Never smoked a cigarette? You could still be at higher risk for lung cancer

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Fox News · collected 2026-09-25 · by Melissa Rudy

Quick Summary

A new study published in Science reveals that a rare genetic mutation in the EGFR T790M gene significantly increases the risk of developing lung cancer, even in individuals who have never smoked. Carriers of this mutation are 62 times more likely to develop lung cancer compared to non-carriers among never-smokers. The research, conducted by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and 23andMe Research Institute with data from over 3.3 million people, also found that the mutation is most prevalent in Southern Appalachia, where it traces back to British and Irish settlers about 200 years ago. Researchers suggest genetic testing for those with a relevant family history or ancestry, indicating potential future personalized screening guidelines based on inherited risk factors.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-27, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

A recent study published in *Science* found that a rare mutation in the gene EGFR T790M significantly increases lung cancer risk. For individuals who have never smoked, carrying this mutation raises their odds of developing lung cancer by about 62 times compared to those without it. The research, led by experts at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and 23andMe Research Institute, analyzed data from over 3.3 million people. Notably, the gene variant does not elevate risk for other types of cancer. This discovery suggests that lung cancer screening criteria might need to expand beyond just smoking history to include genetic testing for high-risk mutations like EGFR T790M.

Written for “Lung Cancer Risks Beyond Smoking” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
38%
9 of 24 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
68.6
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Lung Cancer Risks Beyond Smoking
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 38% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 23% hedged 6 of 26 📰 publisher trust 64
“While both articles discuss a genetic mutation increasing lung cancer risk in non-smokers, they cite different mutations (the first does not specify which gene, while the second mentions EGFR T790M) and provide slightly different statistics.”

Publisher

Fox News · 2892 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Tennessee's state corrections chief resigns following failed execution of Christa Pike
2026-09-30
Repeat offender with lengthy rap sheet accused of gunning down Kentucky trooper during traffic stop
2026-09-23
Missouri mom who put newborn in oven instead of crib learns fate as murder charge dropped
2026-08-04
Pennsylvania school bus aide accused of sexually assaulting special needs teen

Who wrote this

Melissa Rudy
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Additionally, the marital outcomes were self-reported, and other unmeasured differences between religious and non-religious respondents could have influenced the results.
🔮 The increase in bulimia and other eating disorders among men may also be driven by a desire to emulate celebrities.
🔮 Amid the ongoing investigation into the deaths of two Ole Miss students, representatives of the kratom industry are speaking out about how the product may have been mischaracterized.
🔮 "Despite progress in vaccination and screening, infection-related cancers remain a major global challenge, with the burden falling disproportionately on populations in low- and middle-income countries." The researchers say many of these cancers could have been prevented through vaccination, treatment or screenings.
🔮 Dr. Chris Tuell, clinical director of addiction services at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, said many factors may contribute to the increased rate of drinking among older adults.
🔮 While people’s protein needs will vary based on age, activity level and fitness goals, Zemer said people who regularly strength-train generally benefit from higher intake.
🔮 A rare genetic mutation could put people at a dramatically higher risk of developing lung cancer – even if they’ve never smoked.
🔮 Hundreds of consumers are suing the manufacturers of GLP-1 receptor agonists, alleging the medications may increase the risk of a rare form of vision loss.
🔮 Possible explanations could include an acute medical or cardiac event, an undiagnosed condition or a medication-related complication, he said.
🔮 "I didn't realize that someone who was 19 and also not super-overweight could get on it.
Also by Melissa Rudy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by Melissa Rudy →

Topics

British Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Irish Science U.S.

Subjects

U.S. GPE · 3× British NORP · 2× Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ORG · 2× Irish NORP · 2× 23andMe Research Institute ORG · 1× Alexander Gusev PERSON · 1× Jaclyn LoPiccolo PERSON · 1× LoPiccolo PERSON · 1× Science ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

The researchers suggest that people with a strong family history of lung cancer, multiple lung nodules or tumors, or family roots in parts of the southeastern U.S. should consider speaking with a genetic counselor about whether genetic testing or lung cancer screening makes sense for them.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 A rare genetic mutation could put people at a dramatically higher risk of developing lung cancer – even if they’ve never smoked.

