Man City found guilty of HUGE financial 'sham' as Premier League confirm verdict in blistering statement: Club cooked their books by £900m - and now could be RELEGATED

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-30 · by Mike Keegan

Quick Summary

The Premier League has declared Manchester City guilty of serious breaches of financial regulations, including artificially inflating revenues by £900 million over nine years through sham contracts with commercial partners. This verdict comes after an extensive investigation that found the club misrepresented its finances to circumvent spending rules. The league is now considering sanctions against City, which could range from fines to severe penalties like relegation or transfer bans. Manchester City has rejected these findings and plans to appeal the decision.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-30, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Manchester City has been found guilty of almost all (114 out of 115) charges related to breaching Premier League financial regulations, according to reports by The Athletic. The charges stem from an investigation that began in February 2023 and cover a period from 2009 to 2018. City has yet to confirm the verdict but maintains its case is still ongoing.

The offenses include providing inaccurate financial information, failing to disclose player and manager payments accurately, breaching UEFA’s financial fair play rules, and non-cooperation with Premier League investigations. The club faces potential punishments ranging from significant points deductions to suspension from competitions.

City plans to appeal the decision, which could extend legal proceedings for several months. Liverpool's Jurgen Klopp has previously welcomed any ruling that would see his team awarded a title if City’s three titles (2012-13, 2014-15, and 2017-18) are stripped due to the breaches. However, no sanctions have been finalized yet. The saga began in November 2018 when German outlet Der Spiegel published emails suggesting City had covered up true sources of income to comply with financial regulations. UEFA and the Premier League launched investigations shortly after these revelations.

Written for “Man City Premier League Charges Verdict” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 85 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
7%
3 of 44 hedged
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
64.9
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
86
Sports
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Man City Premier League Charges Verdict
Sports · 86 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald · 0.92 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 26 📰 publisher trust 61
“Both articles describe Manchester City being found guilty of financial irregularities involving 'sham' contracts over a nine-year period with a total value exceeding £900 million, as determined by an independent panel.”
BBC News · 0.85 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 9 of 66 📰 publisher trust 78
“Both articles describe Manchester City's guilty ruling for financial breaches as determined by an independent commission on the same day.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 53 📰 publisher trust 65
“Both articles report on Manchester City's guilty verdict for breaking Premier League financial regulations, with similar dates and details about the charges and potential penalties.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 32 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe Manchester City's guilty verdict for financial breaches in Premier League rules on the same specific date.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 25 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles report on Manchester City's guilty verdict for financial rule breaches by the Premier League, covering the same time period and outcome.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 27% hedged 3 of 11 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles describe Manchester City's guilty verdict for financial wrongdoing and the impact of the Abu Dhabi takeover on the club.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Centre further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the same specific finding and verdict by an independent commission regarding Manchester City's financial violations in the Premier League.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 65
“Both articles report on the Premier League's verdict finding Manchester City guilty of financial wrongdoing, specifically cooking their books by £900m over a nine-year period.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 3 of 17 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles report on the same specific incident of Manchester City being found guilty by an independent commission for financial misconduct, with similar details about sham deals and inflated revenues.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 18 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles report on Manchester City's guilty verdict from an independent commission for financial misconduct during a nine-year period.”

Publisher

Daily Mail · 3692 article(s) · 12 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 12 correction(s)
2026-10-04
Prison chief stands down over botched execution
2026-10-03
Tennessee prison chief who oversaw botched execution of Christa Pike resigns, governor announces
2026-09-25
Twisted teacher who started school FIGHT CLUB and encouraged children to attack each other is given shockingly lenient punishment
2026-09-22
Melbourne inmate vanished without trace while carrying his brother's coffin 150 days ago - and cops are still hunting him
2026-09-21
Magistrate blasts Melbourne marketing mum Christina Georgiou over 'despicable' $50,000 fraud: How a master's graduate with a drug debt ended up rorting Covid and flood relief schemes
2026-09-18
Female corrections officer fired and arrested over claims she sneaked her home cooked meals into jail to give to inmates
2026-09-18
Woke NYC mayor offers condolences after alleged murderer, 20, dies in custody... but makes NO mention of his disabled victim
2026-09-15
Infamous prisoner known for his 'stop snitching' slogan DISAPPEARS during transfer from one federal prison to another
2026-09-15
Charles Manson's 'right-hand man' dies in prison at 83 after his parole was blocked 8 times
2026-09-15
Jeffrey Epstein's suicide watch 'companion' insists paedophile financier DID kill himself after becoming 'defeated' in his final days
2026-09-07
The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary
2026-09-06
Clarifications and corrections

