The U.S. is investigating a strike on a wedding in southern Iran, Vice President J.D. Vance said Thursday, as reports suggest American weapons killed at least five people and injured dozens of others.
“We’re investigating it because obviously we care,” Vance told reporters.
asserted
Vance → investigate → reporters
“We want to know.”
asserted
We → want → ?
The strike represents the U.S.’s latest controversial action in its war with Iran, raising questions about its conduct and civilian harm.
asserted
strike → represent → conduct
Washington and Tehran have escalated their attacks this week, ending a lull in hostilities since July.
asserted
Washington → escalate → July
But Vance said he was “extremely skeptical” about reports coming from Iranian state media, arguing they have “not been a very good scribe about what’s happened in the conflict thus far.”
asserted
what → say → conflict
Iranian state media reported that a residential building in Kuhestak was attacked on Tuesday evening, where a wedding was being celebrated.
asserted
wedding → report → evening
Reuters and the New York Times independently verified footage from the scene and found that a wedding was taking place when the building was struck.
asserted
building → verify → place
Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that it “will respond to these savage crimes with firmness”—and responded to a broader barrage of American attacks by launching missiles and drones at sites used by the U.S. in Middle East states.
asserted
it → say → states
The Iranian Red Crescent Society, a humanitarian group, also urged a probe from the International Criminal Court to assess potential violations of international law.
asserted
Society → urge → law
The U.S. Central Command said Wednesday it was already looking into reports of the incident but argued that the “U.S. military never targets civilians, unlike the [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps],” referring to Iran’s armed forces branch.
asserted
military → say → branch
Vance also defended U.S. military action, telling reporters: “If we do make mistakes, again, this is a big difference between us and Iran: when our military makes mistakes, they learn from them to try to get better from them.”
asserted
they → defend → them
What we know about the strike
asserted
we → know → strike
On the evening of Sept. 1, CENTCOM reported strikes on military targets, including “air defense sites, radar systems, maritime assets and facilities, mine laying capabilities, and communications sites.”
asserted
CENTCOM → report → sites
Iranian media later reported four deaths and at least 68 injured in Kuhestak, a coastal town on the Strait of Hormuz, where trade has been bottlenecked since the start of the U.S.-Iran war in late February.
asserted
trade → report → February
The strikes happened at around 9:30 p.m. local time, per the Red Crescent.
asserted
strikes → happen → Crescent
Analyses of footage from the incident conducted by Reuters and the New York Times reveal that wedding guests were gathered in a Kuhestak building.
asserted
guests → conduct → building
Amid the celebration, what was likely a U.S. munition hit the building and, as the Times put it, “brought down the roof.”
asserted
Times → hit → roof
Experts told Reuters and the Times that weapon fragments seen in Iranian media were consistent with what Americans have used.
asserted
Americans → tell → what
The attacks on Kuhestak also hit a communications tower roughly 100 m away from the building.
asserted
attacks → hit → building
A human rights group told the Associated Press that one of the four people initially reported killed—a 16-year-old—was struck by shrapnel near the tower rather than at the wedding.
asserted
one → tell → wedding
Iranian state television said Thursday that a 22-year-old woman had since died in hospital following the strike, bringing the reported death toll to five.
asserted
woman → say → five
Civilian casualties raise concern
asserted
casualties → raise → concern
The Red Crescent sent a letter to the International Criminal Court Wednesday calling for “an independent, impartial, thorough, and effective investigation,” citing the “civilian character” of the strike’s location.
asserted
Crescent → send → location
The organization also argued that under the Rome Statute, intentionally directing attacks on civilians and knowingly launching a clearly excessive attack may constitute “war crimes.”
uncertain
directing → argue → crimes
However, both Iran and the U.S. are nonparties to the Rome Statute, so the ICC does not have automatic jurisdiction over them.
asserted
ICC → have → them
Still, “the laws of war state that civilians are protected from military attacks,” Melanie O’Brien, a professor of international law at the University of Western Australia, tells TIME.
asserted
O’Brien → state → TIME
It is clear that there was a direct missile hit to the home.
asserted
It → be → home
This would render the attack unlawful.”
It’s also not the U.S.’s first involvement in strikes that hit civilian structures without obvious military use and that endangered or killed civilians.
asserted
that → render → civilians
On the first day of the war with Iran on Feb. 28, a U.S. Tomahawk missile hit a primary school in Minab—just 30 km (18 mi) away from Kuhestak—where more than 100 children were killed.
asserted
children → hit → Kuhestak
O’Brien, however, says she is skeptical about any result from the U.S.-led investigation of the wedding strike: “The U.S. track record is to only investigate when allegations gain significant public traction, and even when any convictions occur, the penalties are minor or pardons are given.”
asserted
pardons → say → traction
The Aporia
