Home - CBSNews.com
· collected 2026-09-04 · by Sarah N. Lynch, Joe Walsh
A US federal judge has allowed the Pentagon to move forward with firing three journalists from the Stars and Stripes military newspaper. The decision, made by Judge Trevor McFadden, means that publisher Max Lederer, editor-in-chief Erik Slavin, and reporter Lara Korte can be terminated while their lawsuit challenging the firings continues through the court system. According to McFadden's 24-page ruling, the journalists' speech was likely in their official capacity as Stars and Stripes employees, not as private citizens, when they gave interviews to CBS News. The judge found that the Pentagon did not clearly violate the First Amendment rights of the three journalists by firing them last month.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-04,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
A federal judge on Friday allowed the Pentagon to move forward with terminating three employees of the Stars and Stripes military newspaper.
asserted
Pentagon → allow → newspaper
In a 24-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden turned down a request by the newspaper's publisher, editor-in-chief and Middle East reporter to halt their firings while a lawsuit challenging the terminations works its way through the court system.
asserted
lawsuit → turn → system
McFadden found the government likely did not violate their First Amendment rights by firing them last month.
asserted
government → find → them
The plaintiffs — publisher Max Lederer, editor-in-chief Erik Slavin and reporter Lara Korte — were given separation notices in August and placed on administrative leave over allegations of insubordination.
asserted
plaintiffs → give → insubordination
The move raised questions about the future of the Stars and Stripes, which is operated by the military and is partially funded by taxpayers, but has traditionally operated independently of military leadership or the White House.
asserted
which → raise → leadership
For Slavin and Korte, the alleged insubordination cited in their termination notices was related to interviews they gave to CBS News for a piece on "CBS Sunday Morning" that aired in July.
asserted
that → allege → July
In the story, Korte said that she worked for Stars and Stripes, "not for the Pentagon, not for any administration, not for any policymaker.
asserted
she → say → policymaker
The firings took place shortly after the newspaper published a piece detailing
and food and water shortages aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, which had been deployed for nine months.
asserted
which → take → months
A day after that story ran, the lawsuit said, Pentagon officials ordered Lederer, the Stripes' publisher, to issue notices of separation to Slavin and Korte.
asserted
Lederer → run → Slavin
Lederer declined to present them and opted to resign, but he was fired before he could do so.
uncertain
he → decline → them
Parts of McFadden's ruling analyzed whether Korte and Slavin spoke with CBS News in their capacity as Stars and Stripes employees.
asserted
Korte → analyze → employees
Prior Supreme Court cases have found that government employees' right not to be fired for their speech hinges partially on whether they were speaking as private citizens or as part of their official job duties.
asserted
they → find → duties
McFadden found Korte and Slavin's speech was likely the latter.
asserted
speech → find → ?
"[At] bottom, on the current record, Plaintiffs' real complaint seems to be that they were victims of a cruel bait-and-switch.
asserted
they → seem → bait
They are being fired for giving pre-approved interviews on their paper's behalf in which they largely toed the company line," the judge wrote.
asserted
judge → fire → line
"Whatever else such a scheme may violate, it does not clearly offend the First Amendment."
uncertain
it → violate → Amendment
The ruling came shortly after lawyers for the three fired Stars and Stripes employees squared off against Justice Department attorneys in federal court earlier Friday, arguing that the Pentagon had unlawfully terminated the journalists in violation of their protected free speech.
asserted
Pentagon → come → speech
In federal court, attorney Taryn Wilgus Null told McFadden in the District of Columbia that her journalist clients were appearing as sources — and not as reporters — for the CBS piece and were speaking "on matters of public concern" outside of their official duties at Stars and Stripes.
asserted
clients → tell → Stars
"Government employees do not lose their First Amendment free speech rights," she told the court, noting as well they "were not acting within their ordinary job duties" and had a choice about whether to be interviewed for CBS News.
asserted
they → lose → News
Brett Covington, a Justice Department lawyer who argued for the Pentagon on Friday, told McFadden that all three journalists routinely did interviews as part of their normal duties, and noted that the CBS News interview had taken place at the Stars and Stripes headquarters with other employees visible in the background.
asserted
employees → argue → background
He also cited an email from Korte in which she wrote she would "rather eat glass" than allow the federal government to tell her what she could or couldn't write.
uncertain
she → cite → what
He said that email offered context which shows she was concerned about "being able to perform her job duties."
asserted
she → say → duties
He also told the court that the publication of the story about the USS Abraham Lincoln was unrelated to the firings, and that the process for those started more than a month before the story ran.
asserted
story → tell → those
"Our position is, it's a red herring," he said.
asserted
he → say → ?
McFadden, prior to ruling, acknowledged that both sides appeared to have some case law on their side to support their arguments, and said the case struck him as requiring a very "fact-driven analysis" that could be different for each of the three journalists.
uncertain
that → rule → journalists