Who wrote this

Mike Keegan
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The chair of the Independent Football Regulator (IFR) has hinted that Manchester City's owners could be removed from the English game after the club were found guilty of all the substantive charges brought against them by the Premier League for financial wrongdoing.
🔮 City witnesses were also accused of lying in front of the three-person panel, in an explosive verdict that will further send shockwaves through football after news of the club’s guilt first leaked on Friday.
🔮 Manchester City chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak has said the club is confident it will clear its name after being found guilty of financial doping.
🔮 The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation.
Also by Mike Keegan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Abu Dhabi City Man City Manchester City the Premier League

Subjects

City ORG · 8× the Premier League ORG · 6× ADUG ORG · 3× Premier League ORG · 3× Abu Dhabi GPE · 2× Ferran Soriano PERSON · 2× Man City ORG · 2× Manchester City ORG · 2× Andy Burnham PERSON · 1× Premier League's ORG · 1×

Narrative

It added that the panel, whose hearing concluded in December 2024, had found that the club had falsely altered the financial picture at the Etihad to the tune of £900m. The Premier League said that City was actually ‘significantly in breach of both the Premier League’s and UEFA’s spending limits’ during the time period in question - 2009-2018 - when it won eight major trophies. Deals with a number of sponsors were part of ‘a disguised funding scheme, whereby those companies were only required to pay a portion of the relevant sponsorship fees’, the statement added, saying that ‘the remainder was funded by Abu Dhabi United Group Investment & Development Ltd (ADUG), which owned the club’.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 City witnesses were also accused of lying in front of the three-person panel, in an explosive verdict that will further send shockwaves through football after news of the club’s guilt first leaked on Friday.

Claims (44 extracted, 3 hedged)

