Opera Star Anna Netrebko Loses Follow-Up Defamation Case Against the N.Y. Metropolitan Opera

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 5). Opera Star Anna Netrebko Loses Follow-Up Defamation Case Against the N.Y. Metropolitan Opera. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/05/opera-star-anna-netrebko-loses-follow-up-defamation-case-against-the-n-y-metropolitan-opera/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-05 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

Judge Analisa Torres has dismissed Anna Netrebko's defamation case against the New York Metropolitan Opera. The opera fired Netrebko, a Russian national and former lead singer, after she refused to publicly denounce Vladimir Putin following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Netrebko had previously been accused of supporting Putin. She claimed that Met general manager Peter Gelb defamed her in subsequent public statements.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-06, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Anna Netrebko, a Russian opera star and former principal singer at the New York Metropolitan Opera, has lost a defamation lawsuit against the Met. In 2022, Netrebko was fired by the Met after its general manager, Peter Gelb, became dissatisfied with her response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. When the war broke out on February 24, 2022, Netrebko had posted a statement on Instagram expressing concern for those affected and calling for a peaceful resolution. However, the next day, the Met asked her to issue a specific denunciation of Vladimir Putin, which she refused to do. Instead, she released her own statement opposing the war while also maintaining that artists should not be forced to make public statements against their will. The court ruled in favor of the Met, upholding its decision to fire Netrebko over her handling of the situation.

Written for “Anna Netrebko Defamation Lawsuit” on 2026-10-21, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Anna Netrebko Defamation Lawsuit
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
67
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
12 of 67 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-06 · source text last changed 2026-09-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 842 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
153 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Readers might want to know: How often do civilians use guns to help stop shooters who pose ongoing threats to multiple people?
🔮 The reality is that our en banc court is often unable or unwilling to fix things at odds with Supreme Court precedent.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From a press release last month, just posted on Westlaw: N.C. Detective Agency, a Durham-based security company, will pay $65,231 in compensatory damages and back pay, and take other corrective actions to voluntarily resolve a religious discrimination investigation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today.
🔮 During a discussion in 2016 concerning whether Sabatini would endorse Knouse's application for an upcoming fellowship at Whitehead, Sabatini expressed concern that Knouse took herself too seriously and asked Knouse whether she ever had "fun," "fuck[ed] around," or had sex.
🔮 Some colorful lawyer wisdom (see, e.g., Dunn v. U.S.(5th Cir. 1962)); I found versions of this in newspapers going back to 1931, though it may have been a familiar phrase even then.
🔮 The dictionary definition of "refuse" cited by Nunes includes this meaning: "to show or express an unwillingness to do or comply with."
🔮 [Under Pennsylvania precedent,] [A] court may prohibit a parent from advocating religious beliefs, which, if acted upon, would constitute a crime.
🔮 Even in First Amendment cases, where the facial-challenge bar is lower than it otherwise might be, the plaintiff [in a facial challenge] must show that "a substantial number of [the law's] applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."
🔮 Officers who violate the law may be criminally prosecuted by the State.
🔮 The standard for the granting of Pseudonym status can be found in Practice Book § 11–20A(h)(1) which provides in pertinent part: "Pseudonyms may be used in place of the name of a party or parties only with the prior approval of the judicial authority and only if the judicial authority concludes that such order is necessary to preserve an interest which is determined to override the public's interest in knowing the name of the party or parties.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-19 · Reason
Open Thread
2026-10-18 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 153 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Instagram Met Russia Russian Ukraine

Subjects

Netrebko PERSON · 19× Met ORG · 8× Putin PERSON · 5× Russia GPE · 4× Russian NORP · 4× Anna Netrebko PERSON · 3× Gelb PERSON · 3× Instagram ORG · 3× Ukraine GPE · 3× Metropolitan GPE · 2×

Narrative

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From Netrebko v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n Inc., decided Thursday by Judge Analisa Torres (S.D.N.Y.): In early 2022, the Met fired {Anna Netrebko, a Russian national and former "reigning prima donna" of the [Met]} after [Met general manager Peter] Gelb was dissatisfied with Netrebko's failure to make a public statement following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine….
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-05
🔮 In a phone call on March 2, Gelb told Netrebko to issue a statement specifically denouncing Putin, or she would be fired.

