California tried to protect students’ data. Tech companies found loopholes

The Markup · collected 2026-09-04 · by Adam Echelman
Read the original at The Markup ↗

Summary

California Assemblymember Dawn Addis is sponsoring a bill, Assembly Bill 1159, that aims to protect students' data from being sold or used by tech companies. Despite existing laws aimed at protecting children's data privacy, loopholes have allowed many tech companies to continue collecting and selling personal information. According to the California Labor Federation, which supports the bill, nearly $8 million was spent on campaign donations in 2024 by groups opposing the measure, including the California Chamber of Commerce and TechNet, a trade association representing major tech companies. Experts say that even if the bill passes, it may not be enough to prevent companies from finding new ways to collect students' data.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-05, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
75
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
17%
13 of 75 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
94.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-05 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

California's attempts to protect students' data have been found to have loopholes by tech companies. Piedmont Unified School District, Tamalpais Union High School District, and Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District all purchased versions of the team management software TeamSnap, but only Santa Monica Malibu district responded to questions about any privacy restrictions imposed on the company. This comes as Assemblymember Dawn Addis is carrying a state bill that would add new protections for students' data. California has laws aimed at protecting children's data privacy, but these laws have exceptions that allow tech companies to continue packaging and selling students' personal information. This issue is particularly relevant given the Trump administration's efforts to collect data about California residents' immigration status, gender identity, and public benefits use.

Written for “California Student Data Protection Fails” on 2026-09-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 4348 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-05

Story

📰 California Student Data Protection Fails
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
World & Nation
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 7 of 80 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a package of bills proposed by California lawmakers to regulate Big Tech, while Article B discusses existing laws in California and how tech companies have found loopholes around them”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 33% hedged 9 of 27 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes an audit finding tech companies ignoring California privacy law, while Article B discusses the digitization of students' lives and mentions California's data protection laws without referencing a specific event”
The Markup
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 2 of 15 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A discusses a bill in the California legislature related to online dating app safety, while Article B discusses California's efforts to protect students' data from tech companies.”
The Markup
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 10 of 73 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A discusses the issue with AI-powered chatbots in California colleges, while Article B focuses on technology companies finding loopholes in California's data protection laws for students.”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 14% hedged 12 of 87 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes a man discovering an abandoned trailer with surveillance cameras, while Article B discusses California's laws on protecting students' data from tech companies.”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 34 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes an investigation by Congress into data broker breaches, while Article B is about California's attempt to protect student data and tech companies finding loopholes”

Publisher

The Markup · 20 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.118 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Adam Echelman
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This year, Assemblymember Dawn Addis, a San Luis Obispo Democrat, is carrying a high-profile state bill that would add new protections for students.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

CalMatters California Klaxon Markup San Luis Obispo

Subjects

California GPE · 7× CalMatters ORG · 2× Google ORG · 2× King PERSON · 2× Dawn Addis PERSON · 1× Democrat NORP · 1× Klaxon ORG · 1× Markup ORG · 1× San Luis Obispo GPE · 1× Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Public records show that Piedmont Unified School District in Alameda County, Tamalpais Union High School District in Marin County, and Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District all purchased versions of TeamSnap, but only the Santa Monica Malibu district responded to questions about any privacy restriction imposed on the company.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-05
🔮 This year, Assemblymember Dawn Addis, a San Luis Obispo Democrat, is carrying a high-profile state bill that would add new protections for students.

Claims (75 extracted, 13 hedged)

