Some lawmakers doubt a Congress that’s ‘barely capable of email’ can regulate AI

Read the original at NBC News ↗
NBC News · collected 2026-09-26 · by Scott Wong

Quick Summary

Some lawmakers doubt Congress's ability to regulate artificial intelligence due to a perceived lack of technological understanding among its members. Senators Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego mocked the technical ineptitude of their colleagues, while Representative Ro Khanna emphasized that effective regulation requires basic AI knowledge rather than specialized expertise. Despite these criticisms, Representative Don Beyer remains optimistic about Congress's capacity for regulating AI, arguing that political will, not technological understanding, is the primary obstacle to progress.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

WASHINGTON — Amid warnings about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence, some lawmakers doubt Congress's ability to regulate AI effectively. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., noted many members struggle with basic technology terms, saying they "can’t even spell it." Similarly, Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., said many still “don’t know how to get on the internet,” suggesting a lack of familiarity with AI technology. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., emphasized that Congress lacks individuals who understand or use AI, arguing it's like making driving rules without ever having driven. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, added that the Senate recently failed to pass a landmark cryptocurrency bill despite years of work, highlighting how quickly AI developments are outpacing legislative processes.

Written for “AI Regulation Doubts” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
59
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
5%
3 of 59 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
95.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

Story

📰 AI Regulation Doubts
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Dispatch
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 97
“Both articles discuss concerns about Congress's ability to regulate AI but describe different aspects of the broader issue, not a single identical incident.”
Euronews
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses leaders pushing for stronger AI safeguards at the UN General Assembly, while Article B focuses on doubts among lawmakers about Congress's capability to regulate AI.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 3 of 20 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation; one focuses on lawmakers' doubts about Congress's capability to regulate AI, while the other quotes Bill Gates discussing the necessity of regulating AI.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and use by government bodies, not the same specific incident.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses lawmakers' doubts about Congress's ability to regulate AI, while Article B reports on a White House meeting where tech leaders agreed on an AI 'constitution', involving a different specific event and time.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 43 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and safety concerns but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”

Publisher

NBC News · 955 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Scott Wong
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Amid warnings that artificial intelligence could soon wipe out humanity, some lawmakers are not confident that Congress has the expertise or ability to regulate AI.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Ariz. Congress House N.C. WASHINGTON

Subjects

Congress ORG · 9× House ORG · 5× Beyer PERSON · 3× Ariz. GPE · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× WASHINGTON GPE · 2× N.C. GPE · 1× Ruben Gallego PERSON · 1× Thom Tillis PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, was more pessimistic, pointing out that the Senate this month failed to pass a landmark cryptocurrency bill despite years of bipartisan work, and that AI developments seem to be moving at warp speed. “This process of legislating takes so long that by the time we even got to that step — I mean, crypto, we’re four years in.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 Amid warnings that artificial intelligence could soon wipe out humanity, some lawmakers are not confident that Congress has the expertise or ability to regulate AI.

Claims (59 extracted, 3 hedged)