Claims (67 extracted, 12 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From Netrebko v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n Inc., decided Thursday by Judge Analisa Torres (S.D.N.Y.): In early 2022, the Met fired {Anna Netrebko, a Russian national and former "reigning prima donna" of the [Met]} after [Met general manager Peter] Gelb was dissatisfied with Netrebko's failure to make a public statement following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine…. asserted
Gelb → decide → Ukraine
Prior to 2022, Netrebko was widely reported to be a supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin. asserted
Netrebko → report → Putin
On February 25, 2022, after Russia invaded Ukraine, Netrebko stated on Instagram, "These are very sad days and we are deeply concerned for the well-being of all people involved. asserted
we → invade → people
And so we hope and pray for a swift and peaceful resolution." asserted
we → hope → resolution
The following day, the Met asked Netrebko to publicly "denounc[e] Putin … using specific language" it had approved. asserted
it → ask → language
Instead, Netrebko issued her own social media statement that she was against the war, adding, however, that she was also opposed to "forcing artists, or any public figure, to voice their political opinions in public and to denounce their homeland. asserted
she → issue → homeland
That same day, Netrebko reposted a comment from a third party on her Instagram story characterizing "people from the West" who "pretend to be brave … by putting in trouble artists who asked nothing" as "human shits" and "as evil as blind ag[g]ressors. asserted
who → reposte → ag[g]ressors
On February 27, 2022, one day after Netrebko's post, the Met publicly stated that it "can no longer engage with artists or institutions that support Putin or are supported by him—not until the invasion and killing has been stopped, order has been restored and restitutions have been made." asserted
restitutions → state → him
Two days later, on March 1, Netrebko again posted on Instagram, this time saying, "I am opposed to this senseless war of aggression and I am calling on Russia to end this war right now." asserted
I → post → war
In a phone call on March 2, Gelb told Netrebko to issue a statement specifically denouncing Putin, or she would be fired. asserted
she → tell → Putin
Netrebko responded that, as a Russian citizen, she "could not make such a statement." uncertain
she → respond → statement
On March 3, 2022, the Met announced that Netrebko would not perform in the 2021–22 or 2022–23 seasons. asserted
Netrebko → announce → seasons
About four weeks later, on March 30, Netrebko issued a public statement that she "condemn[s] the war on Ukraine," that her "position is clear," and that she is "not a member of any political party nor [ ] allied with any leader of Russia." asserted
she → issue → Russia
The Met did not rehire Netrebko. asserted
Met → rehire → Netrebko
Netrebko sued for, among other things, defamation, and the court dismissed the defamation claim. uncertain
court → sue → claim
But Netrebko then added claims alleging (among other things) "that after Netrebko filed this lawsuit, the Met 'started a renewed public campaign' in which Gelb defamed Netrebko." uncertain
Gelb → add → Netrebko
Netrebko's supplemental defamation claim is based on five of Gelb's statements quoted in three [Ukrainian and Austrian] news articles from June to July 2025: uncertain
claim → base → July
- "I also immediately gave our leading star, Anna Netrebko, the choice of either disavowing Putin and the war, or being fired by the Metropolitan. asserted
I → give → Metropolitan
She chose, and we fired her. asserted
we → choose → her
Later on, she announced she was against the war. asserted
she → announce → war
But she only did this to show that she should be given [a way] back, if not [to] the Metropolitan, [then to] other opera companies. asserted
she → do → companies
- "Following extensive discussions with Anna Netrebko, our star performer at the time, I dismissed her, as she refused to publicly distance herself from the Russian regime." asserted
she → follow → regime
- "Her later statement—only a month afterwards—in which she claimed to be against the war was, in my opinion, insincere. asserted
she → claim → opinion
It was issued only after her dismissal. asserted
It → issue → dismissal
From a legal perspective, I believe that statement was not genuine. asserted
statement → believe → perspective
I do not believe she meant it." asserted
she → believe → it
- "[I]t is important to emphasize that I gave her the opportunity to publicly distance herself from Putin. asserted
I → emphasize → Putin
She told me she could not. uncertain
she → tell → me
I believe she had certain conversations with the Kremlin. asserted
she → believe → Kremlin
As I understand it, she returned to me and said, 'I stand with my country.'" asserted
I → understand → country
- "In my view, she condemned the war purely out of expediency and only after the Met had fired her. asserted
Met → condemn → her
I believe there are numerous examples of her sympathy toward Putin and his ideology." asserted
I → believe → Putin
"Netrebko claims that the statements are false because, inter alia, she 'did disavow the war' in her February and March 2022 posts. uncertain
she → claim → posts
She further claims that Gelb knew his statements were false when he made them. uncertain
he → claim → them
For example, she alleges that Gelb 'knew it was false to say that Netrebko had not condemned the war before the Met terminated her' because he reviewed her March 1, 2022 public statement and had characterized it as 'anti-war' and 'denouncing the war.' asserted
he → allege → war
The court concluded that Netrebko hadn't adequately "specific factual allegations permitting a reasonable inference" that defendants knew the statements were false (or at least were likely false)—that's the so-called "actual malice" requirement imposed on defamation lawsuits brought by public figures such as Netrebko: asserted
statements → conclude → Netrebko
A complaint must allege "objective facts" from which a Court could infer actual malice—for example, the "the defendant's own actions or statements, the dubious nature of his sources, and the inherent improbability of the story[,] among other circumstantial evidence." uncertain
Court → allege → evidence
In Statement 1, Gelb states that he gave Netrebko the choice of disavowing both Putin and the war or being fired and that she made her choice. asserted
she → state → choice
Netrebko argues that Gelb knew this statement was false because he knew that Netrebko could not choose to disavow Putin once her manager told Gelb she was "scared" to make such a statement. uncertain
she → argue → statement
Nothing in the ASC raises an inference that Gelb believed or strongly considered that Netrebko lacked this choice. asserted
Netrebko → raise → choice
…and 27 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support