The Markup, now a part of CalMatters, uses investigative reporting, data analysis, and software engineering to challenge technology to serve the public good. asserted
Markup → use → good
Sign up for Klaxon, a newsletter that delivers our stories and tools directly to your inbox. asserted
that → sign → inbox
Inside the classroom, online tools proctor exams, create flashcards and submit assignments. asserted
tools → proctor → assignments
Outside, technology coordinates school sports, helps bus drivers find the right route and maintains students’ health records. asserted
drivers → coordinate → records
California has a number of laws aimed at protecting children’s data privacy, but those laws have exceptions that allow many tech companies to continue packaging and selling students’ personal information. asserted
companies → have → information
This year, Assemblymember Dawn Addis, a San Luis Obispo Democrat, is carrying a high-profile state bill that would add new protections for students. asserted
that → carry → students
She says it’s important, especially as the Trump admin is trying to collect data about California residents’ immigration status, gender identity, and their use of certain public benefits. asserted
admin → say → benefits
In 2014, California passed a landmark student privacy law that prohibited technology companies from selling students’ data, targeting students in advertising, or disclosing their personal information. asserted
that → pass → information
Then in 2018, the state passed another unprecedented bill that required all companies give California users certain privacy rights, such as a chance to opt out of data collection and delete some of their information. asserted
companies → pass → information
But as technology evolved and proliferated, privacy laws repeatedly fell short in protecting California’s students — at the same time that the federal government has tried to collect increasing amounts of personal information, Addis said. asserted
Addis → evolve → information
Her bill would restrict how AI companies use student data and create new data protections for college students. asserted
companies → restrict → students
Some of Sacramento’s most powerful players are paying close attention to the measure, including the California Labor Federation, which supports the bill, and the California Chamber of Commerce, which opposes it. asserted
which → pay → it
Combined, these two groups spent nearly $8 million on campaign donations to state legislators or other political activities in 2024, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database. uncertain
groups → combine → database
TechNet, a trade association that represents many of the most powerful tech companies, also opposes the bill. asserted
that → represent → bill
The proposal, Assembly Bill 1159, would close certain loopholes in the state’s 2014 education privacy law, but experts say it may not be enough to prevent companies from selling students’ data. uncertain
it → close → data
Jen King is a privacy and data policy fellow at Stanford’s institute for AI, where she studies the tricks that companies use to gather users’ data and prevent them from opting out, sometimes known as “dark patterns.” asserted
companies → study → patterns
In her personal life, she’s vigilant about avoiding online data tracking and maintains a landline in her Bay Area home to avoid giving out her cell phone number. asserted
she → ’ → number
Behind the scenes, it orchestrated opposition Google organized business owners against California legislation to force its Chrome web browser to safeguard personal data. King doesn’t want her children’s information available online or for any company to sell, though sometimes it happens before she can stop it. asserted
she → orchestrate → it
In the fall, King got an email about a platform called TeamSnap, which her 12-year-old son’s cross country coaches were using to manage the team’s roster. asserted
coaches → get → roster
The company wanted her information, including her name, date of birth, gender, email address, and phone number. asserted
company → want → birth
Once she logged in to the platform, she could see some of her son’s information, such as his name, email, and date of birth, were already listed. uncertain
some → log → birth
Photos and personal information from all of her son’s teammates were also available for her to see. asserted
her → see → teammates
“I was super irritated,” she said. asserted
she → say → ?
“You don’t need my birth date — I’m a freaking parent.” asserted
I → need → date
She acknowledged some personal information could be useful for a coach but said that other questions seem designed to help the platform sell information to data brokers and ultimately, to advertisers. uncertain
platform → acknowledge → advertisers
Her 17-year-old son’s data is also on TeamSnap, she later learned, because his robotics team uses it. asserted
team → learn → it
This month, when King tried to show The Markup and CalMatters her TeamSnap account, a pop-up appeared, asking her if the company could track her activity across other apps and websites. uncertain
company → try → apps
Federal law requires companies to get parental consent before knowingly collecting or selling data from children 12 and under, but once a child turns 13, their data is generally treated much like an adult’s information, especially when that child is interacting with tech platforms outside of school. asserted
child → require → school
TeamSnap’s privacy policy says it doesn’t knowingly collect personal information about users under 13 “without express parental consent,” though it says in some cases a team or organization may provide information on behalf of the child. uncertain
team → say → child
The policy also says that TeamSnap has “not sold the personal information of any consumer for monetary consideration” in the last 12 months, but that its “use of cookies and other tracking technologies may be considered a sale of personal information under the CCPA (California privacy law).” uncertain
use → say → CCPA
Information sold to advertisers and marketers included users’ names, contact information, purchase history and geolocation, the policy says. asserted
policy → sell → names
California privacy law specifically requires certain large for-profit companies to get consent to collect data from anyone under 16. asserted
law → require → 16
Often, consent happens when a user first opens a website and a pop-up appears, asking if the website can sell your data or track your cookies. asserted
website → happen → cookies
If a teacher, coach, or other authority figure tells a student that they have to use a website or an app, then the student cannot realistically opt out, King said. asserted
King → tell → website
They may be too young to understand how to opt out, she added. uncertain
she → understand → ?
“Most 15-, 16-year-olds don’t have any idea what this is about.” asserted
this → have → what
Even older college students may have little agency in the technology they use, especially if it’s required for class or residential life. uncertain
it → have → class
At Stanford, for example, King said her undergraduate students are often required to create Facebook accounts for student groups. asserted
students → say → groups
King said she reluctantly gave TeamSnap her personal information, including her name, email, date of birth, and the landline number for her home, because it was the only way to get updates about her son’s team. asserted
it → say → team
In 2014, California became the first state in the country to regulate education technology companies directly, but being first asserted
California → become → companies
…and 35 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support