- READ MORE: Why Premier League's Man City verdict is treacherous for Prime Minister Andy Burnham, the threat it poses to the British economy and how the Abu Dhabi investment in Manchester is not all it seems - asserted
it → read → Manchester
READ MORE: How do we stop the Man City scandal from ever happening again? asserted
we → read → scandal
It's simple, the Premier League MUST ban nation states from owning our clubs Manchester City cooked the books to the tune of £900m in a nine-year period peppered with ‘sham’ deals during which they became the major force in English football, a commission has found. asserted
commission → ban → football
In a damning 40-page verdict City, who won eight trophies during the spell involved, artificially inflated sponsorship agreements and pumped money into the club from its Abu Dhabi owners via disguised payments in a bid to swerve Premier League spending rules. asserted
who → win → rules
The eight-times champions were found guilty of ‘all charges related to serious breaches’ of the regulations and the majority of those in relation to its failure to co-operate with the competition’s probe. asserted
champions → find → probe
City witnesses were also accused of lying in front of the three-person panel, in an explosive verdict that will further send shockwaves through football after news of the club’s guilt first leaked on Friday. asserted
news → accuse → Friday
All punishments, including expulsion, transfer bans and points deductions are open to the Premier League and a sanction hearing will take place in due course. asserted
hearing → include → course
However, City quickly confirmed that it would be launching an appeal ahead of Friday’s deadline and - amid extraordinary scenes - accused the Premier League of creating a ‘conspiracy theory’. asserted
it → confirm → theory
The Premier League has confirmed that Manchester City have been found guilty of 'all charges related to serious breaches' of the league's financial regulations City's chief executive Ferran Soriano (centre) later circulated a video sent to club staff stressing that the allegations were false A fiery club statement branded the verdict ‘opinion’ and tellingly labelled the independent panel a ‘Premier League commission’. asserted
statement → confirm → panel
In a video sent to 1,000 staff and seen by Daily Mail Sport, infuriated chief executive Ferran Soriano said the allegations were ‘just not true’ and repeated the claim that they had provided ‘irrefutable evidence’. uncertain
they → send → evidence
‘Very soon we will look back at this as another time in our history when we dealt with adversity and overcame it together,’ he added. asserted
he → look → it
The bombshell statement was released late on Tuesday afternoon. asserted
statement → release → afternoon
In it, the Premier League said the panel found City arranged ‘sham contracts (which misrepresented the true agreement between the parties) with a number of its commercial partners, as well as relying on ‘sham’ agreements with others, to artificially inflate the club’s revenues and reduce its costs’. asserted
which → say → costs
It added that the panel, whose hearing concluded in December 2024, had found that the club had falsely altered the financial picture at the Etihad to the tune of £900m. The Premier League said that City was actually ‘significantly in breach of both the Premier League’s and UEFA’s spending limits’ during the time period in question - 2009-2018 - when it won eight major trophies. Deals with a number of sponsors were part of ‘a disguised funding scheme, whereby those companies were only required to pay a portion of the relevant sponsorship fees’, the statement added, saying that ‘the remainder was funded by Abu Dhabi United Group Investment & Development Ltd (ADUG), which owned the club’. asserted
which → add → club
The panel also found further ‘sham’ arrangements, funded by ADUG, which allowed City to record lower operating expenses that it incurred, along with a ‘”sham” circular arrangement with Fordham, an entity that purchased the club’s players’ image rights, that was funded by ADUG’. asserted
that → find → ADUG
The result was that the club had ‘filed misstated accounts and concealed the true state of its finances from its auditors and football regulators’. asserted
club → file → auditors
Premier League CEO Richard Masters claimed that the commission's verdict had 'vindicated' the league's decision to pursue the charges Had City reported accurately ‘it would have been in breach of both the League’s and UEFA’s spending limits by a very substantial amount’. asserted
it → claim → amount
The panel also found that City committed multiple breaches of its duties of co-operation and good faith in that it failed to assist the Premier League’s four-year investigation, triggered by the emergence of club emails obtained by a hacker. asserted
it → find → hacker
Indeed, City had ‘made concerted efforts to stop and frustrate the Premier League investigation’. asserted
City → make → investigation
The report noted that issues ‘were fiercely contested between the parties’. asserted
issues → note → parties
It added that proceedings lasted for 42 days and acknowledged that it had ‘taken us much longer than we would have wished’ to reach a conclusion, which ‘was regrettable’. asserted
which → add → conclusion
Transcripts of evidence given ran to more than 7,000 pages. asserted
Transcripts → give → pages
The lop-sided verdict also rounded on ‘a number of important factual witnesses’ who gave evidence on behalf of the club, saying such evidence was ‘false’ and stating that some gave evidence ‘they knew to be untrue and so had been dishonest’. asserted
they → round → evidence
From 2009 to 2018 it found City claimed commercial income of £949.94m when only £119.25m had come from sponsors – which was the figure which should have appeared in the accounts. asserted
which → find → accounts
The statement added that City’s core defence was ‘untrue’, describing it as an explanation ‘concocted well after the event in an attempt to obscure and conceal the realities of the Disguised Funding Scheme’. asserted
defence → add → Scheme
Richard Masters, Premier League chief executive, said the competition had been ‘vindicated’ and that the club had ‘systematically broken Premier League rules for nearly a decade’. asserted
club → say → decade
‘It is a key responsibility of the Premier League to ensure that the Rules, approved by the clubs themselves, are upheld to protect the integrity of the competition,’ he said. asserted
he → ensure → competition
‘It is paramount that the League remains competitive and fair for all clubs and for the fans. asserted
League → remain → fans
We take that role extremely seriously. asserted
We → take → role
There are elements of the case that remain to be decided, including, importantly, what sanction must follow for these breaches. asserted
sanction → be → breaches
Now we have the Commission’s decision, we are committed to moving swiftly through the remainder of the process, to provide certainty for the League, our clubs and fans. asserted
we → have → League
Premier League rules state that after City lodges its appeal the chair of the panel should appoint a three-person appeal board ‘as soon as reasonably practicable’. asserted
chair → state → board
Any objections to the subsequent appointments should then be lodged within two working days. asserted
objections → lodge → days
The whole process should be concluded within 12 weeks. asserted
process → conclude → weeks
Whether that will be the case remains to be seen. asserted
be → remain → ?
It is unclear whether a sanction will be handed down before an appeal takes place. uncertain
appeal → hand → place
In a statement released shortly after the Premier League, City said it was ‘both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League Commission’. asserted
it → release → Commission
It added: ‘The club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case. asserted
body → add → case
‘The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements uncompleted. asserted
elements → remain → ?
Manchester City will now pursue the appeal avenues open to it, on the basis that the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe.’ asserted
opinion → pursue → law
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support