Claims (24 extracted, 9 hedged)

A rare genetic mutation could put people at a dramatically higher risk of developing lung cancer – even if they’ve never smoked. uncertain
they → put → cancer
A rare mutation in the gene EGFR T790M was found to increase lung cancer risk by 25 times compared with people who did not have the mutation, according to a new study published in the journal Science. uncertain
who → find → journal
Among people who had never smoked, carriers of the mutation had about 62 times the odds of lung cancer compared with never-smokers who did not have it. asserted
who → smoke → it
The study, led by investigators at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and 23andMe Research Institute, analyzed data from more than 3.3 million people. asserted
study → lead → people
The gene variant showed no increased risk across 17 other cancers studied. asserted
variant → show → cancers
"Today, lung cancer screening is driven almost entirely by smoking history," study co-author Jaclyn LoPiccolo, M.D., Ph.D., attending physician and lung cancer researcher at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, said in a press release. asserted
LoPiccolo → drive → release
"Our findings raise the possibility that, in the future, screening could also be dictated by inherited genetic risk. uncertain
screening → raise → risk
If further studies confirm the benefit, people with EGFR T790M could be identified through genetic testing and offered personalized CT screening to identify lung cancers when they are at their most curable stage. uncertain
they → confirm → stage
" Most U.S. carriers of the mutation were traced to a shared ancestry linked to British and Irish settlers in Southern Appalachia about 200–225 years ago, the researchers found. asserted
researchers → trace → Appalachia
The mutation remains rare nationwide, affecting roughly one in 15,000–16,000 people. asserted
mutation → remain → people
It is more common in some parts of Southern Appalachia, where researchers estimated that as many as one in 2,000 people may carry it. uncertain
people → estimate → it
"We found that the vast majority of carriers inherited the mutation from the same ancestral lineage," said LoPiccolo. asserted
LoPiccolo → find → lineage
"We could trace that lineage to British and Irish settlers in the United States and show that the mutation became enriched after a founder event and genetic bottleneck in Southern Appalachia about 200 years ago." "It's a fascinating example of how human migration and genealogy can shape disease risk, generations later." uncertain
migration → trace → risk
One of the "remarkable" findings of the study was the fact that a single mutation could have such a strong effect, according to Alexander Gusev, Ph.D., a quantitative geneticist at Dana-Farber. uncertain
mutation → accord → Farber
"To my knowledge it's one of the strongest, if not the strongest, cancer risk increasing mutations that has ever been found," he said in the release. asserted
he → increase → release
When you do both, your risk is the sum of those two risks," he added. asserted
he → do → risks
"So, you definitely don't want to smoke." asserted
you → want → ?
The researchers suggest that people with a strong family history of lung cancer, multiple lung nodules or tumors, or family roots in parts of the southeastern U.S. should consider speaking with a genetic counselor about whether genetic testing or lung cancer screening makes sense for them. asserted
testing → suggest → them
"It's a fascinating example of how human migration and genealogy can shape disease risk, generations later." asserted
migration → shape → risk
Because the mutation is so rare, researchers identified relatively few carriers even among the millions of participants, meaning the exact size of the increased risk remains uncertain. asserted
size → identify → risk
The analysis also relied heavily on 23andMe research participants, who may not represent the broader population. uncertain
who → rely → population
As the mutation is much more common in certain parts of the U.S., the risk estimates may not apply equally to everyone, the researchers noted. uncertain
researchers → apply → everyone
While the study establishes a strong association with lung cancer risk, it does not demonstrate that genetic testing improves mortality or other health outcomes. asserted
testing → establish → mortality
The study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health and the American Cancer Society. asserted
study → fund → Health
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support