of copyright and therefore owed Steely and Clevie a lot of money.
asserted
song → use → money
What should have been an open-and-shut case– copyright law clearly says that rhythms are exempt from exclusive ownership–dragged on for almost five years.
asserted
rhythms → say → years
Eventually, everything ended up in the hands of Judge André Birotte Jr. In July, he said that this case had to go to a jury, which was completely unexpected.
asserted
which → end → jury
Then, in another unexpected move (and after Bad Bunny’s attorneys convinced him to reconsider), Judge Birotte reversed himself, saying that the people representing Steely and Clevie failed to establish a case for control of the rhythm.
asserted
people → convince → rhythm
The final ruling is that the plaintiffs had attempted to base ownership of the beat on a “Frankenstein copyright.”
asserted
plaintiffs → attempt → copyright
Their whole case, he said, was based on claims involving three separate songs, not just Fish Market.
uncertain
he → say → songs
Therefore, the beat does not exist as a single standalone copyrighted work.
asserted
beat → exist → work
Two things remain unresolved, however.
asserted
things → remain → ?
First, Steely and Clevie still have a shot.
asserted
Steely → have → shot
Slivers of this case involve unauthorized samples of their original record.
asserted
Slivers → involve → record
And second, what if an alleged rhythmic infringement can be proven to be a singular work that has been copied?
asserted
that → allege → ?
Given the importance of beats in hip-hop (some of which are quite intricate), could someone bring forward a similar case?
uncertain
someone → give → case
…and 1 more, not listed.