Toronto Star
· collected 2026-10-02 · by Jennifer Mcdermott The Associated Press
A nonpartisan think tank named Energy Innovation released a report stating that U.S. households will pay an average of $6,500 more for energy through 2040 due to federal policy changes under President Trump's administration. The analysis highlights that in five specific states—Oregon, Mississippi, South Dakota, Virginia, and Wyoming—the increase could be as high as $9,000. The think tank attributes this rise to the rollback of clean energy projects and incentives for fuel-efficient vehicles, leading to increased demand for natural gas and gasoline, thereby driving up prices.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-02,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Households in the contiguous United States will pay thousands of dollars more for energy through 2040 because of federal policy changes since President Donald Trump returned to office, according to modeling released Friday by a nonpartisan think tank.
uncertain
Trump → pay → tank
The Energy Innovation analysis found that households will pay an average of $6,500 more for energy, cumulatively through 2040.
asserted
households → find → 2040
In five states, households will pay roughly $9,000 more: Oregon, Mississippi, South Dakota, Virginia and Wyoming.
asserted
households → pay → more
The California-based think tank said there will be more demand for natural gas for electricity because the administration is canceling new clean energy projects and there will be more demand for gasoline for transportation because Trump and Congress are revoking policies that encouraged or created incentives for more efficient and lower-emissions vehicles.
asserted
that → base → vehicles
Higher demand drives prices up.
asserted
demand → drive → prices
Electricity bills are already rising faster than inflation in much of the U.S., which is being blamed in some areas on demand from data centers.
asserted
which → rise → centers
The Iran war has sent oil and gasoline prices sharply higher, too.
asserted
war → send → prices
Contrarily, Trump has said his administration’s energy policies will make bills more affordable for families and businesses.
asserted
bills → say → families
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said Wednesday that lowering electricity prices remains a top priority and Trump is unleashing reliable energy like coal and natural gas to reverse the “catastrophic damage” Democrats did to the power grid by ramping up clean energy.
asserted
Democrats → say → energy
A 2025 Department of Energy report, mandated by Trump, warned of increasing blackouts if the U.S. continued closing coal and natural gas plants.
asserted
U.S. → mandate → plants
“Joe Biden created a grid crisis; President Trump is fixing it,” Rogers wrote in an email.
asserted
Rogers → create → email
“If the Democrats had their way, these costly and unreliable renewable energy projects would still be failing our grid and our communities.
asserted
projects → have → grid
The Republican president prioritizes fossil fuels to produce electricity, unlike Biden, who saw clean energy as a climate solution.
asserted
who → prioritize → solution
Analysis examined impact on states solely from federal policy changes
It focused on the sweeping package of tax breaks that slashed funding for clean energy tax credits, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill, Trump signed; environmental rollbacks, including clean air and power plant rules and the revocation of a scientific finding that underpinned the U.S. fight against climate change; the loosening of fuel economy standards and blocking of California’s novel rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035; and federal actions to stop wind, solar and hydrogen projects.
asserted
that → examine → projects
These changes will result in annual household energy costs rising in every state in the contiguous U.S., plus job losses in 47 of 48 states and losses to the gross domestic product in 46 states, Energy Innovation said.
asserted
Innovation → result → states
It’s projecting 37,000 additional premature deaths from air pollution, $72 billion in additional healthcare costs and more than 9 billion tons of additional carbon pollution because of the environmental rollbacks.
asserted
It → project → rollbacks
The analysis did not include Alaska or Hawaii because key federal data is not available for those two states, said Robbie Orvis, senior director for modeling and analysis.
asserted
Orvis → include → modeling
Looking at the metrics, Orvis was hard-pressed to find a silver lining.
asserted
Orvis → look → lining
The outlook now is worse for states and the affordability crisis will be worse because of the combined set of policies,” he said.
asserted
he → combine → policies
Climate Justice Alliance legislative director Mar Zepeda said her Washington, D.C., electric bill increased $200 in the past month.
asserted
bill → say → month
Zepeda said electricity demands from data centers are increasing energy rates, and federal “affordability” policies only exacerbate this.
asserted
policies → say → this
“They may call it affordability, but affordable for whom and at what cost?
uncertain
They → call → cost
,” Zepeda said in an email.
asserted
Zepeda → say → email
White House says the think tank is partisan
Rogers said it is “irresponsible” to classify Energy Innovation as nonpartisan because its employees have donated to Democrats and worked with Democrats on climate policy.
asserted
employees → say → policy
Spokesman Silvio Marcacci said they work with policymakers who want to cut emissions and lower bills, regardless of party.
asserted
who → say → party
He said multiple states led by Republicans have used their tool designed to model policies affecting energy use and emissions.
asserted
states → say → use
Much of their data comes from government sources, including the Energy Information Administration.
asserted
Much → come → Administration
Rogers also said states led by Democrats that have embraced aggressive renewable mandates see higher energy costs, notably California and New York.
asserted
that → say → costs
She said this proves Republican policies are working.
asserted
policies → say → ?
The conservative think tank, Institute for Energy Research, said in December that blue states have high rates.
asserted
states → say → rates
However, in the Energy Innovation analysis, three of the five states facing the highest costs have Republican governors, and states that voted for Trump in 2024 will pay an average of $7,000 more in energy spending cumulatively per household, versus $5,800 on average per household in states that voted for Kamala Harris.
asserted
that → face → Harris
Its research has found that states with high levels of wind and solar generation, including Republican-led Iowa and Oklahoma, have experienced the lowest rate increases.
asserted
states → find → increases
The average price residential customers pay for electricity increased over the course of Biden’s term and has continued to rise since Trump returned to office, according to EIA data.
uncertain
Trump → pay → data
Customers paid an average of about 12.6 cents per kilowatt-hour in January 2021 when Biden took office.
asserted
Biden → pay → office
In January 2025, when Trump returned to office, that price stood at nearly 16 cents per kilowatt-hour.
asserted
price → return → hour
Oregon households’ annual energy spending slated to increase the most
The modeling projects federal policy changes will increase annual energy spending in Oregon by $840 per household in 2035 and $1,200 per household in 2040, with a cumulative $9,300 increase from 2026 to 2040 — the highest of any state.
asserted
changes → slat → state
The Oregon Citizens’ Utility Board advocates for residential utility customers.
asserted
Board → advocate → customers
Executive Director Bob Jenks called those numbers “frightening” because Oregon already has an energy affordability problem.
asserted
Oregon → call → problem
He cited steep rate increases as utilities make upgrades and data centers use more power.
asserted
centers → cite → power
As costs rise, Jenks expects utilities to disconnect more households because people won’t be able to afford their bills.
asserted
people → rise → bills
…and 2 more, not listed.
The Aporia