Amid warnings that artificial intelligence could soon wipe out humanity, some lawmakers are not confident that Congress has the expertise or ability to regulate AI. uncertain
Congress → wipe → AI
“A lot of them can’t spell it,” quipped Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. asserted
Tillis → spell → it
“They just don’t have the experience.” asserted
They → have → experience
“They still don’t know how to get on the internet,” let alone understand AI, he said. asserted
he → know → AI
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who represents parts of Silicon Valley, argued that many members of Congress are just not up to speed on AI, and some seem uninterested. asserted
some → represent → AI
“The problem in Congress is not that we don’t have enough computer scientists. asserted
we → have → scientists
It’s that we don’t have enough people who have a basic understanding of how the technology works or are using it,” Khanna said in an interview with NBC News. asserted
Khanna → ’ → News
“It’s like talking about making the rules for driving the road. asserted
It → ’ → road
You don’t have to be an auto mechanic, but it would be nice if you at least were a passenger in a car or had driven a car,” he continued. asserted
he → have → car
“And we’ve had a lot of members of Congress who’ve not been passengers in a car when it comes to AI, or certainly haven’t driven it.” asserted
it → have → it
One thing that everyone seems to agree on: Congress is not close to regulating AI. asserted
Congress → seem → AI
Capitol Hill has been notoriously slow to regulate new technology. asserted
Hill → regulate → technology
It hasn’t passed any sweeping, comprehensive legislation regulating the internet, invented more than 40 years ago, instead taking a more piecemeal approach and relying on existing laws. asserted
It → pass → laws
And exactly 20 years after Facebook became available to the public, lawmakers are still struggling to figure out how to regulate social media. asserted
lawmakers → become → media
New rules aimed at protecting kids online are popular in theory, but actual legislation remains stalled, with House and Senate negotiators deadlocked on the issue. asserted
negotiators → aim → issue
“This is the United States Congress you’re talking about. asserted
you → talk → ?
I mean, nothing moves very quickly,” said Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a former astronaut and Navy combat pilot who backs AI regulation. asserted
who → mean → regulation
It’s “much easier” to fly a fighter jet than to pass AI legislation, he added. asserted
he → ’ → legislation
But while there are plenty of skeptics who believe Congress doesn’t have the capability to tackle AI regulations, there are optimists who think it does. asserted
it → be → regulations
One is Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., who is pursuing a master’s degree in machine learning at George Mason University to keep pace with new technology. asserted
who → pursue → technology
Beyer served on the bipartisan House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence and now serves on a Democratic commission on AI. asserted
Beyer → serve → AI
“Oh, I very much think there’s a capacity here. asserted
I → think → ?
Yeah, you don’t need to be a Ph.D. or a master’s in computer science to know what to do next,” said Beyer, who is 76. asserted
who → need → what
“I think the parallel is we don’t have to be biologists or chemists to set up the FDA, or lawyers or stockbrokers to set up the SEC. asserted
we → think → SEC
There are 12 to 20 members of Congress already, just in the House, that have AI bills. asserted
that → be → bills
” What’s blocking any significant legislative movement on AI is political will from Republicans, he argued. asserted
he → block → Republicans
“I think we definitely have the capacity. asserted
we → think → capacity
What we need is a speaker who will let us put the bills on the floor,” said Beyer, who has been advocating for Democratic leaders to create a select committee on artificial intelligence if the party wins control of the House this fall. asserted
party → need → House
Democrats, a handful of Republicans and key tech leaders believe that Congress needs to step in now and regulate the AI industry following high-profile AI breaches. asserted
Congress → believe → breaches
“AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that … cause a billion deaths,” Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said in an interview with Kristen Welker that will air Sunday on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.” asserted
that → drive → Press
“No one thinks self-regulation is enough,” he added. asserted
he → think → ?
President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will host an AI summit with tech leaders in Washington on Tuesday, according to a White House official and a source familiar with the plans. uncertain
Trump → host → plans
But, given their past comments, it’s likely to focus more on tech innovation and competition than on reining in the companies. asserted
it → give → companies
Trump has repeatedly said that he does not want to “stifle growth of something that will be bigger than the industrial revolution,” as he put it in a speech to world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly this week. asserted
he → say → Assembly
“We’re going to encourage it, not rein it in,” Trump said. asserted
Trump → go → it
He has also dismissed the recent apocalyptic warnings as a “hoax” and said regulations will impede America in its race with China for AI dominance. asserted
regulations → dismiss → dominance
Johnson has said some safety guardrails are needed but has argued Congress should not get in the way of American innovation. asserted
Congress → say → innovation
At a recent campaign rally, Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., who is running in one of the most competitive Senate races in November and is mentioned as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, blamed Trump and the “weakness of our politics” for congressional inaction on AI. asserted
who → run → AI
“Tech titans dig bunkers while warning us the new intelligence they’re creating risks human extinction. asserted
they → dig → extinction
Congress debates youth sports, and the president builds a ballroom,” Ossoff said. asserted
Ossoff → debate → ballroom
…and 19 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support